The above is quoted from #24 of these points and I notice that some of these points are mixed and not focused, taking the fact that the airliner pilots never set the "we B hijacked" code on the transponder, is a point in and of itself and additionally, the point about the hijackers never appearing on the airport video cams that must have been present at the departure point airports is yet another independent point. However with that said, I think its a very good idea to question everything.
You assume this would be a normal hijacking where the hijackers demand the pilots to fly them somewhere instead of killing the pilots to fly the plane themselves. BTW, they captured Flt77 hijackers on video at the airport.
even if this were a "normal" hijacking where the radicals insisted on being taken to central America or? why wouldn't the pilots set the unique code on the transponder to indicate they had been hijacked? Reference to pix please.....
Most people still think that their Congresscritters actually work for the rank&file Voters/taxpayers. ya, right..........
This makes the assumption that the hijackers gained entry into the cockpit at the very first second of the operation and killed the pilot & co-pilot without having any time even for them to say anything over the radio. If the pilot&co-pilot were aware at all in any of the 4 flights, why wasn't the HIJACKED code set on the transponder, at the very instant that the event was known about.
tangent #99 If the Pilots had communicated with AirTrafficControl the fact that they were being attacked, this would have set off alarms big time, what was said? do YOU have the magical INFORMATION? what is there? The fact is that there were no hijackings! The perpetrators have been very careful to destroy evidence. and make very sure that nothing remains that could demonstrate conclusively that 9/11 was an inside job. The gaping holes in the whole story shows conclusively that there has been evidence tampering and total fraud going on here. Things like who said what and when, can be faked very easily however things that are more hard evidence like the presents or absents of transponder signals being orders of magnitude more reliable as evidence. My question remains, where is the hard evidence that ties the whole thing together? what? destroyed by the perpetrators?
The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account Cannot Be True David Ray Griffin Jones, Steven E., 2006. "Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?" In Griffin and Scott, eds., 2006. Heller, David, 2005. "Taking a Closer Look: Hard Science and the Collapse of the World Trade Center," Garlic and Grass, Issue 6, November 24 (http://www.garlicandgrass.org/issue6/Dave_Heller.cfm). Hoffman, Jim, 2003. The North Tower's Dust Cloud: Analysis of Energy Requirements for the Expansion of the Dust Cloud Following the Collapse of 1 World Trade Center, Version 3, 9-11 Research.wtc7.net, October 16 (http://911research.wtc7.net/papers/dustvolume/volume.html). _____, 2004. Your Eyes Dont Lie: Common Sense, Physics, and the World Trade Center Collapses, 9-11 Research.wtc7.net (http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/radio/youreyesdontlie/index.html). _____, 2005. Building a Better Mirage: NIST's 3-Year $20,000,000 Cover-Up of the Crime of the Century, 911 Research, August 21 (http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/nist/index.html). Hufschmid, Eric, 2002. Painful Questions: An Analysis of the September 11thAttack. Goleta, CA: Endpoint Software. Killough-Miller, Joan, 2002. The Deep Mystery of Melted Steel, WPI Transformations, Spring (http://www.wpi.edu/News/Transformations/2002Spring/steel.html). King, Jeff, 2003. The WTC Collapse: What the Videos Show, Indymedia Webcast News, November 12 (http://ontario.indymedia.org/display.php3?article_id=7342&group=webcast). Lavello, Randy, n.d. Bombs in the Building, Prison Planet.com (http://www.prisonplanet.com/analysis_lavello_050503_bombs.html). Meyer, Peter, n.d. Did the Twin Towers Collapse on Demand?, Section 3 of The World Trade Center Demolition and the so-Called War on Terrorism, Serendipity (www.serendipity.li/wtc.html). _____, 2005b. WTC Basement Blast and Injured Burn Victim Blows 'Official 9/11 Story' Sky High, Arctic Beacon, June 24 (http://www.arcticbeacon.com/articles/article/1518131/28031.htm). Griffin, David Ray, 2004. The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions about 9/11 and the Bush Administration. Northampton, MA: Olive Branch (Interlink). Glanz, James. 2001. Engineers Are Baffled over the Collapse of 7 WTC; Steel Members Have Been Partly Evaporated, New York Times, November 29. Bollyn, Christopher, 2001. Some Survivors Say Bombs Exploded Inside WTC, American Free Press, October 22 (http://www.americanfreepress.net/10_22_01/ Some_Survivors_Say__Bombs_Expl/some_survivors_say__bombs_expl.html). Baker, Jeremy, n.d. PBS Documentary: Silverstein, FDNY Razed WTC 7, Infowars.com (http://www.infowars.com/print/Sept11/FDNY.htm).
Who among the "debunkers" totally agrees with Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney, The entire Bush Crime Family, & for that matter Clinton (etc... ) included, for this is NOT a strictly Republican or Democrat issue, its about criminals willing to do ANYTHING to promote their agenda.
13) Towers were built to withstand a Boeing jet(s). “I designed it for a 707 to hit it”, Leslie Robertson, WTC structural engineer. “Could probably sustain multiple impacts of jetliners”, “like a pencil puncturing screen netting” Frank De Martini, deceased Manager of WTC Construction & Project Management. “As far as a plane knocking a building over, that would not happen.” Charlie Thornton, Structural Engineer. The Towers were built to withstand a Boeing low on fuel making a landing and a slower speed, not full of fuel and top speed and that was theoretical, not a proven tested fact and the fire containment was never designed to contain fire on so many floors with damaged fire systems so that is an apples to oranges comparison that has nothing to do with the actual events plus the buildings were not 'knocked over'. This is how the conspiracy theorists package their conspiracy by leaving out critical data that is relevant. The results of real life experience certainly falsified the engineering theory.
So if WTC1, 2 were destroyed by aircraft impacts, what is responsible for the destruction of WTC7? also WHY is it that the towers "collapsed" as they did? in order for the observed result to have happened, every weld, bolt ( etc .... ) in each tower would have to fail exactly on time, not too soon & not to late to create the observed result. How was that done?
