I'm Amazed !

Discussion in '9/11' started by Don Townsend, Aug 31, 2014.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Don Townsend

    Don Townsend New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,357
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It's been awhile seen I looked at the 9/11 discussions on this forum frankly because I assumed they had to be several years old.
    The fact that it's still being debated astonishes me. Surely, I felt the vast amount of evidence that has been found had to have put a halt to all doubt and speculation that 9/11 was totally an inside job false flag operation and according to over 2200 Architects and Engineers (experts in their field) that the buildings were undoubtedly brought down by controlled demolition. Sure there may be questions who was responsible and what their motives were.But, surely the official story has been debunked as much as the theory of the sun revolving around the earth or that the earth is flat. Yeah , I know 25% of Americans still believe the sun revolves around the earth, but I'm talking about people with I.Q.'s above 50 know it was Inside job false flag operation !
     
  2. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Link to the papers published by these 2200 showing their work and conclusions. You don't have to link to all 2200+ papers. Five will be more than sufficient.
     
  3. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Here is just a bit of food for thought - http://911speakout.org/
    also, just another bit of INFORMATION about this operation, it was supposed to have been well planned by a bunch of Arabs who hated our freedoms, but the well planned part doesn't ring true. Fact is that unless the radicals had some VERY good espionage, they knew NOTHING of the vulnerability of the Pentagon wall, so therefore, why not attack from the top, or fly the airliner in the front door of the Pentagon, the hit as alleged to have happened makes no sense, unless the goal was to hit the accounting dept. also, how did the hijackers know that their airliners would penetrate the WTC wall(s), what if the aircraft bounced off?
    the whole thing from a planning perspective is WRONG!
    clearly what we see here is a False Flag operation.
     
  4. Karma Mechanic

    Karma Mechanic Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2012
    Messages:
    8,054
    Likes Received:
    83
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Can you show this proof you have?
     
  5. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    For anybody who stayed awake for SCIENCE 101 class
    the fact that the towers "collapsed" straight down & at the rate that they did & WTC7 descending for 2.25 sec at free fall acceleration.... give me a break, the fact that anybody asks for "proof" when the PROOF is right in front of you..... oh well

    whatever .......
     
  6. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Please don't try to derail this thread also, bob. Let's stick to the topic at hand, please.

    Still waiting for the links to any five papers published by any of the 2200 showing their work and conclusions.
    They are architects and engineers, right? Showing their work is WHAT THEY DO.

    Links, please.
     
  7. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Please note both Johnathan Cole & David Chandler are members of AE911truth and also their page contains valid data to base 9/11=inside job claims upon.
    don't give me this "derail the thread" stuff! Do you not accept David Chandler & Johnathan Cole as valid sources for INFORMATION?
     
  8. Don Townsend

    Don Townsend New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,357
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Bob they're well aware of the data and facts. It's one of tactics out of the disinformation agent handbook, to wear down the Conspiracy Analyst by asking for the same thing over and over and when you do provide it they just ignore it. it's not necessary to bury the truth only to delay it until no one cares anymore-- Bonaparte
     
  9. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Please link to their published papers that show their work on this subject and the conclusions they reached via their work.
    Add to that three more of the 2200 who have published. I'm just asking for five out of twenty-two hundred. Why is this so very difficult?

    Thanks.
     
  10. Don Townsend

    Don Townsend New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,357
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Could you please provide all evidence, data, and experimental data and conclusions The 9/11 Commission and NIST based their final reports on .I would be particularly interested in the test NIST did for evidence of HIGH EXPLOSIVES. Oh , wait a minute they didn't perform any did they !
     
  11. NightSwimmer

    NightSwimmer New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2013
    Messages:
    2,548
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    0

    Duh?

    The Earth is flat. It is merely the curvature of space-time that causes our planet to appear spherical to outside observers.
     
  12. Don Townsend

    Don Townsend New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,357
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Thanks, I needed a good laugh !
     
  13. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    As soon as you provide the links to the papers I requested, I would be happy too.

    Still waiting ... any five will do.
     
  14. Don Townsend

    Don Townsend New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,357
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You show the test Nist did for High Explosives and Ill show you ours . You first Mr. Hannibal,after all you have the Government and their resources supporting your position . It should be real easy just copy and paste the information from the official reports.
     
  15. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I asked you first, Don. You made a very specific claim in your post and I'd like to see some evidence to back you your claim. You have 2200 architects and engineers and all I want is five measly links to papers they wrote supporting what you claim they do.

    It's your topic, why are you trying to change it? Links, please.
     
  16. Don Townsend

    Don Townsend New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,357
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You're well aware of the data, evidence ,and documentaries of Richard Gage on behalf of the A & E's .and i'm well aware of your tactics. After completing your requests and running in circles, you'll simply dismiss the information. Well I'm turning the tables on you ; Our proof is everywhere on the Internet ,but I can't seem to find any actual data on any experiments or tests performed by the 9/11 Commission or NIST . Nist supposedly used computer simulation models to prove their conspiracy theory that office fires caused the collapse of all three buildings, but for some reason they won't release them. Our data is available yours isn't. So you can't reciprocate to fulfill your pledge Really,MOD EDIT>>>RULE 2/PERSONAL ATTACK<<<
     
  17. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Come on, Don: this thread is not about me. Stop trying to make it personal.

    Can you kindly link just five papers from any of the 2200 architects and engineers? Just five. Let the readers decide for themselves from the evidence you present.
     
  18. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,413
    Likes Received:
    889
    Trophy Points:
    113
  19. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Publishing your work is how engineers and architects get things done or changed. Surely out of 2200 at least five of them have laid out their theory on paper, with math and physics to back it up.

    Would it be easier if I asked for only three?
     
  20. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    We're not asking anything unreasonable....And as of yet NO ONE from the truthers has shown anything worth noting.
     
  21. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    and the INFORMATION at http://911speakout.org/
    doesn't answer any of your questions? ...... what?
     
  22. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Opinion STILL isn't proof.
     
  23. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Still says nothing about your lack of proof
     
  24. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    There is a huge problem here, its like a room with a huge stinking elephant taking up space in the room, and nobody wants to address the fact that there is an elephant in the room. The problem here is that 9/11/2001 is a very poorly documented disaster and also the bits that are documented, show very clearly that the mainstream media is supporting FRAUD in that there were no 19 suicidal hijackers, no airliners used as weapons..... total farce!

    Danger Will Robinson.... DANGER!
    Dr Smith is actually a football coach......
    eeew!
     
  25. Don Townsend

    Don Townsend New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,357
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The ramifications of this Criminal Conspiracy to Destroy these building to further someones hidden agenda will affect future events and actions forever. First you have the outright murder of thousands of innocent people, 10's of thousands of military lives and hundred's of thousands of civilian
    lives lost in Wars using this as an excuse not to mention the trillions of dollars it cost the taxpayers in this country.Then you have the loss of security and freedom because they used this Criminal Conspiracy to pass the PATRIOT ACT which gives the Government the authority to arrest and rendition
    you without due process just by calling you a TERRORIST. There is no limits to what this Criminal event perpetrated by our own Government will be used as excuse for in the future. people should be rioting in the streets demanding an investigation into who was actually responsible for this Crime,
    but instead the majority will just set back and say leave me alone and let me watch my America Idol I haven't got time for that nonsense and that's what the Criminals who perpetrated this Crime want ! WHAT A COUNTRY !
     

Share This Page