That's the fault of President Twitter. If he wants his comments to have context, he should prepare public statements and write things like an intelligent person who is able to string more than two thoughts together at once.
No he let his bias give hillary a free pass, while attacking Trump because of some facebook newsfeed posts.
The fact is, you don't know what lurks behind those guilty pleas and cooperation agreements with the Special Counsel. You have no idea where the Mueller investigation is or where it is going. All we have are those indictments, guilty pleas, and incarceration. That's it. We do, however, know how guilty men act. Discredit the investigators.
As they say, beauty is in the eye of the beholder I think he came off looking like Gestapo agent in Berlin
And sepctacularly so. Trump is acting like someone accused of robbing a bank who doesn't just deny robbing the bank, but even denies the bank exists at all. Bizarre behavior.
Again, erasing context is the SOP of the left's MSM machine. I'm constantly reminded, and have so complained, that the President gives too much credit to portions of his audience who aren't capable of reaching their own conclusions, and must rely on a propaganda machine to tell them what to think about what he is communicating.
Trump says he hardly knows Manafort and that he only worked for him a couple weeks in a low level position....lol
Except that Trump's campaign manager is a bagman for the Russian mob who is presently in jail for witness tampering and twenty felony charges and his deputy campaign manager has turned State witness against them. Nothing about Russia....rofl...You guys are either totally delusional or involved in the same deep cover operations that Strozk has been busting for decades.
And there comes the requisite personal attack. I have no doubt why you don't believe people can see the obvious.
As Mueller claimed in court, no evidence will be presented about any Russian connection. Try to keep up.
No, it was an attack on your comment. And a ridiculous comment it was, and I don't think you believe it.
Mueller Will Not Present ‘Collusion’ Evidence at Manafort’s Fraud Trial https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.na...manafort-collusion-evidence-wont-be-used/amp/
And now you believe you can read my mind. You're checking all the boxes. Why do you think the left's media machine eliminates context as normal procedure when going on their hourly crusades against the President? I make a habit of posting links and direct transcripts from the President's comments when countering their dog whistles. Not all the time, but when the debate calls for it. It's almost universal across all the left's media outlets that they ignore context. As a result, the resulting narrative they are pushing is almost always total BS. So why do they do it?
Doesn't matter what Strzok came across as. Important thing is that Republicans did not get the information they wanted but are not entitled to have.... or even ask for. Strzok held steady to his professional obligations. Thus leaving Republicans screaming at him personal insults, and baseless threats to prosecute him for meeting his obligations... like complete idiots who place their own political interest and the defense of a criminal President before the defense of their Nation and the Constitution.