get your vaccination and your booster shot

/\ /\ /\

That's the whole "Great utopian Reset" game in their DAVOS/U.N./WEF/World Bank Group/IMF Technocratic----> "nut-jobs" shell.

 

Their time is up.

THE Q TIMELINE - 2017 to Today - Everything you Need To Know - The Great Awakening -WE HAVE IT ALL!

 

~ As George Bush #1 "told" us when running for reelection — "A new world order . It will work. It has to work ." No real explanation. No Congress approval. No vote by the citizens.

• In a January 16, 1991 speech, George H.W. Bush identified the opportunity to build a new world order where the rule of law governs the conduct of nations, and in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the UNs founders.

An interesting observation of America's future from 2016 :

https://prospect.org/justice/new-world-dis-order/

 

I remember him talking sh!t like that, I'm not sure if he said it in that speech, but he did say in one of them, "a thousand points of light". Even Trump quoted him. Do you want to know what he meant by "a thousand points of light" ?

 

SHOCKING!!! Dr. Zelenko "The COVID-19 Vaccines Cause AIDS!" + Exposing "The Great Reset" Agenda

 

You guys must be very lonely in your "real lives". Zelenko is a lying quack,

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/zelenko-669-coronavirus-patients/

A more detailed explainer of the potential role of anti-malarial drugs like hydroxychloroquine against the COVID-19 coronavirus disease, with or without antibiotics, can be found here. Zelenko’s claims, however, rest solely on taking him at his word: He has published no data, described no study design, and reported no analysis.

 

Here is a letter, a response to someone's request. Decide for yourself what this letter means. I know.

 

Dr Vernon Coleman: ‘Something very dangerous is going to happen with the new Flu Jab’

 

It means that the department of health in Australia does not have that information. Somebody else asked the same question in FOI request related to:

1. Documentation proving isolation of the SARS-COV-2, Delta strain which is
confirmed by means of a purified viral sample being imaged with an electron
microscope
2. Documentation where the isolated SARSCOV2 Delta virus sample mentioned in
point (1) is exposed to healthy humans or animals and shown to cause the disease
COVID-19

The Answer:

https://www.righttoknow.org.au/request/7717/response/22502/attach/html/4/Attachment A Notice of Decision FOI 2777.pdf.html

Within the response to this FOI is a link — https://www.righttoknow.org.au/request/8049/response/23164/attach/5/Attachment B Daily Telegraph Friday 13 Aug.pdf?cookie_passthrough=1

It is an article that discusses how the department of health has received 633 FOI requests related to providing scientific proof of the existence of the Covid-19 virus.

The author of that article, Australia's Chief Medical Officer, states that he is aware of the letter advising that the department does not hold documents proving the existence of the virus is being posted on social media. He states that the extract of that letter has been posted on social media to mislead Australians and has been taken maliciously out of context.

 

Uh oh---you found another lunatic. It's almost as if you go looking for them.

https://mythdetector.ge/en/anti-vax-union-british-unlicensed-doctor-spread-conspiracy-theories/

NTI-VAX UNION, BRITISH UNLICENSED DOCTOR SPREAD CONSPIRACY THEORIES
Ani Kistauri
May 11, 2021 12:43
Reading Time: 4 minutes


827
VIEWS

20

4



On May 9, Facebook user Ketevan Gejadze published an appeal by Georgian Medical Union, which says that experimental vaccines are dangerous, they can cause millions of deaths, while vaccinated people pose a threat to their own as well as unvaccinated people’s health, because their immune system becomes unprotected. To back up her words, the author of the post cites the research by Dr. Vernon Coleman.

On May 7, Facebook user “სამყარო სამყარო” spread Vernon Coleman’s video, where he suggests that vaccines may kill more people than COVID-19. Coleman notes in the video that vaccines are part of experimental gene therapy. He links the coronavirus pandemic to “the Agenda 21” and “Great Reset” ruled by “evil elite” that allegedly aims at achieving depopulation globally.

The appeal spread by anti-vaxxers, as well as Vernon Coleman’s video contains conspiracy theories and several pieces of disinformation.

Conspiracy theory No.1: “Great Reset” and “Agenda 21” is a scenario plotted by “evil elite” to achieve depopulation and seize total power.

Coleman claims that the coronavirus pandemic is the goal of globalist elites to gain total control on humankind and achieve depopulation globally. In fact, the Great Reset is not a secret plan, but rather the initiative developed by the World Economic Forum in 2020 to find long-term solutions to the COVID-19 crisis and its consequences.

“Agenda 21” Coleman is talking about was adopted by the United Nations Conference on Environment & Development in Rio de Janerio, Brazil in 1992. The document focuses on global social and economic challenges, as well as sustainable development. It is not secret and does not aim at destruction of humankind.

In the video, Coleman also mentions Bill Gates as a representative of global elite, noting that the Microsoft founder tries to achieve depopulation through compulsory vaccination that is not true. In fact, the purpose of vaccination is to reduce child mortality in developing countries, which, according to Bill Gates, is a precondition for economic growth. Conspiracy theorists frequently spread Bill Gates’ quotes about vaccines out of context.



Disinformation No.1: The coronavirus vaccine, in fact, is a dangerous, experimental gene therapy.
Fact No.1: Working mechanisms for COVID-19 vaccines and gene therapy are different.

Coleman says in the video that the coronavirus vaccines are experimental gene therapy. In fact, mRNA vaccines are not gene therapy because they do not alter recipients’ genes.

Lead Stories fact checkers also verified Coleman’s identical remarks. Dr. Douglas Drevets, chief of infectious diseases at Oklahoma University Health Sciences Center, said in a February 3, 2021, email to Lead Stories that the mRNA vaccination does not alter any genes/DNA. “It simply instructs our immune cells to make an immune response against toxins,” he said.



Disinformation No.2: COVID-19 vaccines have not been created to prevent virus transmission, while vaccinated people pose a threat to unvaccinated people, because vaccines do not reduce virus transmission.

People who already received their doses of COVID-19 vaccines authorized by the World Health Organization (WHO) do not transmit the virus to others.

The Centers for Disease Control’s COVID-19 Clinical Team said in an email responding to Reuters questions that there is no way for a COVID-19 vaccinated person to “shed vaccine.” “COVID-19 vaccines give instructions to teach our cells how to make a protein—or even just a piece of a protein—that triggers an immune response inside our bodies. The immune response, which produces antibodies, is what protects us from getting infected if the real virus enters our bodies.”

The information that vaccines do not reduce virus transmission lacks evidence. The UK trial of the vaccine produced by the University of Oxford and AstraZeneca swabbed participants every week, and estimated a 49.3% reduction in asymptomatic infections. According to Nature, a British weekly scientific journal, even when the vaccines do not fully rule out asymptomatic infections, the trials carried out in Israel show that vaccinated people (with Pfizer and AstraZeneca) are less transmittable. Another research conducted through cooperation between the Israeli government and Pfizer showed that vaccination reduces both symptomatic (93.7%) and asymptomatic (89.4%) infections.

The U.S. research released in March 2021 found that the risk of asymptomatic COVID infection among vaccinated healthcare workers was reduced fourfold in 12 days after receiving a vaccine. The study conducted by Harvard School of Public Health showed that one dose of vaccine reduces the potential for transmission by at least 61%. According to another U.S. study released on March 29, 2021, Pfizer and Moderna vaccines reduced the risks of infection (both symptomatic and asymptomatic) among healthcare workers, firefighters, law enforcement and teachers by 90%.



Who is Vernon Coleman?

Vernon Coleman is a British doctor and a writer, but he is not on the Medical Register and may not practice as a doctor in the UK. In 2019, Coleman wrote a book, in which he denied the existence of AIDS and expressed mistrust towards vaccines. The honorary doctorate and the professorship awarded to Coleman both derive from the same awarding body, the International Open University, which, according to Independent, was founded in the Soviet Union, moved to the Netherlands and is now based in Sri Lanka. Foreign media outlets (Reuters, Politifact, Guardian, Scientificamerican) wrote about Coleman’s anti-vaccine opinions and conspiracy theories on multiple occasions.

The article has been written in the framework of Facebook’s fact-checking program. You can read more about the restrictions that Facebook may impose based on this article via this link. You can find information about appealing or editing our assessment via this link.

Read detailed instructions for editing the article.

 

Only the best scientists push their "studies" on Youtube and bitchute! Dude, your discernment is terrible.

https://www.politifact.com/factchec...id-19-vaccines-are-not-weapons-mass-destruct/

In a nearly 22-minute long Facebook video, a man who identifies himself as Dr. Vernon Coleman has a lot to say about the COVID-19 vaccines.

The video post is titled, "Covid-19 Va@xines Are Weapons of Mass Destruction - and Could Wipe out the Human Race." (The misspelling of "vaccines" is intentional — it helps posters avoid Facebook’s moderation of anti-vaccine misinformation.)

"We all know that the evil elite — the Agenda 21 and Great Reset promoters — have all along intended to kill between 90 and 95% of the world’s population," Coleman says in the video. "Sadly I fear it’s already too late to save many of those who’ve had the vaccine. Millions are doomed, and I fear that many will die when they next come in contact with the coronavirus."

Coleman also goes on to reiterate that he believes the vaccines "could kill more people than COVID-19," and that it "now seems likely that the vaccines may be responsible for the deaths of hundreds of millions who haven’t been vaccinated."

The post was flagged as part of Facebook’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Facebook.)

This is not the first time PolitiFact has debunked Coleman’s conspiracy theories about the coronavirus vaccines.

The largely self-published British writer has denied the existence of HIV/AIDS and in 2019 authored a book aimed at discrediting trust in vaccines.

A qualified and practicing general practitioner in the 1970s, Coleman is no longer licensed to practice medicine. The UK’s Advertising Standards Authority has also repeatedly taken issue with how Coleman’s work is advertised and promoted.

The video’s claim about the COVID-19 vaccines is rooted in what have come to be referred to as the "Great Reset" and "Agenda 21" conspiracy theories.

 

Exactly! If there was a virus, don't you think they'd have information on it? Because they don't, ...................? Not too difficult to work out.

 

@Nemesis @MuchAdo

Denialism

From Wikipedia,

For denialism of historical events, see Historical negationism.


Banner at 2017 Climate March in Washington D.C.
In the psychology of human behavior, denialism is a person's choice to deny reality as a way to avoid a psychologically uncomfortable truth.[1] Denialism is an essentially irrational action that withholds the validation of a historical experience or event, when a person refuses to accept an empirically verifiable reality.[2]

In the sciences, denialism is the rejection of basic facts and concepts that are undisputed, well-supported parts of the scientific consensus on a subject, in favor of ideas that are radical, controversial, or fabricated.[3] The terms Holocaust denial and AIDS denialism describe the denial of the facts and the reality of the subject matters,[4] and the term climate change denial describes denial of the scientific consensus that the climate change of planet Earth is a real and occurring event primarily caused in geologically recent times by human activity.[5] The forms of denialism present the common feature of the person rejecting overwhelming evidence and trying to generate political controversy in attempts to deny the existence of consensus.[6][7]

The motivations and causes of denialism include religion, self-interest (economic, political, or financial), and defence mechanisms meant to protect the psyche of the denialist against mentally disturbing facts and ideas; such disturbance is called cognitive dissonance in psychology terms.[8][9]

 

@Overitall I wish the you the best of luck:

 

You're showing desperation now.

 

Hundreds, if not thousands of Doctors and Virologist have disclosed that SARS-CoV-2 is pure pseudo-science nonsense and have even proposed a direct challenge to the governments deceptive covid medical garbage being passed off as FACT.

Below is their "challenge" to those who are duping the naive public with this SARS-CoV-2 pandemic/virus nonsense.


SETTLING THE VIRUS DEBATE

“A small parasite consisting of nucleic acid (RNA or DNA) enclosed in a protein coat that can replicate only in a susceptible host cell.” 1

It has been more than two years since the onset of the “corona” crisis, which changed the trajectory of our world. The fundamental tenet of this crisis is that a deadly and novel “virus”, SARS-CoV-2, has spread around the world and negatively impacted large segments of humanity.

Central to this tenet is the accepted wisdom that viruses, defined as replicating, protein-coated pieces of genetic material, either DNA or RNA, exist as independent entities in the real world and are able to act as pathogens. That is, the so-called particle with the protein coating and genetic interior is commonly believed to infect living tissues and cells, replicate inside these living tissues, damage the tissues as it makes its way out, and, in doing so, is also believed to create disease and sometimes death in its host – the so-called viral theory of disease causation. The alleged virus particles are then said to be able to transmit to other hosts, causing disease in them as well.

After a century of experimentation and studies, as well as untold billions of dollars spent toward this “war against viruses”, we must ask whether it’s time to reconsider this theory. For several decades, many doctors and scientists have been putting forth the case that this commonly-accepted understanding of viruses is based on fundamental misconceptions. Fundamentally, rather than seeing “viruses” as independent, exogenous, pathogenic entities, these doctors and scientists have suggested they are simply the ordinary and inevitable breakdown particles of stressed and/or dead and dying tissues.

They are therefore not pathogens, they are not harmful to other living beings, and no scientific or rationale reasons exist to take measures to protect oneself or others against them. The misconceptions about “viruses” appears to largely derive from the nature of the experiments that are used as evidence to argue that such particles exist and act in the above pathological manner. In essence, the publications in virology are largely of a descriptive nature, rather than controlled and falsifiable hypothesis-driven experiments that are the heart of the scientific
method.

Perhaps the primary evidence that the pathogenic viral theory is problematic is that no published scientific paper has ever shown that particles fulfilling the definition of viruses have been directly isolated and purified from any tissues or bodily fluids of any sick human or animal. Using the commonly accepted definition of “isolation”, which is the separation of one thing from all other things, there is general agreement that this has never been done in the history of virology. Particles that have been successfully isolated through purification have not been shown to be replication-competent, infectious and disease-causing, hence they cannot be said to be viruses. Additionally, the proffered “evidence” of viruses through “genomes” and animal experiments derives from methodologies with insufficient controls.

The following experiments would need to be successfully completed before the viral theory can be deemed factual:

1. a unique particle with the characteristics of a virus is purified from the tissues or fluids of a sick living being. The purification method to be used is at the discretion of the virologists but electron micrographs must be provided to confirm the successful purification of morphologically-identical alleged viral particles;
2. the purified particle is biochemically characterized for its protein components and genetic sequence;
3. the proteins are proven to be coded for by these same genetic sequences;
4. the purified viral particles alone, through a natural exposure route, are shown to cause identical sickness
in test subjects, by using valid controls;
5. particles must then be successfully re-isolated (through purification) from the test subject at 4 above, and demonstrated to have exactly the same characteristics as the particles found in step 1.

However, we realize that the virologists may not take the steps outlined above, likely because all attempts to date have failed. They now simply avoid this experiment, insisting that what they say are “viruses” cannot be found in sufficient amounts in the tissues of any sick person or animal to allow such an analysis. Therefore, we have decided to meet the virologists half way. In the first instance, we propose that the methods in current use are put to the test. The virologists assert that these pathogenic viruses exist in our tissues, cells and bodily fluids because they claim to see the effects of these supposed unique particles in a variety of cell cultures. This process is what they call “isolation” of the virus. They also claim that, using electron microscopy, they can see these unique particles in the results of their cell cultures. Finally, they claim that each “species” of pathogenic virus has its unique genome, which can be sequenced either directly from the bodily fluids of the sick person or from the results of a cell culture. We now ask that the virology community prove that these claims are valid, scientific and reproducible. Rather than engaging in wasteful verbal sparring, let us put this argument to rest by doing clear, precise, scientific experiments that will, without any doubt, show whether these claims are valid.

We propose the following experiment as the first step in determining whether such an entity as a pathogenic human virus exists…

STEP ONE
5 virology labs worldwide would participate in this experiment and none would know the identities of the other participating labs. A monitor will be appointed to supervise all steps. Each of the 5 labs will receive five nasopharyngeal samples from four categories of people (i.e. 20 samples each), who either:

1) are not currently in receipt of, or being treated for a medical diagnosis;
2) have received a diagnosis of lung cancer;
3) have received a diagnosis of influenza A (according to recognized guidelines); or who
4) have received a diagnosis of ‘COVID-19’ (through a PCR “test” or lateral flow assay.)

Each person’s diagnosis (or “non-diagnosis”) will be independently verified, and the pathology reports will be made available in the study report. The labs will be blinded to the nature of the 20 samples they receive.
Each lab will then attempt to “isolate” the viruses in question (Influenza A or SARS-CoV-2) from the samples or conclude that no pathogenic virus is present.

Each lab will show photographs documenting the CPE (cytopathic effect), if present, and explain clearly each step of the culturing process and materials used, including full details of the controls or “mock-infections”. Next, each lab will obtain independently verified electron microscope images of the “isolated” virus, if present, as well as images showing the absence of the virus (presumably, in the well people and people with lung cancer). The electron microscopist will also be blinded to the nature of the samples they are analyzing. All procedures will be carefully documented and monitored.

STEP TWO
ALL of the samples will then be sent for genomic sequencing and once again the operators will remain blinded to the nature of their samples. It would be expected that if 5 labs receive material from the same sample of a patient diagnosed with COVID-19, each lab should report IDENTICAL sequences of the alleged SARS-CoV-2 genome. On the other hand, this genome should not be found in any other samples.

(Note: this statement is a brief outline of the suggested experiments – a fully detailed protocol would obviously need to be developed and agreed upon by the laboratories and signatories.)

If the virologists fail to obtain a satisfactory result from the above study, then their claims about detecting “viruses” will be shown to be unfounded. All of the measures put in place as a result of these claims should be brought to an immediate halt. If they succeed in this first task then we would encourage them to proceed to the required purification experiments to obtain the probative evidence for the existence of viruses.

It is in the interest of everyone to address the issue of isolation, and the very existence, of alleged viruses such as SARS-CoV-2. This requires proof that the entry of morphologically and biochemically, virus-like particles into living cells is both necessary and sufficient to cause the appearance of the identical particles, which are contagious and disease causing.

We welcome your support and feedback for this initiative.

Signatories,

Thomas Cowan, MD
Jitendra Banjara, MSc
Mufassil Dingankar, BHMS
Andrew Kaufman, MD
Paul McSheehy,
Saeed Qureshi, PhD
Amandha Vollmer, NDoc

Mark Bailey, MD
Kelly Brogan, MD
Michael Donio, MS
Valentina Kiseleva, MD
Prof. Timothy Noakes, MD
Stefano Scoglio, PhD
Michael Yeadon, PhD

Samantha Bailey, MD
Kevin Corbett, PhD
Jordan Grant, MD
Christine Massey, MSc
Sachin Pethkar, BAMS
Mike Stone, BEXSc

 

I am?

What's next--you're gonna tell me to "have a good day"?

 

You should have seen him on the old Cornfieldonline forum. It was desperation parody so intense that he actually put himself into a "self-imposed" EXILE!

LMAO!

 

I'm not aware of even posting in this thread. For you to use it as a platform to introduce an ad hom is surely an act of desperation.

 

On the contrary my covid and covid vax entertainer. This is your reality.

 

Man, I'm just so desperate to defeat fake science theories!

 

I do recall that speech, I've seen it a few times since.

 

If you want to do that it might help if you learn how to stay on topic. :lol

 

So the medical professionals that are coming forward with proof and evidence that these covid shots are dangerous who are practising their Hippocratic oath are all liars? Nice reality you live in.

 

Oh no! George Bush let the cat out of the bag! And, there's no doubt that he meant the same "new world order" as the conspiracists, too!