Global Warming Alarmists Resort to Hoax

Wow, your basic reading comprehension is actually non-existent. If you can't even understand a sentence that simple I'm done here.

I'll repeat it for your benefit with the bits you glossed over in bold.

You said:
Are you seeing the other documents are called fake?

I said: Yes, I'm seeing you call the documents fake even after you have been shown they are not.

You are the only clueless moron who thinks they are fake. Heartland themselves said they weren't fake. Why you are pushing this inane argument is proof of your intellectual incompetence.

Now, answer my question: Do you see that the documents, in reality, are not fake?

 

It is the second time you are accepting that you are seeing the other document are called fake now. You have even bolded that you are seen that other documents are called fake.

Now let the public see how long it will take you to answer Yes or No to other 2 statements

quoted from a week ago:

http://www.politicalforum.com/envir...g-alarmists-resort-hoax-4.html#post1060974554

"Confirm that:

3. You are seeing NO confirmation, no evidence that they are fake.


4. Thus the conclusion that they are insignificant and unimportant, is stupid, it is idiotic, oxymoron [I apologize if I am not quoting your lexicon fully and exactly]; it is contrary to all facts, there is no logical reason behind it."

Then I will demonstrate to the public you pedaling away from your “Yes” repeated twice and even bolded by you. I may do it sooner because it will take another week or 2 for you to give a direct answer.

 

Next time read the entire post.

I said: Yes, I'm seeing you call the documents fake even after you have been shown they are not.

Calling the documents fake is meaningless as it is an imaginary scenario dreamed up in your head. You are delusional. Your other questions don't even make sense and are just more inane deflection from the critical point you keep running away from: Do you see that the documents, in reality, are not fake?

I don't blame you. This is the most inane argument I've seen someone put forward in a long time. I'd call you a troll for this level of retardation but a troll would make his stupidity less obvious.

 

No.
or more exactly ,

No. I do not see that the documents, in reality, are not fake



Are you seeing a question and an answer above?

[REM: to the public ; Not even a single warmist is as we will see in the next steps]

take it as an example.

Are you seeing other documents called fake now?

 

Other documents are fake.

 

Thankyou for confirming you are denying the facts. Nothing more needs to be said.
Posted via Mobile Device

 

You’ve made up so much out of 2 letters N and o .

All I need is to show that not even a single warmist is seen other documents being called fake.

Not even a single warmist is capable of giving an answer to a simple question, in this case – “are you seen other documents are called fake?”

All warnists do is spinning, twisting and making things up.

This particular spin started weeks and posts ago from a spin:


http://www.politicalforum.com/envir...g-alarmists-resort-hoax-2.html#post1060953966

After usual for all warmists spitting a personal insult you stated:
“Seeing as it has been called a fake. No.”

And you continued twisting and spinning. In each and every sentence. It is what all warmists does not matter if they are posters on PF or a PhDs, does not matter how a warmist call himself, - Dr. Mann or NASA, or Academy of Science or the overwhelming majority of the scientific community.

This is all I demonstrate for the public to see that AWG is a hoax. I thank you for participation:


http://www.politicalforum.com/envir...25-we-need-worry-about-38.html#post1060925192

http://www.politicalforum.com/envir...e-4000-gallons-per-acre-4.html#post1060964604

http://www.politicalforum.com/envir...th-nasa-satellite-finds-2.html#post1060952939

 

Heartland haven't called the documents fake. To insist they have is delusional.

 

You’d made up so much out of 2 letters N and o. Now you have made something out of nothing.

All I need is to show that not even a single warmist is seen other documents being called fake.

Not even a single warmist is capable of giving an answer to a simple question, in this case – “are you seen other documents are called fake?”

All warnists do is spinning, twisting and making things up.

This particular spin started weeks and posts ago from a spin:


Global Warming Alarmists Resort to Hoax

After usual for all warmists spitting a personal insult you stated:
“Seeing as it has been called a fake. No.”

And you continued twisting and spinning. In each and every sentence. It is what all warmists does not matter if they are posters on PF or a PhDs, does not matter how a warmist call himself, - Dr. Mann or NASA, or Academy of Science or the overwhelming majority of the scientific community.

This is all I demonstrate for the public to see that AWG is a hoax. I thank you for participation:
http://www.politicalforum.com/envir...e-4000-gallons-per-acre-4.html#post1060964604

http://www.politicalforum.com/envir...25-we-need-worry-about-38.html#post1060925192
http://www.politicalforum.com/envir...th-nasa-satellite-finds-2.html#post1060952939

 

Pointlessly repeating statements that have been proven false = you