Gov. Little signs ‘Fetal Heartbeat Bill’ into law, protecting the lives of the preborn

An arrogant voice against the unborn would not be here posting.

Your accusations against Republicans are so amusing given you vote for the party that has crashed America with tons of laws starting not in 1950 where I proved this happens, but in 1933 when FDR went on a law making rampage.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
FoxHastings said: ↑
Another thread about how Anti-Choicers delight in the thought of women losing their rights.

And, as usual, righties do not think ahead, of consequences.

How willing will they be to have their taxes raised to support MORE poor children ?.

How willing will they be to have their taxes raised for more schools....and school lunches for poor kids?

...and taxes raised for more court cases, more jails for those "Evil Women", more support for the care of children of incarcerated women.

They haven't been willing for their taxes to be used for any entity that aids poor children.....Will they change? I doubt it..


...and,of course, they have no practical solutions as to HOW abortion would be investigated or proven...

.and they FLEE from stating how these "murdering" women should be punished...

Nope, they just do the Happy Dance because they are making women's lives harder...







HUGE DODGE of the post of mine you quoted.
Copied from post 17 : """"
DUHHHHH,if I had been aborted there would be nothing to imagine....melodramatic claptrap doesn't address the post !!!!

HUGE DODGE of the post of mine you quoted. Sorry you do not understand written English.

 

SO awfully AUTHORITARIAN......

 

Show me even one law put out by Democrats to protect children.

 

Clear sign you are that arrogant. So self centered you expand font to display your arrogant importance.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
Another thread about how Anti-Choicers delight in the thought of women losing their rights.

And, as usual, righties do not think ahead, of consequences.

How willing will they be to have their taxes raised to support MORE poor children ?.

How willing will they be to have their taxes raised for more schools....and school lunches for poor kids?

...and taxes raised for more court cases, more jails for those "Evil Women", more support for the care of children of incarcerated women.

They haven't been willing for their taxes to be used for any entity that aids poor children.....Will they change? I doubt it..


...and,of course, they have no practical solutions as to HOW abortion would be investigated or proven...

.and they FLEE from stating how these "murdering" women should be punished...

Nope, they just do the Happy Dance because they are making women's lives harder...







HUGE DODGE of the post of mine you quoted.
Copied from post 17 : """"
DUHHHHH,if I had been aborted there would be nothing to imagine....melodramatic claptrap doesn't address the post !!!!







HUGE DODGE of the post of mine you quoted. Sorry you do not understand written English.

LOL, I'll ignore the personal attack because I know you really don't have any answers...but it's odd you keep responding to a post that you can't address....it draws attention to the FACT that you can't address it …


That's what the large font is for, too

 

What TF does that have to do with authoritarian Republicans trying to dictate women's lives and take their rights away???...

YOU show ME one social program FOR CHILDREN the AUTHORITARIAN Republicans haven't tried to end or cut funding to....

 

HELL NO. YOU REFUSE TO REPLY TO MY COMMENTS.

 

Pro-choice activists have always perpetuated lies while refusing to accept medical and scientific advancements over the past five decades.

Have you ever asked someone who is pro-choice to answer this simple question: “What is abortion?” Try it. They’ll never directly answer. Here’s why.

The pro-abortion movement is wedded to euphemisms and misinformation. Jessica Valenti, a well-known feminist author, recently wrote in a guest essay for the May 13 issue of the New York Times that “the primary political strategy of abortion foes relies on the claim that abortion is brutal and dangerous, a myth that is much harder to perpetuate when people can easily access medicine to safely end their pregnancies at home.” This represents a fundamental misrepresentation of pro-life arguments.

Pro-choice activists have always perpetuated lies and mischaracterizations while refusing to accept medical and scientific advancements over the past five decades. It is the only reason the abortion movement survives. The entire abortion movement relies on failing to deal with the reality of abortion on its terms. This is because acknowledging the fundamental truth of abortion — a procedure that violently ends the life of a human being — would be the undoing of the movement. You’ve seen this in some of the nervous dread shown by abortion proponents after the announcement that the Supreme Court would take up a case concerning the permissibility of Mississippi abortion regulations, as proponents sense that the edifice of lies that they’ve built up over the years — with the Court’s help — may be threatened.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2021/05/abortion-always-kills-a-baby/

 

LOL, great claim but untrue and the proof is there...all anyone has to do is scroll back....

 

She's correct..

No, Anti-Choicers have said abortion is brutal and dangerous.

What lies....????
And it's the Anti-Choicers, mostly righties, who can't face the science...hate science and mistrust it...

Abortion survives because women have abortions as they have had for centuries..

It not a violent death...that's emotional unscientific clap trap...

No, it's worry that Really Sick people who hate women and want to destroy their basic human right making them slaves and breeding animals will use their influence to once more purposely make women's lives harder...

LOLOLOL...GEE, such an UNBIASED website!! NOT ...LOL"abortion always kills a baby""....and they claim Pro-choicers lie !!!! Hilariously stupid...

 

From your post with a twist :"""Have you ever asked someone who is Anti-CHOICE to answer these simple questions: Try it. They’ll never directly answer.

FoxHastings said: ↑
Another thread about how Anti-Choicers delight in the thought of women losing their rights.

And, as usual, righties do not think ahead, of consequences.

How willing will they be to have their taxes raised to support MORE poor children ?.

How willing will they be to have their taxes raised for more schools....and school lunches for poor kids?

...and taxes raised for more court cases, more jails for those "Evil Women", more support for the care of children of incarcerated women.

They haven't been willing for their taxes to be used for any entity that aids poor children.....Will they change? I doubt it..


...and,of course, they have no practical solutions as to HOW abortion would be investigated or proven...

.and they FLEE from stating how these "murdering" women should be punished...

Nope, they just do the Happy Dance because they are making women's lives harder...

 

To be "authoritarian" means enforcing strict obedience to authority, especially that of the government, at the expense of personal freedom. Wouldn't that be the result of the law you sight which is at the expense of women's personal freedom?

 

Why would you support instant death?

 

Whose "instant death"?

Are you talking about the ZEF?

Yes, it's an instant death, not the prolonged torture Anti-Choicers make it out to be.

Don't you support "instant death" in the case of a woman being impregnated by a rapist?

 

You support the instant death of the woman's liberty and pursuit of happiness, don't you?

I

 

I am a huge supporter of liberty for all.

 

Except women?

 

So far I have asked you a half dozen questions that you refused to answer. Now you ask me why would I support instant death? If you are supporting the Idaho law then you are "supporting instant death" as well because it does not ban all abortions. See how you twist things, like calling a fetus a baby or a child. To gain sympathy you mislabel it a different stage of development. Would it be honest to call an adolescent an adult if it gave the adolescent more rights?
To answer you honestly, if the question is do I support abortion. The answer is no. I don't support face lifts either. If someone wants to have one, it's their right and their choice, but I don't go around telling people they need one.

 

And how will they be able to maintain tneir facade of being "Pro Capitalism" while criminalising an entire field of the health care and medicine market? How will they be able to claim to be Pro American while opposing the woman's right to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness while opposing the separation of church and state?

 

Unless they are unwillingly pregnant, eh?

 

Not if there are people, like women, that you don't think should have the same liberty as "all"...

 

Well, he thinks they do... Until they fall in love or get sexually attracted to a man and decide to pursue that.

 

I was unaware of your half dozen unanswered questions.
I only vote here. I do not run the congress of Idaho and sure do not force the Governor to sign laws.
There is nothing wrong when I agree with them and laud them.
Why would you dehumanize the unborn? Let's get this over with. I value all human life. It is a shame we have to get a lower crime rate by using merely abortion. Did you ever see that film 1984?

 

All humans. (I support liberty for all of them)