House Republicans ask Hunter Biden for records on his business dealings

"Sworn Affadavits" are a Complete JOKE (and, Prove Nothing!)

PROVE This Guy (Below) Wrong:
Lieutenant Walter Haut was the public relations officer at the Roswell base in 1947, and was the man who issued the original and subsequent press releases after the crash on the orders of the base commander, Colonel William Blanchard.
Haut died last year, but left a sworn affidavit to be opened only after his death.
Last week, the text was released and asserts that the weather balloon claim was a cover story, and that the real object had been recovered by the military and stored in a hangar. He described seeing not just the craft, but alien bodies.
^"Sworn Affadavits"? Give Me a Break!.LMAO!
Anybody, who actually exists, who would actually consider a "Sworn Affadavit" or the "UNPROVEN Claims" of a Media-Whoring, Attention-Seeking Pathological LIAR (like Tony Bobulinski) as "Conclusive Proof" that something occurred...
...Might as well be viewing Oceanfront Property in Kansas with the Easter Bunny...
(***BTW--I Just Saw a Flying Albino Unicorn outside of my house...
PROVE Me Wrong!
"I KNOW What I Saw!')

 

None of that is real.

 

Where is the DOJ investigation into this.... this meets the reasonable suspicion by a long shot....
Wow.... you took us through the woods with Melissa Carone testimony and then Haut's errr ummmm, testimony? statement? mumbling in his sleep? (without a link of course)...
We have the "reasonable suspicion" emails that shows the big guy getting 10%
We have James Gilliar text acknowledging the big guy...
But not the ""The missed phone call at 1:37 p.m. October 23, 2020, came as Bobulinski was telling two FBI agents that Joe Biden stood to earn a 10% cut of his son Hunter and brother Jim’s lucrative joint venture with Chinese energy firm CEFC.""
https://nypost.com/2022/10/04/hunte...alled-me-during-fbi-interview-ex-biz-partner/

https://bidenlaptopreport.marcopolousa.org/tonybmessages.zip

 

This is a legislative subpoena, which you guys argued that Trump and his goons could ignore any time they wished. He can challenge the subpoena. You guys got on your knees to praise Trump and his cabal when they did so.

 

I didn't argue that.
Tossing crap at the wall hoping it sticks?

Find a better argument.

 

For starters, Biden's former business partner has already spoken to the FBI and it was probably recorded and under oath. I would bet that question and follow-up questions were asked of "who the big guy was." But if he also gives testimony to Congress that deviates from the testimony to the FBI, then he faces a legal challenge, lying to the FBI, which is a crime under Title 18 and would make him a noncredible witness.

So, if he does testify, look at the wording of his statement. He won't make it a fact, he will make it an opinion. And Jim Jordan is not interested in facts. He wants opinions to be made facts which is how GOP investigations usually go down on.

But the point is the "big guy" is pure speculation at this point and oral testimony is not confirmation, just opinion in legalese. You and others are so desperate in wanting to be Joe Biden that you are forgetting to use that cranium of yours in a logical effort to logically determine who that person is the same way the many who specualed who "Deep Throat" was and got it pretty much wrong.

 

The is what you say, but no evidence points to that. Just speculation including the email infamous linking a percentage of the company to the "Big Buy" when attempting to create that partnership. The other problem you have to deal with is whether or not Joe actually knew and there is no record to indicate that they talked about the specifics of that company or its composition.

 

Hey, guy with zero credibility makes completely baseless, uncorroborated and unsupported claims on Tucker Carlson!

 

An NDA does have a force of law in it. It just happened that the Supreme Court has not yet had to deal with a congressional subpeona and the NDA. They had dealt with NDA and lawsuits with the President on a couple of occassions and ruled in favor of the President until those NDAs were nullified by a court of fact, aka district courts.

Again, it is a legal matter. [/QUOTE]
Listen Yuchun de, the supreme court has already ruled that the congressional subpoena has limitations. Your argument that a subpoena has no limitations is not what the Supreme Court has ruled. It is already limited to pretty much anything legislative with the one exception of executive privilege, but not on other matters. For instance, can Congress subpoona a wife to testify before congress on their husband's dealings. In most court of law, that is not allowed even if it is voluntary. So, this is an open question that has to be answered by the courts.

Standing in legal terms means that you have the power to bring it before the courts and let the courts decide. By stating he has no standing, you are now arguing he has no legal recourse which is totally wrong legally,.

Well, look in the mirror and see for yourself. You are so one sided politically that you don't see

It didn't fail, you just refuse to see the legal argument here since you don't know the law.

For someone who can't even get the very basics down in law, see "standing" in your argument, you have not been right so far in this whole endeavor nor are you listening. You are stuck following that carrot and that is all you are good for.

 

But what hurts the most is that is true. Ignoring it won't help you either.

 

Why was the NDA and the art dealer not disclosing the names of the buyers put in place? Why'd they do it in the first place?

It has to do with the FBI and DOJ handling of it, the whistleblowers who came forward. It has to do with intermingling of funds between Hunter and The Big Guy. It has to do with influence peddling. It has to do with possible impeachment. But then you already knew all that.

 

The Utter BS being "claimed" in this thread has grown beyind comical...
The Droning Litany of these absurdist "Big Guy" references reminds me of an Epically-Failled Open Mic Night at a Rundown Dive Bar..
To Wit:
NO Absolute PROOF Exists That Joe Biden was The "Big Guy"!
Period...End of Story...

Anybody, who actually exists, who would actually consider a "Sworn Affadavit" or the "UNPROVEN Claims" of a Media-Whoring, Attention-Seeking Pathological LIAR (like Tony Bobulinski) as "Conclusive Proof" that something occurred...
...Might as well be viewing Oceanfront Property in Kansas with the Easter Bunny...
(***BTW--I Just Saw a Flying Albino Unicorn outside of my house...
PROVE Me Wrong!
"I KNOW What I Saw!')

 

Your biased opinions, poorly thought-out hypotheticals, and broad swipe, ad homs are noted and largely dismissed.

 

Please stop posting if you are just going to go off in a tangent... Please provide a counter argument or quit making foolish responses...

 

Only as a civil matter between the two private parties. It is just a contract between two private parties. This is nonsense. Cite me one court case where a court has said that a NDA between two private parties prevents a subpoena of records.

As I have told you for months.

It is NOT my argument and stop fallaciously claiming it is.

What is the basis of his claim of executive privilege?

Give me your definition please. If you are going to start calling names at least explain what you mean by the name.

The failed just as they are doing here.

I await for you in all your legal brillance to explain how Hunter Biden has a claim of executive privilege over his private records......

 

Well who is it then? Did I miss Hunter stating it was someone else?

BTW

Hunter Biden Business Partner Flips, Now 'Cooperating' With GOP Investigators

Eric Schwerin, a close business associate of Hunter Biden who also dealt with Joe Biden's business and tax affairs, is now working with House GOP investigators looking into Biden family dealings - particularly in Ukraine and China, where the family collected millions of dollars, Just the News reports.

"He is cooperating with us," House Oversight and Accountability Committee Chairman James Comer (R-KY) told the outlet.

"His attorneys and my counsel are communicating on a regular basis. Now, I feel confident that he's going to work with us, and provide us with the information that we have requested," Comer continued. "I think that Schwerwin is going to be a very valuable witness for us in this investigation."

Of note, Schwerin, the former president of Hunter Biden’s now-dissolved investment firm Rosemont Seneca Partners, visited the White House at least 19 times from 2009 to 2015, according to White House visitor log records reviewed by The Epoch Times and first reported by the New York Post...
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/h...rtner-flips-now-cooperating-gop-investigators

 

"a counter argument"?
A "Counter Argument" to a Bigfoot Sighting?
^Why Would I Waste My Time?

 

To avoid accusations of ethics violations and ensure that there does not exist some sort of perceived corruption, obviously outside of baseless accusations.

 

There is no counter argument to your post with this alleged evidence. It is not real. It is pixels on a screen purported to be from someone with no evidence it is that is claiming some baseless conspiracy theory.

 

Do either one of you have anything to add to the conversation in place of the kiddie memes and the lack of rebuttal?

 

Obama promised the same thing. They both lied.

 

What are GOP investigators?

 

you can bet if they could they would do exactly the above

 

House Oversight and Accountability Committee

 

Why would there be a possibility of ethics violations and corruption? How would this NDA prevent it it did not prevent the buyers from sending an email to Hunter telling him they were the one who bought and for how much so you know that deal we talked about where The Big Guy might help out..................