How can homosexuality not be a perversion?

Here is what I find most curious, Why do straight men have a problem with homosexuality? With all of the young gay men coming out the market is flooded with beautiful young women. That is why I have been mostly dating women 20-30 years younger than me for 10 years.

Gay men leave as many more women for me [and a few other guys too I guess]!!!

As for women, about 30% of the ones I meet swing both ways. And that has most certainly been fun!!!

So I'm having a hard time understanding the objections.

 

ROFL. Oh the hazards of speech to text (my bet) or autocorrect!

 

Yeah that's pretty funny you nailed it.

I need to do a better job of proofreading.

 

I'm simply stating a fact. How the viewer feels about the fact is their choice.

 

You misspelled bisexual.

 

No it would simply mean exactly what I said.

 

No he didn't.

 

I'm sorry it's just strange to me that people think they need to point out that humans aren't asexual nobody thinks that they are.

 

That guy will argue endlessly about the meaning of words.

I would consider someone that engages in sexual behavior with but sexes bisexual.

 

Bisexual means you feel sexual attraction to both male and female.

 

You mean like a homosexual that would have sex with the opposite sex too?

 

Sexuality indicated attraction not action. A homosexual can engage in heterosexual activity without being sexually attracted to the other person. A heterosexual can engage in homosexual activity without being sexually attracted to the other person. A bisexual is sexually attracted to both sexes/genders. Sexual attraction occurs even when sex does not.

 

No. I am assuming that you are heterosexual, based on cues in your posting. Feel free to correct me if I am wrong. If a gun was put to your head, or to a love ones head, and you were told to have sex with another man, wouldn't you do that? Would it make you suddenly homosexual or bisexual?

 

Nope, a person can have sex with someone and not be attracted to them at all.

 

Kind of hard if you can't sport some wood!

 

And yet it can be done.

 

I suppose I am being presumptuous, but your statement of fact had a point, right? And that point was that the fact that homosexual intercourse cannot produce a child suggests it is a perversion, right? Help us understand your point.

 

I was trying to understand that myself. I think @FatBack thinks "argue" in this context means "fight". He didn't reply back to me so I'm not 100% sure.

 

And if bullfrogs had wings they would not bump their tiny pelvises upon landing after leaping.

What a truly bizarre world it's becoming.... Boys can be girls and girls can be boys and homosexuals can reproduce....

 

You must have missed my reply because I said it was not an argument I was simply stating a fact

 

I did not suggest anything I only said what I said. If you choose to read more into that then that's your choice.

My initial point was it's not an evolutionarily successful strategy

 

Yep, lesbians can indeed get pregnant.

 

Prove it.

 

I did see that comment. You are still taking the word out of context though.

Your "argument" is two gay men or two lesbians can't procreate. Therefore, my original comment stands. Your argument doesn't work because heterosexual people can and do have sex for reasons other than procreation.

 

If this is true then you really had no point. Or you don't have the courage to state your point because you know it's so weak. But I don't know if that's the case. I'm not saying one way or the other. I'm just saying random things and if you choose to read more into then that that's your choice.

Straight people choose not to have kids all the time. And what about all the precautionary measures people take (pulling out, condoms, birth control)? What are your thoughts on these measures?

So the idea that people would oppose homosexuality because it can't produce kids is laughable. It's just an excuse to cover up animus--which is all that gay hating amounts to at the end of the day.