"I Don't Have A Problem With Gay People..."

Glad I could be of service. Thanks for having the patience to hear me out.

 

My integrity is intact. The context of the statement you selectively quoted was in response to another poster's HYPOTHETICAL proposal of civil unions for same-sex couples while maintaining legal marriage of opposite-sex couples:

...as in providing identical benefits & responsibilities to the persons civil united vs. those who are married. There was nothing in there about the benefits of same-sex marriage to society, which was the bulk of your refutation of your own strawman. The other poster stipulated government providing identical treatment of civil unions as compared to marriage in everything but name.

There is no basis for your complaint. If you persist with haranguing me this way, I will consider it trolling and ignore you permanently. Fair warning.

 

Yeah, thats what I was referring to. No need to point out what is obvious to all.

 

Ignored, permanently. I'm simply not going to indulge any more of your trolling.

 

I wouldn't let him off the hook (completely). I put him on ignore for various periods of time... and always seek to throw a cog into his nonsense every so often... so that people lurking, won't get the idea that sane people actually buy that BS he keeps propagating.

 

Promises, promises.

 

Whay will you two talk about, without your favorite topic, ME!

 

I recently cleared my ignore list, and resolved that the only people I'll put back on ignore are those who are just too loopy to be bothered with, parody posters, people who namecall, propagandists who use the "gay mafia" or similar BS terms, and those who show a pattern of dishonesty, repetition, baiting, trolling etc.

I've also resolved that anyone who gets placed on ignore now isn't getting a reprieve. I'm not reading their posts and won't respond to them, period. Otherwise it just encourages the worst elements to settle in and make the forums their home.

 

marriage STILL isn't a right....

 

As defined in numerous supreme court cases, it is indeed a right.

 

I know what you mean, I have lots of friend who are gay, did I mention blacks or yes and jews to. What a crock. We are all predjudiced (sp) we just don't want to admit it. I think that you can be what you want as long as you are not demonstrating in my front yard. I don't push my beliefs in someone elses face so please just stay out of mine. If you don't like what Chick-fil-A believes boycott it and don't eat there. I am absolutely positive that they don't care. The don't open on Sunday either so there.

 

I think the big disconnect here is that somebody's opinion should not limit the civil rights of an entire group of people. The "gay marriage issue" is clearly a religious one and should be left out of politics. Putting "religious morality" aside, why should you care if a loving couple (albeit, different than you) are getting married? Limiting them sends a message to society and the children in our society that there is something wrong with them. Which is very harmful.

 

Has nothing to do with religion

Its biology

Only a man makes a woman the mother of his children. Has absolutely nothing to do with religion.

 

mothers or fathers are completely irrelevant. the ability to procreate is not a requirement of marriage. which is why the inability to procreate, can not be used as a reason to deny same sex couples the right to marry.

 

I said Only a man makes a woman the mother of his children. NOT that a man is required to make a woman the mother of his children.

 

which is what makes your point, idiotic, and utterly irrelevant.

 

Irrelevant if you live in the 6 states with gay marriage. Controlling in the other 44. AND, even in the 6 states with gay marriage, only women become mothers who give birth and only men father those children. Only men are presumed to be the fathers of their wifes children because women cant father children and men dont give birth.

 

nope. irrelevant in all 50 states. your presumption of paternity argument has been refuted long ago.

 

Click the heels of your pretty red ruby slippers 3 times while repeating there is no place like home, and maybe it will come true.

 

lol, I don't need to, it remains irrelevant in all 50 states, and your presumption of paternity argument remains long refuted.

 

Its not an argument, it is a fact. ONLY men are presumed to be the father of any child his wife bears. Because only women give birth and only men father children.

 

nope. it's an argument, and it's been refuted.

completely irrelevant to who can marry.

 

In the 6 states with gay marriage. In the other 44 it is controlling.

 

nope. it's irrelevant in all 50 states.