"I challenge anyone..." said Syrian Foreign Minister

.
[video=youtube;sXVnyh664l8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXVnyh664l8[/video]

He is challenging anyone to prove that the Syrian Army used chemical weapons on its own people.

He said it is a LIE.

I never believed that Assad or the people of Syrian's forces would use them weapons on their own population.

To me it would be like American soldiers using them on Americans. It could not happen.

How is it that people hate so bad to even accept the news or side with the idea of Syria killing its own population?

The full BBC broadcast of the syrian foreign minister is something that I have not located but I did watch it. The foreign minister and had another comment in a sense inquiring as to why are so many trying to harm and come into syria?

I am wondering the same now. Why?

 

... [video=youtube;GUGrW-SjjbU]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GUGrW-SjjbU&list=PLPC0Udeof3T4NORTjYmPoNCH n2vCByvYG&index=1[/video]

[video=youtube;K8Yhinlr14E]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8Yhinlr14E[/video]

[video=youtube;iKi5a4X0GW4]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iKi5a4X0GW4[/video]

[video=youtube;iFGbXJRba9w]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFGbXJRba9w[/video]

I think it is safe to say that chemical weapons WERE INDEED USED.

 

I could believe, that possibility

But not by the syrian forces.

I would accept foreign weapons being used on syrian soils/population before believing that syrian forces were using them on their own.

But, let's take a funky look at the idea; if syria is willing to use them on their own, how many israelis will perish if syria is attacked? Will they use the same, if not worse of such atrocities? Think about it, if Syria's leader, Assad, is that brutal do you think he would let anything of israel survive, before he is taken out?

I believe he would have already gone hog wild; fed hezbollah the chemical know how and perhaps even funneled munitions into gaza, jordan, lebannon, egypt and just about every rebel in the countries surrounding the bigots of the region.

If the muslim people as a whole, not including the extremist, were as nasty as people have been led to believe, israel would already be gone just for what they have done to the people of gaza (palestinians).



.

 

Really? History is rife with examples of Dictators murdering millions of their own citizens. What makes Assad any different than his father for instance? Is it merely because of the use of nerve agents in lieu of HE artillery?

He couldn't possibly destroy Israel. He is militarily incapable of such especially while fighting a civil war.
If he used WMD to attack Israel, he is merely insuring his complete and total destruction.

That is a zero sum strategy.
Giving a third party non state actor (hezbollah) chemical weapons? - that is a war crime.

Thinking that Syria can't be guilty because they haven't yet armed all the "rebels" in surrounding arab countries is yet another logical fallacy. You seem to like that approach.

Which of course is why the people of gaza have been treated so well by the muslim people as a whole over the past 70 years or so.

 

Lets not forget how this civil war started, because Assad gunned down his own people during protests.

 

For Pavlovized brain dead "Americans" there is only the dictate of the TV war crazies. Reality is irrelevant to such people.

 

No he did not. A close friend was there is just did not happen.

 

He most certainly did. This is established fact.

 

Oh no it isn't. You were shown bullet holes in walls ....................... it simply didn't happen.

 

Is that what Syria tells you? lol

 

That is what an English girl friend who was working there, in Damascus, told me.

 

LOL OK. I think I will believe the reports stating otherwise.

 

The talk of many Talmudized "Americans" is that Syria is guilty simply because they are accused.

Such "Americans" have rejected the Prophet Moses who told us to have 2-3 faithful witnesses to move against anyone. Since such "Americans" hate Moses, they also hate the God of America, "nature's God", Jesus Christ.

Never mind that the USA has used chemical weapons in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Yugoslavia etc. Never mind that the USA supported the use of chemical weapons supposedly by Saddam Hussein.
Never mind that the USA lied about the Kennedy assassinations, Martin Luther King assassination, Vietnam, Panama, Bosnia, Kosovo, 9/11, Waco, Ruby Ridge, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan and many other events.

They claimed to be saving the people of Iraq, and killed millions of them in the process of "saving them";
They killed a million Philippinos to bring them democracy;
They maimed, slaughtered and impoverished the people Libya;
They burned to death thousands of poor Black people in Panama for democracy;
Here is the military mandate of the USA since Lincoln:
"We are not fighting against enemy armies, but against an enemy people, both young and old, rich and poor, and they must feel the iron hand of war in the same way as organized armies."
Here it is in action, the deliberate deaths of 500,000+ children fully approved by the United States Secretary of State and the rest of the various US regimes:
[video=youtube;x4PgpbQfxgo]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x4PgpbQfxgo[/video]

Here is the kind of liar backstabbing guy the USA loves as a prince of democracy:

 

Who are the reports from? You know these people? No you don't, even though you allow them in your home every day, you don't know them. They are Brainwashers.

That girl I have known since she was a tot ..................

 

You know, the next time someone discusses how the Holocaust didn't happen along with links, I think I'll ask if those reports are from the Brainwashers. Thanks!

In the meantime, I think Human Rights Watch might have a bit more credibility here.

This has been verified numerous times.

Maybe she's been brainwashed?

 

The USA's Talmu-Islamic terrorists attacked the town near Aleppo that they had gassed in March.
They attacked inorder to eliminate any evidence and kill all the witnesses.

The USA has no witnesses faithful to the truth, not even one regarding the gas attacks.
But, the USA has the anti-Christ Talmudic Noahide Laws that allow them to condemn anyone based on the testimony of 1 witness not bound by the truth.
Plus, the USA has lots of blood on its hands for its chemical weapon usage.

For the nice pseudo American Wolfe regarding the Holocaust:
How come there were Ashkenazi "Jews" holding high ranking positions in the Nazi Party and Nazi Government?
Nazi Germany had a special court,
"Intended to enable prominent party members to rid themselves of the stigma of Jewish ancestry,"
Law of April 12, 1938 (Reichsgestzblatt I, 386)
Encyclopedia Britanica 1953, Page 219C Vol. 10

 

Riiiiiight. What ARE these "Noahide LawS" Please link to them.

Oh, and do be aware that the definition of a preamble is

 

USA Weapons of Mass Deception
The reason that the USA doesn't need proof, evidence or witnesses is because the USA adopted the Talmudic Noahide Laws that only require 1 witness to convict any "goyim" of anything.

So, the USA has got some Imam or Rabbi saying that Syria must be destroyed, and that is all the US regime needed to start the war on Syria and to expand it.

Also, according to the Noahide Laws, Christians are worthy of torture and death by decapitation.
The US backed terrrorists are decapitating Christians in Syria in accordance with US policy.

Noahide Laws Examined
http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/america_1.html

Madeleine Albright's admission to killing 500,000+ kids for USA lies is a conviction of the USA, as a nation that has no moral foundation to accuse other nations of anything.
[video=youtube;x4PgpbQfxgo]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x4PgpbQfxgo[/video]

 

Riiiiight.

[video=youtube;wcinzmfZeCc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcinzmfZeCc[/video]

The Noahide mention occurs in the preamble of the law, not the actual law itself which starts with the phrase "Be it Resolved" the preamble, as defined in a previous post, is NOT the actual law.

Now find a law passed by Congress in which the Noahide laws are made the law of the land in the actual LAW and NOT the preamble.

Take your time, we'll be waiting for a VERY long time for you to find this example.

 

modern times

People evolve individually and the majority like assad.

How many like Obama?

You see them numbers but dont look around.

if the west strikes, he's gone anyway.

That's why samson option.

So is the quest for the mount. An inheritance?????

so is going against UN.

Problem is, you label a man (assad) as capable to destroy, his own. Basically a madman capacity, but then forget to think, like a madman.

If the guy is capable to kill his own, then why would he not destroy what the whole region, hates?

They cant treat them with much because everyone must ashkanazi, to even get into the concentration camp (gaza)

 

Noahide Law was applied to the people at Waco, Ruby Ridge, upon the nations of Iraqi and Afghanistan, Libya, Yugoslavia and now Syria. It is also being quietly applied to individuals in America.
It is also applied in the "PATRIOT ACT" that enables the system to arrest & execute anyone they want.
It is being applied by the USA in buying thousands of guiotines as the Noahide laws require decapitation for "criminal" goyim.
Concentration camps, huge numbers of plastic coffins and a billion rounds of dum dum ammo has been established for use on the American People pursuant to the Noahide Laws.

 

Modern Times? Not aware of much history of the last half of the 20th century I guess.

And what opinion poll are you using to make the claim that the majority support Assad? Or maybe it was the last election?

completely irrelevant.

Yep I see them numbers. Attacking Israel is suicide.

If the west strikes, I severely doubt it will be decisive, but never can tell, they might get lucky.

the sampson option is a MAD strategy for the survival of an entire nation. Its not about saving a regime. Interesting that you would attempt to equate the two situations.

Irrelevant.

BFD. for someone who whinges about international law and zionists, you don't seem to have a problem with arabs committing war crimes if it will weaken israel. Situational ethics often can bite a person in the ass.

Of course Assad is capable of destroying his own. Hes been engaged in such activity for the past two years. Again, history is rife with madmen who have destroyed huge chunks of their own land and people in the vain attempt at retaining power.

As to why not attempt to hurt Israel on his way down - it is entirely possible I suppose. I realize that Assad using wmd in an attempted at genocide Israelis (it'll kill jews and arabs) is an anti-zionist wet dream, but one helluva a lot more arabs/muslims will die in such a vain attempt.

Not much of a student of the history of the arab brethren's treatment of palestinian arabs and vice versa, I see.

(ashke-nazi? your school yard wit lives up to my lowest expectation)

 

That is what i measure with. Concentration camp Gaza, is bonafide oppression of an uprooted people. Refugees by the forced ethnic cleansing of palestine by israeli bigots.

The majority of the middle east hates them for it.

see post title

sure it is.
You were asking who says otherwise. I aint witnessed a single syrian, state a bad word against assad. i am watching you thou

so is using chems on own population.

And if he was a tyrant and wanted all them muslims to love him, which group of bigots would he target over his own?

Have you ever noted that suicide bombers exist on the nutty side of human capabilities?

So you are aware that it may not be a small war? i hate it myself.

and Assad loosing his yahoos, is what?

If the west just clipped him, and if he is actually MAD...... does samson make sense on both sides?

both are just 'regimes'. The problem you are having is self reflection. You dont consider that you could be wrong.

you're just turning your head

what?

Why do you believe that syria is about weakening or strengthening israel?

i think it must be because iran will get involved and then israel can try to take on iran. My opinion personally

bummer

I've done my part already; mankind is awakening.

the rebels aint syrian.... ah dahhhhhhh.

how about the rebels are using chemical weapons on a population that dont matter to them.......

i agree, but there were no soldiers of the rebels, in the dead, that i saw.

that's why i crack up on the self destruction path, for israel

Im over here and not a dam thing i can do about it, except point out what is real

what attempt? Outside forces are using chem weapons, within his country and claiming it is him.

Idiots are labeling someone MAD but do not consider how MAD people will get just for the maddness of the lie.


if you know anyone in israel, and think they are worth a dam, get them out quick

 

You obviously have no idea what a concentration camp is all about. Are you aware of how many of the gazans are actually displaced? can a person who is born in gaza whose grandparents lived in hiafa be displaced?

I disagree. I think that the majority of the middle east hates them because they exist. A jewish state amidst the muslim ummah is considered an abberation. some arabs will tolerate jews living amongst them as dhimmis who know their place, but a bunch of them living amongst them who are the bullies on the block is untenable.

In other words you have no evidence for your claim.

so you are now claiming that Assad is on the nutty side?

No I do not believe it is going to be a bigger war, unless Assad tries to take out Israel with wmd.

MAD - Mutually Assured Destruction. It appears you really don't know what this doctrine is all about.

Now that is amusing. Israel is a nation. syria is a nation. The current Israeli government is a regime. Assad's government is a regime.

Given my life, I completely understand that I can be mistaken, repeatedly and with some regularity.

No, just not interested in engaging in irrelevancy. You regularly use tangential comments of no relevance to the topic at hand.

do you really have that much trouble understanding english or are you once again attempting to engage in a witty reply?

I don't see Iran getting involved at all.

Funny, despite your arrogant presumption in claiming to be mankind's alarm clock, situational ethics have preceeded your existence by about 250,000 years or so.

Righto, all those "rebels" aren't syrian. What a stupid claim.

Oh? what kind of uniforms do the rebel soldiers wear?

You are in Syria? As to pointing out what is real = when are you going to start?

another example of either deliberately misunderstanding what I said, or you really do have problems with english.

convoluted nonsense based on your surprising ignorance of the MAD doctrine.

inane.

 

sure i do and Gaza is unacceptable to mankind

...them who are the bullies on the block is untenable.

it's almost 70yrs old. And fenced in, still.

Have you ever asked an israeli how they could have a right to palestine, if their grand parents never were born there?

What gave irgum the right to terrorize palestinians? What give israel the right to the golan heights? (syrian land)

Not so. It is because of the oppression that israel has imposed for the last 70yrs.

that's crap. There are more christians in iran and in syria than in israel, because of the same reasons israelis do not like muslims. The you cross your own claim with some arabs will tolerate jews living amongst them as dhimmis who know their place, but a bunch of them living amongst them who are the bullies on the block is untenable.

I agree......... bigots aint going to EVER be king of the hill.

Muslims aint the tyrants of the region, is has been israeli zionist pukes, since the term terrorism began in the region

.