Grassley: Burisma executive who allegedly paid Biden has audio recordings of conversations with Joe,

You said I missed something.
Want to retract now?

 

You're the one that said I missed something.
Want to retract now?

 

I think they are. If there are recordings then play the recordings. It couldn't be more simple.

 

NO, and here it is again.

You missed something.
“Today, FBI officials confirmed that the unclassified FBI-generated record has not been disproven and is currently being used in an ongoing investigation,

 

There are no tapes. No evidence to suggest that those tapes exist PERIOD. What Grassley is doing is a purely political stunt similar to what Sen. McCarthy did in the UnAmerican Activities Committee. It is just history repeating itself.

You may want to look at why FD 1023 was used by the FBI. It is a form to jot down the interview with someone who has no credibility. If the FBI releases the after action memos of what they attempted to verify in that interview and came up with nothing, then what will you do then? Blame the FBI again?

 

The House congressional committee can take ten more years and they still won't find any evidence of wrongdoing because there is none. They are just throwing mud at the wall and that's it. Rep Comer is claiming that since the money is coming from China, then it must be illegal, and then claim there is a lot of it. The only thing he has proven is money went from Point A to Point B to Point C and that is it.

For this to be money laundering, there has to be something more, something more concrete, not just the money transfers. And bear in mind, this was all done based on a proposed business venture in China. Nothing more, nothing less. Nothing illegal about that, is there.

 

Even Sen Grassley thinks the tapes do not exist. From this article, "Republican Senator Chuck Grassley admitted that he doesn’t actually know if the audio recordings that he said reveal Joe Biden accepting a bribe even exist."

 

Even the CEO of a company is an employee of the company. And the President is like a CEO. Technically, the President is an employee of the government, it is just that as President, he has great discretion in what he can and cannot do on certain matters under the law. He has, under the law, designate authority to the various agencies in the Federal Government. And since his salary comes from the Federal government under a quarterly basis, then yes, he is an employee of the government.

 

Comer says a lot of things, but that does not mean they will come true. I think Comer is trying to get Joe Biden's Brother to testify. Currently, James Biden is caught up in a federal lawsuit. But this is separate from the alleged corruption by Hunter Biden that Comer is pursuing.

https://www.knoxnews.com/story/news...jim-accused-fraud-federal-lawsuit/1901987001/

 

you missed it again... lol

 

Except the rightists will never become more tolerant of all people and include all people to be treated equally and without discrimination.
So, forget R's becoming more like democrats.

 

nor did Hilary, she did the right thing when she got that information after democrats paid the research firm sometime after Rubio fired them in May 2016, a few months before the election

she could have been like Trump and used it vs turning it over to the FBI like she was supposed too

Marco Rubio ended it after he lost the primaries (this is the part republicans want you to forget)

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/25/us/politics/steele-dossier-trump-expained.html

"During the Republican primaries, a research firm called Fusion GPS was hired by The Washington Free Beacon, a conservative website, to unearth potentially damaging information about Mr. Trump. The Free Beacon — which was funded by a major donor supporting Mr. Trump’s rival for the party’s nomination, Senator Marco Rubio of Florida — told Fusion GPS to stop doing research on Mr. Trump in May 2016, as Mr. Trump was clinching the Republican nomination."

 

Maybe it's the lefts grand scheme to have a possible convicted R candidate as the nominee for president.

Most I's won't vote for a probable criminal who won't give back stolen documents that belong to the USA gov't.

 

Oh, most non partisans know that real well.
You can never have an adult conversation with any partisan. Each side only knows the facts as they have been told.

fact: someone claims there are tapes of biden
fact: No one has seen or heard these tapes, yet.

 

Republicans are starting to admit there is no tapes, seems they got their base all excited, now they want them, lol

you can't say something exists, then expect people not to demand to see it

"Republicans Acknowledge Biden Bribe Audio Might Not Exist"

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/joe-...pe-might-not-exist_n_648a24e9e4b06725aee43979

"The allegation that Biden was caught on tape has seemingly forced Republicans to remind an eager conservative media that the allegations might be untrue. "

 

Hanging one's hat on "not been disproven"?
Today, FBI officials confirmed that the Existence of Bigfoot has not been disproven and is currently being used in an ongoing investigation

 

I have no problem with Biden being investigated or put in jail if guilty.

But from what I have read, what we have is a second hand story that the tapes MIGHT exist or that there might be a witness. These stories
have a way of either slowly growing, or slowly disappearing when supporting evidence either appears or disappears.

I'll hold off judgement on this for now.

Either way, it's time for our political parties to come up with better candidates ... old, senile and possibly corrupt vs. old, insane and corrupt is hardly
a way to run a country.

 

Well then, we may as well get rid of elections and just have the bureaucratic state pick and choose which leaders they believe are best for us. I mean, nothing really screams "democracy" quite like "the person you elected works for us, not you".

 

One comment for your rebuttals to me on the House investigation.
You seem worried.

 

exactly

 

First it was a F%KKIN taped diary, something specifically outling in PRA

Second no prosecutor had that, it was Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch, the right winger who Diaper Donnie listened to about him witholding his documents from DOJ instead of listening to his actual lawyers!

AT LEAST LEARN THE CASES YOU GUYS ARE TRYING TO PUSH AS 'PROOF' DIAPER DONNIE IS INNOCENT!

 

A nonseqeteur argument.

 

Not worried at all.

 

Your points of view say otherwise. At least that is how they come across to me.
You really don't know that there is nothing to this investigation. My interpretation of your words is that you're convincing yourself and the reader that there isn't. I'm willing to wait to see how it all plays out.

 

Folks, how much smoke does there need to be before you realize there’s a fire?

Burisma execs set up bank account for Hunter Biden that was shut down for money laundering violations: report

Hunter Biden had executives at Burisma set up a bank account for him at a bank that later closed because of a money laundering investigation.

Emails taken off of Hunter Biden's laptop reveal that he provided Burisma executive, Vadym Pozharskyi, with his passport and multiple bank statements to open up an account with Satabank in 2016. The bank went under due to money laundering investigations in 2018.

https://thepostmillennial.com/buris...t-down-for-money-laundering-violations-report