How come so many health care workers don't get vaccinated?

1. You don't know crap about me.

2. I have a very clear posting history when it comes to vaccines needing to be a personal choice, including my choice.

3. self serving "stories" is the only thing you are spinning. If the vaccines work, then there is no need to think of the poor first responder. If PPE works, there is no need to think of the poor first responder.

4. The person I spoke of to another poster doesn't know where she got COVID nor did most people. They got it. It was that simple.

 

No. He will NEVER read anything that contradicts his religious dogma. That would be HERESY.

 

@Death

You should use the scientific method* when you investigate stuff. If you don't use it, you can unknowingly come to an erroneous conclusion.


*
https://www.google.com/search?q=sci...U1NDRqMWoxNagCALACAA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

 

Show anywhere, in any post where you have used such a method!

 

deleted

 

I used it in this discussion.
http://www.politicalforum.com/index...-apollo-landing.519410/page-9#post-1072078676

Show me where I didn't use it.

 

Have you ever used any scientific method on any of this alternate batshit? Have any of these alternate batshit sites used ANY method even remotely resembling science?

What tiny percentile, how many? how does their relative experience map onto their opinions? What experiments have they personally performed? What causality checks have they performed? What statistics do they base their claims on? Have you verified any of those statistics? etc. etc.

If you fail to do ANY scientific methodology at all, you will arrive at a useless conclusion. Further, if you dismiss EVERY piece of mainstream data because of crazy circular reasoning that "the mainstream media all lie" how is that remotely scientific.

 

@Betamax101

Anyone who takes the time to look at that discussion I linked to in post #31 can see that you are the one who didn't use the scientific method. You had a foregone conclusion and you were torturing the facts to fit that conclusion. Go ahead and rant all you want.

Do you think that Death used the scientific method in posts #23 and #24?
http://www.politicalforum.com/index...s-dont-get-vaccinated.610500/#post-1074329709

 

@Scott

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...urd-hoax-coffin.604367/page-3#post-1074331163

And of course post #32 completely ignored.

 

...will see you getting your ass handed to you.

Air travels in the direction of the falling lid. That's science small children understand. It doesn't squirt out in a tiny corner. That's science small children understand. Dust doesn't pop up like that in terrestrial gravity. It should be easy for you to use your "scientific method" and replicate the results. You won't though because it is only possible in hard vacuum and low gravity. Meanwhile my cited example proves my claim.

Nope. The facts are, explained in the link quoted above.

No need, just handing out a standard ass-kicking will do. You should be well used to them by now.

I actually think it a moronic suggestion that such is needed for posts that use good analogies and solid logic.

You were asked to provide an example of where you use YOUR "scientific method" and chose to spam batshit about Apollo that shows the opposite. Nowhere have you ever used any scientific method, not once!