Happy Fathers Day...Gender Restriction For Gay Families

Call it whatever you like.

 

Still showing your 'ignorance', I see.

 

No, demonstrating the extent of your state of denial.

 

I cannot accommodate the 'fantasy' you wish to perpetuate within your own mind.

 

Of course not. Just don't force children of lesbian, or single parent families to write a card for a family member not in their life.

 

Stop making sense, it isn't allowed.

 

That's pretty redonkulous. <A made up silly word for how stupid this is.

Let the child make a card for one parent for fathers day and the other for mothers day. Problem solved. There is no need to force the child to make a card for a father she has no contact with. It's idiotic and quite cruel.

 

I just posted the picture. The gays are the ones perpetuating, what you consider to be a myth.

 

You are saying nothing worthwhile.

 

You dont see it as worthwhile because it demonstrates your state of denial.

 

Say what you want, I'll let others judge. You put up what is essentially an 'advertisement', and think that actually refutes my point. I'm almost amused.

Stop wasting your 'electrons'.

 

Thats because it does refute your point quite nicely. I know you fancy yourself as the official spokesman on all matters relating to homosexuality, but the gays seem to be ignoring you. They embrace their "gay lifestyle", promote and celebrate their lifestyle, while you sit their looking rather foolish proclaiming that it does not exist.

 

No, it refutes nothing in the meaning of what I actually communicated. I think you're being ridiculous. Still, you and others are free to disagree with me.

 

What you communicated was

It might be ignorance, but it is the gays ignorance. They embrace and celebrate their "lifestyle". Didnt you and I determine earlier that you, individually, simply have no "style", gay or otherwise

 

Here is the "gay lifestyle" from the perspective of a gay

By Hilary White

LONDON, September 10, 2008 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A British homosexual journalist admits that his documentary on the London gay scene is likely to "burn every bridge in the gay world I’ve got."

Simon Fanshawe is a writer and broadcaster who created the documentary "The Trouble With Gay Men" after becoming increasingly alarmed at the shallowness and destructiveness of the "gay lifestyle." The film, made for BBC 3 television, questions the emotional and psychological immaturity, narcissism, nihilism and self-destructive tendencies of many in the homosexual community. Fanshawe says he wants homosexual men to "grow up" and get beyond their state of "extended adolescence."

Fanshawe, who was involved in the early homosexualist political movement, says, "We’ve fought discrimination and prejudice, only to wreck ourselves with drugs and wild sex."

In his documentary Fanshawe admits that the homosexualist movement has in the main achieved its political goals of equalising homosexuality with natural sexual relations, in abolishing laws against sodomy and creating legal equivalency with marriage and adoption. Given these achievements, Fanshawe asks, "Why do we seem hell bent on behaving like eternal teenagers?"

"We’re hooked on vanity, and regard older men with contempt. Despite AIDS we’re still chasing the ultimate sexual high and what’s more are determined to wreck ourselves on designer drugs. We’re happy to assist the straight world in keeping alive the image of all gay men as limp-wristed queens."

He says that he has recently "started to worry" about the ways in which "gay liberation is celebrated" in his hometown of Brighton, a major centre of the homosexual subculture. At the annual "Mr. Gay" beauty pageant, which he describes as a "pathetic display of self-delusion", Fanshawe tells a contestant, "I’m old enough to remember when all those women were fighting against Miss World…What we’re all saying about ourselves is that actually to be really gay, properly gay, what you’ve got to be is cute, and young."

"Extreme vanity" he says, has been "sewn into gay culture." It "is now so mainstream in the gay community that otherwise intelligent young men are happy to be treated as sex objects on a demeaning meat rack."

Gay men, he says, are so "hardwired" towards finding casual sexual encounters, some going as far as plastic implants to enhance their appearance, that finding genuine intimacy is "practically impossible."

"Vast amounts of our leisure time are organised around sex, straight or gay. But what gay men have done is organise our identity around sex. And that is corrosive. And to make things worse, promiscuity has become the norm."

The documentarian asks the proprietor of a gay sex bath house, "Paul", who had just related some graphic stories of group sexual encounters in the establishment, "Are we just swimming around in a sewer which we’re just sort of saying is normal?"

For objecting to the lifestyle of pursuing casual and "extreme" sex and for holding genuine human intimacy as a goal, Paul told Fanshawe that he is "the closest thing to a straight person in a gay man’s body I have ever met. There should be an operation for you, dear."

Paul was adamant and forthright in his belief that the gay lifestyle is incompatible with happiness and fidelity in human relations, expressing his dissatisfaction with civil unions legislation. "The temptation of other things will always stand in the way of two gay men having a long-term, loving, caring relationship."

Fanshawe says he is horrified at the lack of emotional involvement and at the willingness of men to engage in "unsafe sex." The film includes statistics that show the deadly consequences of the homosexual lifestyle. One in nine gay men in London is HIV infected and new cases of HIV have doubled in the city in five years. Incidences of syphilis have increased in the same time period 616 per cent.

"Unsafe" sex, he says, is not the only way in which gay men are self destructive. "If there’s a new drug, gay men will find it and take it," he states.

At one point Fanshawe interviews a homosexual man who has "done all the drugs" and now campaigns in gay clubs against the growing use of crystal methamphetamine. The man, who could not be identified for fear of reprisals from drug dealers, said that crystal meth is preferred in the gay community because it reduces the inhibitions and allows sex to be brought to an "animalistic" level "devoid of emotion." The film says that one in five gay men in London use crystal meth.

http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/archive/ldn/2008/sep/08091011

 

It is their resistance or hitting back at ignorant, limited and bigoted mindsets such as yours; you are not fathoming that, so it appears. You took and ad which MOCKS your stance on most things you relate.

Personally, my life (and those of many others who are homosexual) don't fit the stereotypical "lifestyle" that some bigots imagine; it just doesn't. Many "gay" people are even married TO THE OPPOSITE SEX and have children (as we tend to find out later in their lives).

As I already implied, if you think that advertisement of a single event reflects the actual lives of homosexual people, you would be a 'fool'.

In any case, if you (or someone who is essentially an ignorant fool) decides to believe that homosexuality is a "lifestyle", then that is upon you or them to deal with. Don't expect gay people to respond amicably or be tolerant of such foolishness.

 

So, you bought that hook, line and sinker? No wonder you don't appear to understand much in reality.

It's just sad.

 

The gays proclaim it to be a lifestyle, who am I to argue with them?

 

So now you are also an expert on the London gay scene? Why would you not buy it?

 

??? It reflects the existance of a "gay lifestyle" that you so vehemently deny its existance.

 

I hope you're smarter than your self-expressions here tend to illustrate.

 

You really should be ignored; but I challenge you so that others will at least see a question mark (of sorts) in the thread.

 

You have a problem with seeking to stereotype all homosexuals. And many of your posts surely tend to illustrate the same.

 

As a gay dude I have to admit that there is somewhat of a gay lifestyle. While I do not precipitate in it, nor do my friends, nor my partner; it does exist to an extent. Most straight guys are in it for sex with women, chicks are usually the more resistant one (some of them anyway) because they don't want to be labeled are are more stimulated emotionally. When you have two guys they are already thinking about the same thing so what do you think is gonna happen?

Stereotypes are usually based on some source of fact. About 1/4th of the gays give the rest of us a bad name. Most of us, you straight people don't see. We are the ones working on our doctorate and starting companies, we are your lawyers and your doctors, we are just like you with one difference. Who we love is none of your business, who we live with and care for is none of your business. But do not discredit all of us because of the actions of the few.

Back on topic... this story just shows how bigoted/stupid people are, the teacher should be fired because of her actions to that poor kid. Educators should never make a child feel they are not normal or something is wrong with them or their their family. Both of these women are her mommies, if the biological father wanted to be a part of her life he would be, and then maybe the little girl could draw her daddy (and both of her mommies on mothers day).

 

I can agree with most of your post. Even so, I would strongly emphasize the notion that "homosexuality" itself, is not a "lifestyle" (because it is not).