"I don't want Syria to become another Iraq"

Why should one Israeli die for their criminality to refusel to accept a UN member? and no, a cease fire is not peace.

 

The criminality here is Israel's-or do you now choose to ignore the United States, the United Nations and everyone else (no, not just Arabs), who have condemned Israel for its illegal activities?

 

Im not saying Israel was not condemned, Im saying the first offense that started this mess was made by Arab Palestinians, they were not condemned because they never declared a state like they could/should in 1948, since then Israel fought for its existance and really shouldnt have, we shouldnt have suffred one death, one injury and not one cent in def budget over the minimal border def.

 

Well, if you were arbitrarily thrown out of your home by foreign settlers, and off the land you had worked for centuries, wouldn't you be a bit pissed-off?
I don't care who did what first, or where, frankly. The fact remains that Jews were given more than enough land to settle but it wasn't enough, apparently, and now they are in the process of appropriating more and more land from the Palestinians who, quite correctly, are doing their best to stop Israel from eventually stealing the lot, which is the Zionist imperative. I imagine, if you were in Palestine's position, that you would do the same.

 

Some other folks " don't want Syria to become another Iraq". They want it to be much worse than Iraq.

 

No need to accuse you if you really are that way.

 

Well, he did stand by when we invaded Iraq which was also in his sphere of influence. Because he stood by at that time, the neocons are probably depending on his 'weakness' again. Lord knows, we can't have a head-of-state appearing weak.

 

Hate to tell you this, but Syria is already another Iraq. Another Lebanon.

Egypt is roaring down the same road.

 

They are a democratic country with a Paliament that has Arab muslims in it. In fact, Arab muslims have more of a voice in Israel than in pretty much any other country in the Middle East. Jews haters just think it's OK for muslims to shoot 20,000 missiles and mortars into the middle of Israel and kill Jews on a regular basis; but then are offended when the Jews go to where the missiles are coming from and try and take out the terrorists. If muslims don't want to get hurt they shouldn't start these problems. Jew haters wouldn't be defending Mexico if Mexico shot 20,000 missiles into Texas; now would they?

 

When Iran is attacked, they will have wrecked 6 nations, creating years and years of new Pentagon spending, new "threats" for the never ending war machine, which was the plan all along.

 

you nailed it.hey did you get my pm?

 

too bad half the posters at this forum will never read this post.the truth hurts them to face it that both parties are corrupt and one in the same. all these facts you posted is WHY I think the establishment will make sure HELLERY is the new president in 2016.

- - - Updated - - -

damn you got the best posts on this thread and there have been a lot of great ones from people against this fake and phony war.many people here dont get it but our government started world war 3 on sept 11th.

 

AGAIN your posts are the most educated well thought out on this whole thread.anybody who says you are clueless is an idiot.they are the cluless ones.

- - - Updated - - -

your making way too much sense there for him.hee hee.

 

you nailed it again.Obama,and the majority of congress backed and supported by the zionists jews are clapping up a storm for the us to invade another country again and murder more innocent women and children.

 

You must be either a second membership.....or a confused and rather pathetic individual.

 

except Im not.I have friends that are jewish and yet I get called anti semitic for telling the TRUTH that zionist jews control congress. might as well call Ed Asner who is jewish,anti semitic as well while your at it since he condemns Isreal and the united states for staging 9/11 rightly so.yep thats someone really anti semitic there.

 

I am asking you that if you knew an attack was imminent or even just likely why would you keep your family next to a potential target?

 

nice rebuttals to the facts,thanks for proving you are afraid of the truth and wont look at the evidence.the truth hurts so you stoop to childish insults.

 

Actually no more so than Iraq at the time. The WMD that UNSCOM cataloged and was in process of destroying before they were kicked out were never all accounted for. The materials needed to produce more that were also cataloged and were in the process of being brought under monitor were never fully accounted for. And we found hidden cache's of those highly toxic organophosphates Saddam had hidden from inspections. And attack when them as they were could have produced the same deaths we are seeing in Syria. Assad could be moving weapons stocks around as Saddam was doing even up to the last minute avoiding the last inspection attempts. What Obama has not learned from Clinton is that such surgical strikes do nothing. Even if Assad had them all in one building and we hit that building, he could rearm rather quickly as Saddam could have and would have.

They are quite easily moved and hidden.

 

America is not a Democracy. We are a Federal Republican.

 

How do you know what is a potential target? What if your home is near an army base or airport? Why should I leave just so Obama the POS garbage that he is, should get personal satisfaction in seeing Syria burn?

Where are people supposed to go from their homes? That IS THEIR HOME. Not yours. Not Obamas. Not the home of Americans. But Syrians HOME. You have no right to attack a foreign country and you cannot make rule that decide where one should live.

How would you like if Russia gave you that ultimatum? "Get out or we will bomb you, dont blame us if you die"

 

In which case, wasn't it the wrong move to upstage the Assad Government and support the rebels in the first place? Assad might not be perfect, he might've even used the Chemcial Weapons, but he's a "rational player" to quote Madam Clinton.

We know damn well that Al-Qaeda terrorists are NOT rational players. Is there a moderate secular political force in Syria at the moment? Anything that's not Pro-Muslim Brotherhood/terrorists? We can support them, make a deal with Assad on a safe passage outside of Damascus, problem solved.

 

Obtuseness noted.

 

You got it all wrong. Democracy does not mean decisions are made by referendums, public opinion polls or rule of the mob (which is how people in the Arab world understand democracy). Democracy means decisions are made by elected representatives within the prerogative of their constitutional/legal responsibilities. In other words in Democracies decisions are made by presidents, senators, congressmen, members of parliaments, prime ministers etc.

 

We didn't support them and they have never had our support.

When they us chemical weapons on their own people they are no longer rational. Hillary has shown her utter incompetence in this whole matter as with the rest of her foreign policy matters.

Yes Syria itself is secular. But do to Obama's fecklessness and ideas that all he has to do is demand something and people will do it those moderate forces have had to look to radical groups for support and that comes with a price.