House GOP demands unredacted records of Biden using pseudonym while VP

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by flyboy56, Aug 18, 2023.

  1. flyboy56

    flyboy56 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2013
    Messages:
    15,626
    Likes Received:
    5,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    There is only one reason to use a pseudonym and that is to deceive. This is what Joe Biden did while he was VP. We also know Biden shared an exclusive business phone with his son Hunter and his business associates. Biden also used burner phones. These are methods criminals use to hide their illegal activities. My guess is the DOJ will continue to ignore the evidence against Joe and his family. LIAR!

    https://nypost.com/2023/08/17/comer...ed-records-of-biden-using-pseudonym-while-vp/

    WASHINGTON — House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer asked the National Archives on Wednesday to hand over any unredacted records in which President Biden used a pseudonym during his vice presidency — as Republicans move closer to launching an impeachment inquiry into his role in son Hunter’s foreign business dealings.

    Emails previously released by the Archives and retrieved from Hunter’s abandoned laptop reveal that Joe Biden used the email address “Robert.L.Peters@pci.gov” while he was President Barack Obama’s second-in-command and that his aide John Flynn cc’d Hunter on 10 emails containing the elder Biden’s daily schedule between May 18 and June 15, 2016.

    Comer’s request covers records using Biden’s other known pseudonyms — “Robin Ware” and “JRB Ware” — and makes pointed requests for certain documents, such as drafts of Biden’s December 2015 speech to Ukraine’s parliament.

    “Joe Biden has stated there was ‘an absolute wall’ between his family’s foreign business schemes and his duties as Vice President, but evidence reveals that access was wide open for his family’s influence peddling,” Comer (R-Ky.) said in a statement.
     
  2. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    42,182
    Likes Received:
    33,063
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    For Republicans to have so much evidence they sure seem to be jumping from one item to the next without anything really sticking.

    I think we need to remove the teflon title from don and give it to brandon.
     
  3. Oldyoungin

    Oldyoungin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2013
    Messages:
    22,596
    Likes Received:
    6,136
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gets better everyday.
     
    ButterBalls likes this.
  4. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,356
    Likes Received:
    39,270
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    What hasn't stuck?
    The payments?
    The shell companies?
    The lies about The Big Guys involvement?
    The Big Guys expenses being paid out of the proceeds?

    You've refuted none of the above.
     
    ButterBalls, CornPop, Moolk and 3 others like this.
  5. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,356
    Likes Received:
    39,270
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    And further

    Pseudonym Joe: How Biden used personal email to share some government business with son Hunter

    In late November 2014 -- before the rest of the world knew that American Martin O'Connor was about to be released from detention in Turkey -- the U.S. embassy in Istanbul sent an email to the State Department that was then forwarded to senior advisers to then-Vice President Joe Biden, the Obama White House point man for many foreign policy crises.

    "The lead attorney for Mr. O'Connor reports that the court granted the detention appeal and he expected Mr. O'Connor to be released from jail today, barring any unforeseen problems," the U.S. embassy in Istanbul wrote in an email that got forwarded to top Obama administration security and diplomacy officials, including current Undersecretary of State Victoria Nuland. "Mr. O'Connor will not be allowed to leave the country until his next hearing which is set for December 11, 2014. The lawyer expressed confidence that he will be able to leave after that hearing. The attorney is handling his release arrangements, pick up and temporary housing near his law firm's office. Istanbul consular plans to speak with Mr. O'Connor after his release."

    State Department officials forwarded the information to the vice president's office, where Biden aide Colin Kahl (now President Biden's Undersecretrary of Defense for Policy) sent it to the private email account robinware456@gmail.com. It wasn't just any private account. It was one of three pseudonym accounts used by Joe Biden.

    Soon after the then-vice president would forward the information to his globetrotting son Hunter Biden with the subject line "Fwd: Mr. O'Connor Being Released from Detention today."...

    ...Comer's inquiry was prompted by an email quietly released in January as part of the Obama presidential archives. In it, a White House staffer writes Joe Biden on a personal pseudonym email account named Robert L. Peters about a planned call with then-Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko. The staffer copied Hunter Biden's email address at Rosemont Seneca Partners.

    At the time, Hunter Biden served on the board of a Ukrainian gas company called Burisma Holdings that was deemed to be corrupt by the Obama-Biden State Department.

    "Boss--8:45am prep for 9am phone call with Pres Poroshenko. Then we're off to Rhode Island for infrastructure event and then Wilmington for UDel commencement," the staffer wrote the then-vice president. "Nate will have your draft remarks delivered later tonight or with your press clips in the morning."
    https://justthenews.com/accountabil...ws-app&utm_campaign=external-news-aggregators

    The Big Guy, Joe, was up to his eyeballs in the influence peddling and information being passed on undercover of fake emails.


     
    ButterBalls, CornPop, Moolk and 3 others like this.
  6. Oldyoungin

    Oldyoungin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2013
    Messages:
    22,596
    Likes Received:
    6,136
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Id wager that the bulk of liberals know this is all true, but they have to deny deny deny to keep the Trump is evil narrative alive. Deep down in their logical parts of the brain, they know they arent being honest about what's going on with the Bidens. Note for mods- This is not about any specific users here at PF. I also don't claim its every single democrat is bad!
     
    ButterBalls likes this.
  7. Quantum Nerd

    Quantum Nerd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2014
    Messages:
    18,133
    Likes Received:
    23,597
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sure thing, a .gov e-mail address is used to hide things. You guys are a hoot.

    Maybe, if they try really hard, they can find the person who issued that e-mail address. My guess: This will disappear in the trash heap of RW disinformation within next week.
     
    Endeavor, Pants, cd8ed and 1 other person like this.
  8. Tipper101

    Tipper101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2008
    Messages:
    6,150
    Likes Received:
    3,250
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Typical lib: declare something innocent with no explanation why it’s being hidden in the first place. Classic classic lib.

    Newsflash: it shouldn’t require digging at all to get to the bottom of something innocent. Like. Duh.
     
    FatBack and mngam like this.
  9. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,356
    Likes Received:
    39,270
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

    ROFL
    Democrats Say It’ll Take A Lot More Than Eyewitness Testimony, Bank Records, Audio, Video, Complete Confessions For Them To Believe Biden Did Anything Wrong

    WASHINGTON, D.C. —
    As evidence of bribery and corruption by the Biden family continues to mount, Democrat lawmakers in the nation's capital have expressed heavy skepticism, saying they will need a lot more than just eyewitnesses, financial records, audio and video recordings, and admissions of guilt from parties involved for them to believe any of it.

    "Nah, I'm not buying it," said California Congressman Eric Swalwell. "If you're wanting me to believe President Biden and his family have been involved in a far-reaching money-for-favors scheme for years, you'll need to show me a lot more than rock-solid, irrefutable evidence. If the Biden family was corrupt, I think I would have heard about it from my Chinese spy girlfriend.".....
    https://babylonbee.com/news/democrats-say-itll-take-a-lot-more-than-eyewitness-testimony-bank-records-audio-video-complete-confessions-for-them-to-believe-biden-did-anything-wrong?utm_source=The Babylon Bee Newsletter&utm_medium=email

    Satire is only funny when it is based on a reality and the left demonstrates it regularly
     
    Independent4ever and FatBack like this.
  10. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    42,182
    Likes Received:
    33,063
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    All of these are for Hunter.

    You people do understand this is two different people, yes?

    What shell company has been proven to be controlled by Joe?
     
  11. grapeape

    grapeape Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2015
    Messages:
    17,175
    Likes Received:
    9,510
    Trophy Points:
    113
    BS

    Here is where you righties loose any and all credibility. You keep claiming that Joe made all this money, and how he used his office to enrich himself, and yet Donald Trump literally did this out in the open when he was POTUS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    You claim Hunter used his dad to get deals and make money, and yet Ivanka and Jared got $2 Billion very publicly from the Saudi government WHILE WORKING IN THE WHITE HOUSE.

    So in your world, if Hunter comes out and says “yes I made money because my dad was POTUS”, you will then go after Jared and Ivanka ?
     
    Endeavor, cd8ed and mdrobster like this.
  12. Pants

    Pants Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2018
    Messages:
    12,907
    Likes Received:
    11,347
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    How many more times do you expect the Dems here at PF to say 'bring it on'? We have all said that if there is compelling evidence - enough to get an indictment - it MUST go to trial. So I don't understand how, with the new evidence that seems to fill this board daily, why there hasn't been a grand jury? Are Repubs that disorganized or is the evidence that flimsy? Or is it that they are waiting for him to be out of office? And to suggest that it's all a conspiracy and being held back by DOJ and Biden - they've already proven that isn't the case.
     
  13. The Mello Guy

    The Mello Guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Messages:
    110,078
    Likes Received:
    37,804
    Trophy Points:
    113
    None of those are crimes
     
    Endeavor likes this.
  14. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,356
    Likes Received:
    39,270
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I asked you

    What hasn't stuck?
    The payments?
    The shell companies?
    The lies about The Big Guys involvement?
    The Big Guys expenses being paid out of the proceeds?

    You've refuted none of the above. Do you agree to stipulate all of those occurred?
     
    Independent4ever likes this.
  15. The Mello Guy

    The Mello Guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Messages:
    110,078
    Likes Received:
    37,804
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Let’s say I agree, so what? None of that is illegal.
     
    Endeavor likes this.
  16. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,356
    Likes Received:
    39,270
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    They are all for the Biden family. Joe doesn't have to be in control of them he doesn't even have to personal benefit, although we have that confirmed by Hunter, just to have facilitated it. Why do you think we have all the emails and text messages cautioning everyone not to mention his name? Why do you think we have the fake email address and the information being passed between them and Hunter being copied on classified information?

    What hasn't stuck?
    The payments?
    The shell companies?
    The lies about The Big Guys involvement?
    The Big Guys expenses being paid out of the proceeds?

    You've refuted none of the above. Do you agree to stipulate all of those occurred?
     
    AmericanNationalist likes this.
  17. Oldyoungin

    Oldyoungin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2013
    Messages:
    22,596
    Likes Received:
    6,136
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Interesting take, thanks for sharing!
     
    grapeape likes this.
  18. flyboy56

    flyboy56 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2013
    Messages:
    15,626
    Likes Received:
    5,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    After hearing of Hunter’s plea deal gift I would think you’d know who owns the DOJ?!
     
    Lum Edwards likes this.
  19. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    42,182
    Likes Received:
    33,063
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    So you don’t have anything attaching Joe to this besides words from a known crack head that openly lies to make money and imply influence?

    Let us know how that works out for you in court and in they court of public opinion.
     
  20. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,356
    Likes Received:
    39,270
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You don't have anything to refute the facts except your simple baseless dismissals. Lack of rebuttal noted again.
     
  21. AmericanNationalist

    AmericanNationalist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2013
    Messages:
    41,188
    Likes Received:
    20,959
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Same thing Hillary said about Bill cheating with Monica Lewinsky(turned out that he did in fact, cheat.)

    Not every Republican investigation is 'disinformation'. One side does not have all of the good angels, a fact in human history that's good to remember for all of us.
     
  22. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    42,182
    Likes Received:
    33,063
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You have provided nothing to rebut.

    All you have shown is items that are not illegal or items that Hunter did that you really really feel like Joe is responsible.

    There was a slogan that trump supporters screamed for 4 years about your feelings. Remember it?

    Once you show actual evidence of Joe being involved in something illegal then I will support putting him in the cell beside trump. Until then, Dark Brandon 2024!
     
    Bowerbird likes this.
  23. flyboy56

    flyboy56 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2013
    Messages:
    15,626
    Likes Received:
    5,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    P

    It wouldn’t have been captured and sent to National Archive otherwise. How was Joe able to get government email accounts using several different names and why?
     
    Last edited: Aug 18, 2023
  24. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,356
    Likes Received:
    39,270
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You believe it is legal to sell political influence and facilitate it being done? You have been shown, the payments for the political influence and how he was benefitting from it by Hunters own words. Why do you keep denying it?


    The payments.
    The shell companies.
    The lies about The Big Guys involvement.
    The Big Guys expenses being paid out of the proceeds.

    You've refuted none of the above. Do you agree to stipulate all of those occurred?
     
    Last edited: Aug 19, 2023
  25. The Mello Guy

    The Mello Guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Messages:
    110,078
    Likes Received:
    37,804
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes it’s legal to sell political influence. So long as it’s not a direct quid pro quo. You think billionaire donate to candidates to not be able to influence them? It’s called free speech.
     
    Bowerbird and mdrobster like this.

Share This Page