Respectfully noted and agreed to. Unfortunately, changing thread titles isn't a power in my super-cool mod-powers menu /We'll just have to make do.
It is Sep. 2011. The election is Nov. 2012. NO ONE has been IN yet. Historically there are many possible surprises between now and the elections.
Remember......Obama has great debating skills. Yet look at what an awful president he's been. Bill Clinton could talk his way out of a paper bag, but one doesn't always want what he's selling. There's much more to being a good or even great president than debaiting skills. We are not likely to have the likes of a really GREAT Orator like Ronald Reagan again in our lifetimes. I'll be fine with either Romney or Perry. But Romney worries me in that I think he's far more likely to turn into a John McCain on us once elected and not be quite the conservative he pretends to be now.....in order to get elected.
Herman Cain would make the best president out of all of them. Romney won't be any better than John McCain would have been.
For me, it is Paul, Johnson, Cain; that order for now. I find I have virtually no interest in the others. If one of these three do not clinch the nomination, then it's all six to one, half dozen to the other, to me.
I think it was Rev. Al who had Johnson on today and the guy said a lot of good things, too bad he's a con and of course can't be trusted, at all.
He's not a Neo-Con...he's a Libertarian. You really should check out his issues page. Check out his immigration plan while you're there.
He 'leans' libratarian, and I see the Florida cons desperately wanted him kept out of the debate, so that's a big point in his favor. But while I'll keep an eye on him, he's got the universe to travel before I bend at all. Thanx for the links, I'll check it out.
I have said that its to early to pick a president out of the bunch. But after seeing Perry (I voted for him)I can honestly say hes a no vote for me.
