Good for Strzok!

Nonsense... They believed in 98% chance of Hillary's victory and did not see a reason to rock the boat and leak information that did not appear necessary, could potentially backfire and/or damage the FBI's reputation.

 

I get it.Because those Lisa Page and Peter Strzok tweets and e-lmails
were ALL so dagburn well-written.
What are you some kind of unique NuT ?

 

Plus you done forgot ... those he { Strzok } rode in on.
The Dimocrat gaggle of goose-stepping control freaks.

 

He was not asked that many questions. Most of the pro Trump brigade just wanted to hear themselves talk.

 

Hey, they successfully kept you from posting negative about Kavanaugh!!!!! ππ¶

 

I don't know if they were well written or not. Who cares?

Do I also need to mention that, besides writing complete sentences, it would also be nice if you at least had a point?

 

Hillary exonerated before the investigation.

Trump guilty before the investigation.

Yea, no bias anywhere to be found.

 

So........you didn't get a chance to watch the hearings. If you had, well, honestly you'd probably have posted the same lies. If this was the Repubs chance to make their baseless point about Strzok.........wow............what a complete failure. I particularly liked the part when they asked him to explain one of the texts Repubs have taken out of context and then cut him off as he was explaining.

I thought this was of note............

Republicans’ favorite FBI conspiracy theory goes up in smoke during Strzok hearing

https://thinkprogress.org/peter-str...before-his-hearing-even-started-c6504664d7c2/

Before the question-and-answer portion of Strzok’s testimony began, he read a statement in which he highlighted that if the FBI was indeed in the bag for Clinton, they had a very counterproductive way of showing it.

“There is… one extraordinarily important piece of evidence supporting my integrity, the integrity of the FBI, and our lack of bias,” Strzok said. “In the summer of 2016, I was one of a handful of people who knew the details of Russia election interference and its possible connection with members of the Trump campaign. This information had the potential to derail and quite possibly defeat Mr. Trump, but the thought of expressing that or exposing that information never crossed my mind.”
...................................................................................................................................................
One other thing to point out. Dems are very eager to have the transcript of Strzok's non-public testimony released to the public. No doubt because it further makes the Repub case look as ridiculous as it did today. There is no other way to describe the performance of the Repubs but a national embarrassment and a disgrace.

 

Is that all you control freak Liars have.? That I don't complete
sentences.How about trying to complete some Facts.
Notice how Facts were kinda unnecessary when those gaggle
of Dimocrat clowns had their turn at questioning this Strzok creep.

 

Presumably he got high fives all around from the devil and his minions, corporeal and otherwise - not from anyone else, that's for sure.

 

You should try posting facts, what you post is delusional muldoonery.

 

Because they're Goin' Down.For Subverting a general election.
And the abject Framing of candidate Donald Trump.
Criminal referrals first then the Trials.

 

I imagine you're talking about Trump, since he did insult an immigrant family of a fallen war hero.

 

Sounds like a witch hunt to me. A hunt for disloyal witches in the FBI.

 

Unlike Your Boy Obama who insulted an entire movement
{ The Tea Party } with use of the porn word :
TeaB*ggers
Now what do you have to say fir yerself.?

 

Eventually,history will show that accurate analysis is being mistaken for bias. We already see people from both parties who believe Trump is an amoral, unethical, classless, ignorant jerk, unfit for the office. As time passes, with the benefit of perspective, this will not be considered as bias, but as historical fact.

 

They called themselves baggers until somebody told them what it colloquially meant.

They said it themselves. Nobody else had to make it up. Ooops.

 

So then Obama { so smart with nothing but smart policies }
was ignorant of this fact or knew like the Benghazi attack
what the word actually meant and was just foolin' around to test
how stupid he believes Joe Ameican.

 

So... you're telling us you are only now discovering that crimes occur before they're investigated?

How funny!

 

Strzok did fine. The zealots hardly let him answer a question because they were too busy creating public opinion against the FBI as part of their strategy of dismantling America to hand it over to Putin.

The right is raving about how Strzok showed himself to be this or that, but all they have to fuel that BS is their own character assassinations of Strzok. Typical right wing tactic today: create a fantasy about alleged evils of someone, complain about this evils over and over and over, and declare the person to be evil. Then when people say "what evil?" just point to the repeated fantasy.

Truth and patriotism has taken a distant back seat to national destruction and dreams of totalitarianism.

 

Man I hate this stuff.

 

And of those asked how many did he even attempt to answer rather than refusing?

 

Yes. We are fully aware your cnn talking points were already laid out for you before the hearing even took place. Hell I bet you had already written this entire post days ago.

 

Iv always wondered how anyone could actually think this stupid bullshit spin is even remotely good in any way. Like, you actually used this as your argument to prove the hearing when good for you guys. It doesn’t and it didn’t. You understand right that if you HAD leaked that information out during the election, he would have spent the rest of his life in prison. He is fully aware of that fact. That’s why he didn’t release it then. Because he and all his little compatriots truly believed there was no possible way in hell thier god queen Hillary could lose. So why in the hell would they risk going to prison for the rest of their lives doing something they believed wouldn’t even necessary? It’s one of the top 5 stupidest things Dems have come up with over this

 

You mean "a point"? I can't speak for all my fellow control freak liars. But I can say that it's the only thing this control freak liar has: A point, and the facts that support it.

Oh oh.... I see, what you're saying: You mean to say that I'm not the first control freak liar to point out to you that what you write is unintelligible because you don't complete your sentences...

Huh! Such a coincidence! Go figure...