For those who think the election doubters have no grounds-

1. Who was calling for impeachment?
2. The Constitution is Spartan, but writers at the time explained their thoughts. Where did they explain thoughts that are consistent with yours?

 

That's been debunked hundreds of times over.

 

No one. At the time the Constitution was written we didn't even have a president. The first impeachment was around 1865 almost 100 years after the Constitution was written. However, Pelosi set the bar way low and probably opened the floodgates.

Their thoughts (and many others) were numerous and there are references all over the place.

 

@RWKindaguy doesn't need my help, but his describing the massive vote count swing in the wee hours of the morning has never been debunked. Similar suspicious stuff occurred in other places, like PA IIRC. GA officials dismissing the observers around 10pm, shortly before numerous boxes of ballots were delivered, has never been debunked. The Iphone tracking and a little (tiny) video showing the same persons going drop to drop box has never been debunked.

 

It's easy for them to say it's been debunked. That never requires proof on their part.

 

Not even close to the truth. You seem to like pushing forward fact free opinions here. The persons who brought out the boxes after the polls closed basically said "nothing to see here." and the MSM ran with it, thus the debunked narrative was born.

 

It has been debunked.

Your refusal to accept that means nothing.

 

LOL! You haven't followed this?

 

And many times over.

 

Neither does your fairy tale.

 

Mine is not a "fairy tale"

Trump tried to take his evidence to the courts. It was rejected. Every. Single. Time.

 

Rejected and didn't have standing are quite different. But you knew that when you lied about the courts.

 

Several of these cases were rejected because of lack of standing. But you knew about this when you lied about the cases.

 

This is 300+ counties with more than 100% voter turnout. How do you explain that happening again?

 

There were no counties with over 100% turnout. How do you explain this fake claim?

 

No…. This says more than 100% voted… meaning they exceeded possible voter turnout as in there is not enough registered voters to cover all the votes they got. You should reread the OP again

 

There is no evidence that "more than 100% voted." You should re-read the OP. And try to think of a real argument.

 

My bad. I’m the one that needed to reread it. You’re correct

 

I can't believe people still swallow that cockamamie bullshit about a "stolen election".

 

The corrupt FBI, CIA and IC rigged the election by lying about Hunter's laptop. 10% of Bribed Joe's voters stated in a polls that they would have not voted for Bribed Joe without that lie, well more than the 'margin' of victory. Bribed Joe is only in the WH because of a rigged election, and Bribed Joe is about 10 points behind last cycle, the voters that were tricked last time, not going to be tricked this time.

Trump's running stronger than in either of his last two cycles, but then we know what a Trump presidency is like, Peace, Prosperity, Rising Wages, Plentiful Goods and Services and Rising Living Standards.

 

simple, it's a crime to toss a invalid voter registration, even if it says "Mikey Mouse", why? to prevent people from tossing the other parties registrations

and of course some register and never vote for various reasons

 

The topic in question in the OP was an allegation that there were voter registration numbers that exceeded numbers of votes eligible to vote and therein they assert lies the problem.

You for some strange reason replied by stating that there are always more registrations than voters which did not speak to the OP. It was an irrelevant reply. You were not refuting its claim in any way.

Your explanation now, to be honest, is even more confusing.

 

the accurate statement is that more people register to vote in a given jurisdiction than those who actually vote because I cannot remember an election with 100% turnout. However, the issue are precincts or areas where more people VOTED than registered to vote. that is an indicia of fraud

 

nope, I am a registered voter, I do not vote every election, so the fact that more are registered then vote makes absolute sense

if I moved, I may be registered in two places, only vote in one

 

Ineptitude and self-dealing. Not to mention no leadership in response to Covid. We lost 2.9 million job, supply chains became ****ed up and people died---a clusterfuck.