There is no law that prevents homosexuals from marrying. Most homosexuals I know used to be married. Their sexuality just isnt relevant.
You're on ignore man. You are just obfuscating and wasting the time of thinking, reasonable, SANE individuals. Later.
That IS still an unanswered question, in my view. Republicans may eventually embrace "homosexuals" and "minorities"... but not anytime soon; it is obvious. No, that surely isn't the only answer. So do Democrats. (Why aren't those people also Republicans?) No, not completely. But I've met scores of people who are smart in some certain ways and not others. Some are as inept as rocks on certain issues. And really, only an abject FOOL thinks that Republicans are or will be "saviors" of the American economy. Actually, there is enough of a trail, to show that Republicans are behind some of the worst issues the American economy has ever suffered. Please, get real. And "GAY REPUBLICANS", you also need to be realistic about the reality that until the Right severs the umbilical cord of religious fundamentalists and overall social bigots... they'll be voting against their own interests... at least in one VERY important way.
Hard for me to see where they are coming from because I am heterosexual. But, if they are for freedom then why would they support a party that aims to limit their civil rights? Also, democrats certainly do believe in freedom and free enterprise, is "communist" view has been stirred up but the far right and it is harmful to America, no matter which party you support. I suppose the Darwinian clock iphas slowed down enough for imbeciles like this to exist.
People of faith don't bother me. People of faith who think they should or seek to control the lives of others... I can and do hold them in contempt.
The OP fails to mention that those organizations are economically conservative and not socially conservative like Mitt Romney.