it taints the perception of his work but can we really prove that? Gomerts and other members of those committees spewed hatred at Strzok does that automatically taint their "investigation" of him?
It began before Gingrich. Long before. It's been a tool of extremism used by both sides as long as I can remember, and it has only gotten worse with each passing year. There's a boatload of calls for violence and murder by some on the left against anyone who opposed their gun control agenda going back decades. It's all unconscionable, regardless of your political orientation.
It's Strzok but you made me grin. Hannity pronounces his name as Stroke. Peter Stroke. Subliminal or intended pun?
You want to "cut the crap"?? Okay, bubba, let's cut the crap: Your unequivocal statements about whether I watched the inquiry or not are ignorant and presumptive, and I certainly never said I didn't watch it, so feel free to get over yourself regarding that aspect. I have spoken to several individuals in Federal law enforcement (where I myself once served) about the proceedings, and the general consensus is the FBI is soiling its collective drawers in fear that a lot of heads are going to start rolling regarding their unprofessional and politically motivated behavior in recent years. Of course the FBI's lawyers are frantic to keep all that dirty laundry from being aired in public! You express a description of events that in my opinion is nothing short of delusional; colored by your own biases and agenda. You want a !#$%^& scholarly presentation on WHY I hold that opinion? Sorry; I calls it like I sees it, and I don't give a flying fornication whether you like it or not. In closing, don't bother responding because I'm done wasting my time on you.
I know that there are gun control freaks out there but I did recall calls for vilolence and murder as there has been by the anti abortion freaks. Have any NRA officials been hurt? I hope not because that would obviously be as wrong as killing doctors who work in woman's clinics orvwho are abortion providers, right?
Information about ongoing investigations might have to be held in closed door sessions, but congressional oversight makes congress eligible to receive any and all information. Just because a FBI lawyer told Strzok he can't answer certain questions (one wonders why) doesn't make it so. And surprise: the white house owns all of it..... period..... end of story.
it's good to see republicans attack these FBI agents for not acting politically correct on government phones failing to act in a political correct way has consequences it gave the appearance of bias you want a private conversation, use your private phone like Trump does
Arrogant and condescending? Yeah... We definitely watched the same one. But those are the attributes that Trump love, aren't they? However, the reason Democrats "cheered" for him (figuratively speaking) was not because of his "magnetic personality". It was the fact that he withstood the hypocrites in the Republican Party. All this show because they wanted information that they are not entitled to. Even asking for it was absolutely unethical. And he told them again and again. And FBI attorneys had told them again and again before the interrogation. You know why? Because the last time this Congress got confidential information about an ongoing investigation, Republicans ran to Trump to tell hm all about it. You can't have that! Trump is under investigation and... It's idiotic to expect them to make the same mistake twice. They asked anyway. And... whatta ya know.... they got nothing! The arrogant condescending creep won!
This story is a little way from being over and I bet that it isn't going to turn out the way you think it is. We will all have to wait and see.
Well, you know... Republicans have control of the presidency, the House, the Senate, the Supreme Court... Trump appointed scores of U.S. Attorneys... What more would they need to put them in jail? Oh... I know! Evidence that they committed a crime! Damn tje technicalities! What are you talking about? Nobody has started any investigation about Trump. They started an investigation about the Russians. Everything else they have found came as a result of that.
if they get it we will know, as they are trump supporters and they leak, same happened to Clinton, leaks.... why no leaks about Trump? he was under investigation too and of course after the memo, we know republican leaks are just spin, when they had to release them we saw just what idiots they think the public is
More than a few people affiliated with the 2nd Amendment protection movement have been threatened and more than one has been hounded into having to pack up and move from their homes out of fear of threats to their families. I know Colion Noir actually had to move his elderly mother out of her home when someone posted her name and address on a public forum as part of a threatening message. Obviously, threatening someone or even following through on threats on someone merely because you have political differences is nothing less than evil. I still remember seeing an interview where a man who was supposedly a Catholic Priest was sitting there defending the actions of a man who had murdered a women's health services doctor over abortion, and that so-called "priest" enraged me and horrified me in equal measure for his smugly self-righteous, self-serving tone. .
Wrong wrong wrong! They can oversee all they want after the investigation is over. But they don't have a right to information about an ongoing investigation. This is written in their own rules and was read during the meeting. Which you would have known if you had bothered to watch the proceedings..
The information that Strzoc was instructed not to reveal about the ongoing investigation. Did you even watch it? I posted a video with one of the relevant parts just a few posts above yours.
I agree that there is no excuse for threthening someone with bodily injury or threatening their family over a political dispute. It dies happen from both sides. Anyonevwho claims that one side or the other does not do it is either blind or lying.
Finally! How many times did I have to ask? Ok. You did say you didn't see Gowdy hiding during the Bannon vote, but... that's crap... So let's see where you "cut" it. Instead of "cutting" you're just adding more crap. An organization as big as the FBI you are very likely to find Trump cultists just like you find them out on the street. Still waiting for the part where you start "cutting" instead of "adding" Oh no! Please don't tell me this is going to be just another iteration of the same old Trump Cult "Deep State" Conspiracy Theory! Why is it that when the right runs out of real arguments, they always have to resort to fabricating a conspiracy theory? OMG. How I overestimated you! I actually took you seriously for a while there. You didn't address anything. You didn't refer to the Strzok interrogation. You say you "call it"... but you don't even state what it is you are calling. Myself, on the other hand. Now knowing what you really stand for, would not even dream of missing the chance to unmask you at every opportunity.
remember the republican that threatened to throw a member of the press off the balcony, it was caught on video, many republicans still supported that guy there are crazies out there on both sides, but they should not hold powerful positions "Republican Rep. Michael Grimm Threatened to Throw a Reporter Off a Balcony" https://www.thenation.com/article/republican-congressman-threatens-throw-reporter-balcony/ seems that threatens freedom of the press
Why is it that when the hard left runs out of real arguments, they dismiss reality as a "conspiracy theory" and accuse everybody and their mother of being part of "the right"? Great tactical ostrich act you've got going there. LOL! Bubba, you ain't got a CLUE about what I "really stand for", and the only one "unmasked" as a nutjob is you. You want to follow me around, snapping at me like a schnauzer, go for it; but don't be surprised if you get kicked in the face for your trouble here and there.