GAY TEACHER READS HOMOSEXUAL STORY TO 3RD GRADERS

Too normal for you?

 

Generations of people adapted just fine without liberals cramming the perversion of HOMOsexuality down our throats through every possible venue 24/7. What's next, promoting pedophilia , incest , and bestiality , these are are also actual truths how people are different, but I don't want it presented or taught to 3rd graders !!!! Funny how you can't teach a legitimate moral life lesson from the Bible, but a Liberal Court rules you can teach and promote HOMOsexuality to 3rd graders. STOP THE INSANITY !!!!!! People we've got to stop voting Liberals into positions of power !

 

I have to say, I have seen typos of my username before, but this one takes the cake. No malice intended, just amusement at it.

For those same thousands of years, marriage has been, throughout many societies across the world: opposite sex, same sex, ghost marriages, polygamous (both polygyny and polyandry), monogamous, incestous, and so much more. One man one woman has never been the only marriage model, despite the Catholic Churches efforts.

Indeed it has, like it did when we stopped the unconstitutional blocking of interracial marriage. Not to mention that the foundations were altered when we started to make marriage a legal institution in addition to the social and religious institutions.

Yeah, the same thing that happened with interracial marriage.

 

I'm sorry for you and for your kids if that's the world you live in. There is another world .. one in which modern kids, raised with saturation technology, don't ever see that.

 

Just noting based upon what you said. Sexuality is a choice, and thus we shouldn't cater to it, straight or gay

 

If that's the only 'truth' you know, then you really need to get out more.

 

Do you think kids are all secretive little liars with a palette for adult sexuality?

Again, I'm sorry for you.

 

3.8% of the USA population are homo. It is not normal, hetero is.

Should we start praying 5 times a day because Muslims make up 1% of our population, should we teach our kids the Quran?

 

To be fair, gay people actually exist ... demonstrably. Gods ... well, the jury is still out on that.

 

To be fair, gay people actually exist ... demonstrably. Gods ... well, the jury is still out on that.

 

Adolescents have no business having sex .. and should be discouraged from dwelling on it. It doesn't factor into their lives at age 12/13/14 etc. Anyone encouraging adolescent focus on sexuality is problematic on a number of levels.

 

Reading a story is "cramming the perversion of Homosexuality" down your throat? Really?

Tell me, is that something you'd like to have taught in the schools? I'm surprised that you'd come up with those suggestions, since conservatives normally preach what they consider to be a good, clean lifestyle and those topics you broached betray you.

Well in that case it would behoove you to work to change the US Constitution so schools would have the right to teach moral lessons from the bible, Koran, Wiccan bible, etc

This isn't 1960 my conservative friend, people are starting to understand that the narrow world that many conservatives live in is re-pleat with ignorance and change is inevitable. Don't fight change, embrace it; you might find that it enhances your life to be tolerable to those who view the world different then you do.

 

They don't need to be 'taught' that there are different types of parents. That's like teaching kids that the sky is blue, and how they should feel about that particular shade of blue. Schools getting involved in philosophical topics is bull####.

 

double

 

But that isn't true. You just said something that is demonstrably not true. You need to read up on this topic, because you clearly don't know anything about the history of marriage.

 

This, exactly. Schools have no business discussion philosophy with children. They only way it would be legitimate is if they're teaching BOTH sides of the philosophical point and present both impartially and equally. EG, if 'gay rights' are ever discussed, equal time and merit must be given to anti-LGBT sentiment. But far better to remain silent on philosophical issues.

 

I encourage you to join us in the 21stC.

Do you seriously think parents teach their kids to treat others badly? Wow.

 

Macthecat;

I was thinking about Macisacat, but Macthecat is kinda cool.

"Many kinds of marriages...over thousands of years (a paraphrase)"

Yes, but those variations were condoned by that society, not by old guys in robes bucking the trend. Don't you think?

Interracial Marriage?

A different topic, but still an issue that was fought over marriage between a man and a woman.

Marriage as a legal institution in addition to a social and religious institution?

Sure, that is a better way to look at it-- as a secular union between two people.



Better to left it that way than to try and change society or religious institutions by calling it a marriage and prosecuting people who for their own reasons don't accept it.

That is big brother speaking.

Not accepting it today does not mean tomorrow won't change.

BTW:
I mentioned that gays subverting an election to get what they wanted was just like the Trump Hater claims that he went around another election to get the White House. You didn't say anything.

Why?

 

Gamewell45--This isn't 1960 my conservative friend, people are starting to understand that the narrow world that many conservatives live in is re-pleat with ignorance and change is inevitable. Don't fight change, embrace it; you might find that it enhances your life to be tolerable to those who view the world different then you do.

DDT
Looking at the Election results of 2016 from the White House down to dog catcher in practically every state, plus the last 4 special elections it really doesn't look like people are agreeing with your perverted liberal views !

 

Only if you failed to raise your kids to not seek that kind of grubby diversion.

 

Normal is simply a statistical value. Anything beyond that is subjective. If you feel that we should not cater based upon sexuality, then we don't do it based on any sexuality.

Nope, same principle. We don't cater to the Muslims, the Christians, the Wiccans, or the Atheists.

 

Elcrash;

"You just said something that is demonstrably not true,,,"?

Okay, you have the floor. demonstrate.

We won't say a word.

 

They don't have to have sex to be gay. But they still do have sexual attractions, whether they act upon them or not. And yes encouraging adolescent focus on even straight sexuality is problematic on a number of levels.

 

What on earth are you talking about?

 

I had my first sex education class in the 5th grade. This is nothing new. What is new is they are addressing the broader aspects of society.

Personally, I could care less. I don't have a dog in the hunt. I do think schools should stick to the academic skills. But more and more has been dumped on the schools and now they are responding to a changing society. There are kids who have two fathers or two mothers. Should they be treated like they don't exist? Children who are homosexuals are entitled to see their sexuality represented along with traditional standards, if they are to be addressed at all.

Parents have been dumping their responsibilities on the schools for decades and now you all whine about the result.

How about this? I don't have kids. Never did. I want a refund for all the taxes I have paid putting other people's kids through school.