So let's debate this genericBob. There was a FOCUSED load/impact force generated. That load/impact force would be applied to the plane and the immediate area of the perimeter columns around where the nose first impacted the perimeter columns. So which was going to fail first? The perimeter columns and components in that area or the plane? And to further prove you are wrong, here is a video of a jet smashing into a concrete wall. Tell us why the tail does not slow down or break away from the stress of the nose impacting the concrete wall like you think it should. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZjhxuhTmGk It just "melts" into the concrete wall.
WELL , I'm still AMAZED there's anyone left on the Planet that's dumb enough to still believe the B. S. 9/11 Official Story ! Still ROFLMFAO!
Wow, two fallacies in one sentence. Try and prove your story instead of just lobbing ad hominems, because that is merely the refuge of the idiot.
He laughs hysterically. So far no one has any valid data proving your conspiracy, just opinion based on a fallacy.
The dumb ones believe everything else. You conspiracy loons are in the extreme fringe minority and growing weaker every day. The evidence overwhelmingly crushes you and none supports you. The so called official account 9 not really official ) is proven every claim you have made to the contrary has been proven wrong. No evidence whatsoever of controlled demo. The towers to include 7 fell at normal ( less than free fall ) speed. The planes were real no missiles were used and no stand down order. All facts you have miserably failed to refute. Even the various websites such as A&E for 911 truth have been proven fraudulent and not just in their claims. They are all open to anyone who wishes to join and in fact few if any of their members are experts in the field which corresponds to the website title. In other words few if any real architects or engineers join architects and engineers for 911 truth. Most members of that site are anyone from any and all backgrounds who wish to join. Same with pilots for 911 truth, teachers for 911 truth, journalists for 911 truth etc. None of these sites screen or verify occupations or background of their members. Meaning their claims of expertise is BS.
I'm a new poster here, and just realized your post is almost a year old, but I agree completely with your observation. One must be completely unaware of the details and facts to still believe the official version of events. To still believe that tale, one must be most incurious.
It may look like that to the lay person, but when one really looks into the claims of 9/11 truth, they lack substance. The claims sound persuasive initially, but that is merely superficial.
If that were true, why does the government hide so much related to the story? Why were surviving family member forced into class settlements? That is, why were they not allowed their day in court along with all the normal discovery processes? If there is nothing to hide about the story, if it is so strong and viable, why is so much being hidden? - - - Updated - - - Very much the opposite, good sir.
No evidence refutes it - - - Updated - - - They do not hide much at all and no one was FORCED into a settlement.
The issue was that you claimed some were forced into settlement they never were and lawsuits are meaningless
And that is true. Any lawsuit by surviving family members was forced into the class action, and the advantage to that is NO DISCOVERY.