I'm calling it right now...

I don't watch tv anymore, so I don't know how many actual tv ads he has. I have seen plenty of ads on youtube though.

Official Ads:

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UUNIeOB0whI&feature=relmfu"]Ron Paul Conviction Ad - YouTube[/ame]

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pChzOaIeyxY"]Ron Paul - "The one who can beat Obama" - YouTube[/ame]

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VlYG6vh2T-M&feature=player_embedded"]RevolutionPAC :60 TV ad "Plastic Men" - YouTube[/ame]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?annota...6&v=CtDBp1OrCwI&feature=iv&src_vid=kUHlIPJTMI

Unofficial fan made ads:

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Muf23Rc7HV8&list=FLcI01AB4KzumsuILLboebAw&index=3"]The Awakening of a Generation: Ron Paul 2012 - YouTube[/ame]

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohKz9OeiI0g&list=FLcI01AB4KzumsuILLboebAw&index=13"]Ron Paul: The Only One We Can Trust - YouTube[/ame]

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhyaiOZhpSg&feature=related"]Ron Paul 2012 "The High Tide" HD - YouTube[/ame]

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2rMnov4Ae8&list=FLcI01AB4KzumsuILLboebAw&index=19"]"Banned" Commercial: Ron Paul 2012 (Unofficial) - YouTube[/ame]

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ydck0fSqspA&list=FLcI01AB4KzumsuILLboebAw&index=27"]RON PAUL 2012 TRUST - YouTube[/ame]

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gg3EptrKOms&list=FLcI01AB4KzumsuILLboebAw&index=42"]RON PAUL is EXPLODING (2012 Trust Today) - YouTube[/ame]

I bet there are plenty more but those are the ones I know of right now. A lot of the fan made ones are pretty inspirational in my opinion.

 

The Tea Party of today, I wonder how they came up with the idea?
It is not theirs, yet they completely dismiss Ron Paul as a nut, while the usual suspects profit from what he has been saying all along.
Wake up people, listen....

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GweT2r3BGi8"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GweT2r3BGi8[/ame]

 

Andrew Jackson sent the eastern tribes on the Trail of Tears. He outright told the US Supreme Court that he didn't care what they said ("Mr. Justice Marshall has made his order; now let him enforce it!"). Checks and Balances? Tricameral? Not for Jackson.

He was a violent man who did in fact ENJOY killing Indians. I may be mistaken, but (unless James Polk or Zachary Taylor) he was the only president this century (I think Washington may have killed a few during his military career) who actually did the slaying with his own hands.

Care about America? Long's you were white, maybe. Andrew Jackson was the most murderous president in our history. Oh, George W. Bush may have the blood of more human beings on his hands, but he was a soulless neocon tool. Jackson was the only one who ever got off on the bloodiness.

Bush would never have actually pulled a trigger in Iraq. Jackson would be over there regularly, directing the war hands-on. He would make sure that all the oil under Iraqi soil was AMERICA'S, no matter who he had to have killed.

You're right. There would be a quantum increase in both judicial and non-judicial use of the death penalty. And I predict that most of you alleged conservatives would be on the side of this socialist revolutionary in fighting him and his thralls.

Andrew Jackson: the worst president in American History, as I have maintained for decades.

WPH from MS

 

Andrew Jackson was a wide swinging pendulum for sure. I suppose you are one of those who thinks all the original presidents were monsters for historical practices which were considered moral in their time, slavery and such. There is not an American without blood on their hands as far as natives are concerned, as there is not an American who didn't benefit from manifest destiny. Now, considering this day and age, there are no greater monsters as far as Americans are concerned than bankers. We need a president who has the balls to stand up to them, not pretend they are while simply arranging low level banks to be bought out by larger ones for pennies on the dollar. Andrew Jackson, as with the majority of our forefathers, was no globalist, as I imagine you are. America would have never got into the Spanish-American war with presidents such as him in power to this day, let alone any war since. I have no doubt he would have marched us to take over Mexico, but quite frankly, that is exactly what needs to happen, though the neutered types who represent both parties would never acknowledge it for PC reasons and the fact Mexico is already on the global dole as far as the elite are concerned.

 

I intend to respond to this post in more detail tonight, or tomorrow morning, but I gotta get ready and go off to my bowling league. I promise I will be back with you, sir.

WPH from MS

 

What the hell office is Andrew Jackson running for in 2012???????????????

 

Would McCain be any better? The way I see it, because Obama got elected, people are shifting towards a less government ideology. If McCain got elected, he would have a "conservative" tag, even though he's not conservative at all, and people would be looking towards the Democrats for more government interventionism now. Your immaturity is shown by supporting the party, and not the candidate. Our problems in this country are SO MUCH beyond Republican vs. Democrat... this is liberty vs. tyranny.

 

McCain was not my first choice, but with him elected, we would not have Obamacare, Stimulus BS, and world leaders would have more respect for our President.

 

Please. The agenda of today was written weeks ago, those elected are just front men. "Obamacare" would have been presented by McCain, but as a free market solution since private health insurance companies are the arbitrators. It would have been the democrats who "vowed to destroy it" over their "wanting of a single payer system!".

 

So John McCain, who sacrificed years of his young manhood in prison, and suffered crippling injuries in the Military service of this nation would have been just as bad as the incompetent pig, odrama???????

Your statement is as disgusting as a post could possibly be.

 

Yesterday's scores don't count today's ballgame. JFK's brains being splattered on film is proof how powerful presidents are.

As far as your personal disdain for me, well, bring it.

 

Well Bush did a pretty big stimulus, and it's likely McCain would've tried something like that also.

 

What stimulus did Bush do? TARP? Passed by A Democrat controlled congress with enough Democrats voting for it, for it to pass. Republicans could not have stopped it if they wanted to.

Actually according to T. Geithner in July 2011, all of the TARP money had been REPAID except for $50 billion deemed uncollectable. So TARP was not very expensive as government largess goes.
One little problem I have tho is the repaid money. That's in the neighborhood of $700 billion dollars. A stipulation of TARP was that any money repaid [I doubt they thought any would be repaid] MUST go toward reducing the National Debt only. NO other purpose. So if we have been repaid $600, or $700 billion, where dat money?

 

Paul running independent? I'd give it a 10% shot at best. It takes a billion dollars to run for President these days. Perot was a self funded millionaire, Paul's base are not the well-heeled.

Paul winning? Fuggedaboudit. He's going to take votes from Perry, so if he runs Obama is a lock.

 

Yeah TARP isn't quite what I meant but Bush did sign it. So you can't just blame Obama for bailouts.

I meant this stimulus http://articles.cnn.com/2008-02-13/...mic-stimulus-act-stimulus-bill?_s=PM:POLITICS. Remember when Bush sent everyone a check? Yeah that stimulus. But no Tea Party was running around calling him a socialist .

 

I already did.

You might write this on your palm so you remember it.

 

I'm online. Trust me, the palm of my hand isn't the best place to write stuff down.*drum roll*

 

hahahahahhahahahahaha

 

Use the other hand, not the 'Romantic" one.