How fast can skeptics prove that most of Flight 93 buried?

Fangbeer,

How fast can you prove that most of Flight 93 buried?

 

Why do you suppose 'truthers' are afraid to go directly to the source of the evidence? They keep asking questions that have already been answered a multitude of times.

 

suede,

How fast can you prove that United Flight 93 was planted?

 

How fast can I prove it to whom? To you? To someone with an agenda? To someone who refuses to contact witnesses? To someone who refuses to objectively consider evidence?

Why would that period of time be important to anyone? Why would it be important to me?

 

To me and all others seeking the truth. That's our agenda.

I can't force them to contact me back. If you feel you can do better, show me up and embarrass me with this alleged evidence they have that Hannibal says he has too, but won't share.

Um, what evidence?

I figure you might have better things to do with your life than to keeping arguing over this conspiracy theory. Don't you want to put it to rest? Supposedly you guys got "tons" of evidence to prove most of the plane buried. I'm just waiting to see any of it!

 

Then you should probably talk to the people who were on the scene rather then random people on the internet.

They won't contact you back if you never try.

You want an example? How about any of the evidence that you previously arbitrarily classified as "possibly planted?"

I have. You haven't apparently. No skin off my nose.

 

I'm waiting to see how fast you skeptics can prove that most of Flight 93 buried first.

Apparently you can in your very next post, but why you don't is beyond me. Well, I actually have a pretty good idea why you can't, er "won't."

 

The fact is, parts of Flight 93 were buried. It was reported the majority of the plane was buried. There is documentation showing parts of the plane being removed from the ground. In order to go about proving something that has already been proven, one first has to dismiss all accounts of the plane being buried as these are primary sources of evidence. You have done so by claiming they are all lying. Present your evidence that they are all lying. Or run away yet again. Your choice.

 

But you skeptics have said numerous times that you can and even the theories nothing buried have been debunked. Did you skeptics lie?

Well if you don't think I'm doing a good job, show me how it's done. Hannibal supposedly has this evidence. Why don't you ask if he will forward you them? That would kill two birds with one stone; put this conspiracy theory to rest and prove he's not a liar. How's that sound?!

The one partial engine and two small black boxes? How's that prove anywhere close that most of the plane buried? I've never said nothing would get embedded in the ground from a high-speed plane crash into a field. But Flight 93 supposedly did a lot more than that!

 

The evidence awaits you, if you care to look.

Go directly to the source. There are hundreds of people who worked that scene.

 

I'm sorry, where was that proven again?

No that's what Hannibal is doing by saying he has photos and videos from the Shanks volunteers that prove the plane buried, but refusing to let the rest of the world see them. I'm sure he'd forward them to you!

 

Skeptics,

We are on page 7 now. Not looking to good for you guys!

 

Where did I say this?

 

So now you are even denying it was said and reported? Wow.

I ask again. What is your evidence that the people involved are lying. Stop dancing and answer the question. If you can, then you have a case. If you can't, your whole bull(*)(*)(*)(*) agenda is stillborn.

 

I thought in a thread a while back this is what you claimed and that's why I used to repeated it over and over and over again that you claimed this while you never denied saying it and now all of a sudden you're denying you said this. Wow! Why the change of heart?!

You said the Shanksville volunteers had photos and video of the scene. You said they gave you copies. You said you'd seen their evidence. You said they had given copies out to "many" in which I'd counter if that were so, why has no one they allegedly "gave" it to posted it on the net?

So what did you say and what did you not say?

I'm not going to go fish back for what you said, so if you don't correct me what you said, I'm going to keep say what I remember you said, so this is your ONLY CHANCE to clear the air on what you said.

 

Um, no. I'm not asking for proof it's been "said and reported," I'm asking for proof for what's been "said and reported." Anything can be said, anything can be reported. Proof of the claims are a whole nother ball game, one you skeptics are losing badly!

How many do you think had to be "involved"?

Lol, you should talk.

What's my "agenda"?

 

Wrong yet again. MOST if not ALL of what we get is what was said and reported. Pretending that NOW they are all lying just because it fits your bull(*)(*)(*)(*) agenda doesn't fly. You have to show they were lying. You do understand how that works, right?

Just about every person involved. You think the people helping wouldn't notice there was nothing in the hole? At a minimum, every FBI and NTSB agent at the scene would have to be in on it, plus everyone helping with the excavation. I'm sorry, but your hilarious claim that it was only FBI agents doing the recovery is just laughable.

I am not the one going around pretending everyone involved is lying and then running away from defending that claim. Until you can prove everyone involved is lying, you're doing nothing but wasting bandwidth. The evidence they have provided in the form of reports and photographic evidence, plus the fact not one person has EVER stepped forward who was there and claimed there was no plane buried in Shanksville, is good enough for the vast majority (i.e. everyone but you) of people because no evidence exists to refute the credibility of the evidence.

You don't know? Wow. Maybe you can find your agenda through some introspection. I would tell you what your agenda is, but since you're trying to farm insults so you can report people, I will refrain.

 

Since you're unwilling to back your case that United 93 was planted in the thread I created just for it, one has to assume you have no evidence. Or maybe this piece of minutiae you keep attempting to regurgitate is your "evidence", because it appears to be the ONLY thing you're willing to attempt to debate in this forum. If playing games in a circuitous manner is considered debating that is.

The crickets are calling your name truthseeker.

 

I know, but I'm unwilling to share it.

 

Um, go back and read what I said. lol. I know that the plane was buried is what was "said" and "reported." When are you guys going to post some proof that it actually was buried and not just "said" to be buried? Anyone can say anything.

To the rest of the lengthy post that did nothing to prove the "plane buried" claim,

 

Here's what can be said about you guys:

Since you're unwilling to back your case that [most of] United 93 was [buried] in [this] thread I created just for it, one has to assume you have no evidence.

 

So you'll just keep repeating something you're not sure is true, because you can't be bothered to check the facts?

Did I mention how you are the perfect example of a 'truther'?

 

We're up to page 8.

How fast can skeptics prove that most of Flight 93 buried?


So far, it hasn't been very fast.

 

oh come one you mean "they said so" aint good enough?

how ghastly!

disturbing!

 

It doesn't prove or disprove 9/11, so not going to waste my time fishing through an endless sea of threads and posts, especially when you can easily tell me if my comments about what you said are true or not.

Where they true?

Funny, I think you are the perfect example of a 'skeptic'!