Is Bill O'Reilly Greedy?

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by mertex, Sep 21, 2011.

  1. texmaster

    texmaster Banned

    Joined:
    May 16, 2011
    Messages:
    10,974
    Likes Received:
    590
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Once again you misunderstand what he said. He said he wouldn't be able to keep his business side. He never said he would stop doing his show, just the business he runs that funds his charities.


    And if you are going to claim he made his tax rates up you better be able to prove it so go ahead. Quote him then quote the new york tax rates that back you up.
     
  2. paco

    paco New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2009
    Messages:
    18,293
    Likes Received:
    234
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You contradict yourself here. First you say that it is not Obama that raises taxes, but Congress. And then in the next paragraph you say that it was Reagan and Eisenhower that raised taxes. Which is it?
     
  3. supaskip

    supaskip Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2009
    Messages:
    4,832
    Likes Received:
    25
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Can't we have both :mrgreen:
     
  4. k995

    k995 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2011
    Messages:
    6,783
    Likes Received:
    680
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nope :

    "“If you tax achievement, some of the achievers are going to pack it in. Again, let’s take me. My corporations employ scores of people. They depend on me to do what I do so they can make a nice salary. If Barack Obama begins taxing me more than 50%, which is very possible, I don’t know how much longer I’m going to do this. I like my job but there comes a point when taxation becomes oppressive. Is the country really entitled to half a person’s income?”"

    He clearly says HE will stop with the show and it will costs a lot of people the job, why? Because he would be too taxed.

    Again that is BS first Obama doesnt tax second effective federal taxes are nowhere near 50% and nobody proposes this third even IF federal taxes would be raise so the effective tax rate would be close to 50, o reilly would still take home millions and he basicly says "thats too low for me" something I can hardly believe.





    I already gave effective federal tax rates (that what he was talking about) and they are close to 30% for the top 1% of incomes (wich I think fits for o reilly)
     
  5. bugalugs

    bugalugs Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2008
    Messages:
    9,289
    Likes Received:
    44
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Tiger Bill O'Reilly is the greatest leg-spin bowler this world has ever seen. He leave that Shane Warne for dead.
     
  6. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,707
    Likes Received:
    39,354
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Prove he does not pay a 35% marginal rate on earned income.
     
  7. The Mello Guy

    The Mello Guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Messages:
    110,126
    Likes Received:
    37,863
    Trophy Points:
    113
    really...no jokes that the blank screen would probably still beat MSNBC?
     
  8. texmaster

    texmaster Banned

    Joined:
    May 16, 2011
    Messages:
    10,974
    Likes Received:
    590
    Trophy Points:
    113
    LOL No CLEARLY he states its his corporations he will stop. How do you miss the obvious when you even quote it? He put it in the context of his businesses at the start.


    TOTAL Taxes not just Federal Tax. Stop being dishonest. Now, back up your BS. Taxes don't stop with the Federal income tax.
     
  9. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,707
    Likes Received:
    39,354
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    He is talking about HIS corporations, not Fox News Corporation.
     
  10. Iron River

    Iron River Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2009
    Messages:
    7,082
    Likes Received:
    161
    Trophy Points:
    63
    They can't spend it? Even if they have to invest it they will change the way they invest. They will not invest in the riskier projects, many of which are the cutting edge projects that bring new technology into the economy.
    So if a project is very good and may make the investor a lot of money he might decided that the return is too high. He doesn't want to get kicked up into the top bracket and end up with less total gain after taxes.
     
  11. The Mello Guy

    The Mello Guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Messages:
    110,126
    Likes Received:
    37,863
    Trophy Points:
    113
    so by "stop doing this" he means being a corporation?
     
  12. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,707
    Likes Received:
    39,354
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    His statement is clear.
     
    texmaster and (deleted member) like this.
  13. texmaster

    texmaster Banned

    Joined:
    May 16, 2011
    Messages:
    10,974
    Likes Received:
    590
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Do you not understand he has a paycheck as an employee for Fox News AND he runs a corporation for his charities? Simple question.
     
  14. k995

    k995 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2011
    Messages:
    6,783
    Likes Received:
    680
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Because the average tax rate for his bracket is far below that, if he does he needs to change accountant.
     
  15. k995

    k995 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2011
    Messages:
    6,783
    Likes Received:
    680
    Trophy Points:
    113
    SO? He stops with the o reilly factor that was what he says.


    Why total, he talked about obama, since when does obama determin state taxes?
     
  16. pragueman

    pragueman New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2009
    Messages:
    2,242
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    0

    I think his argument is (which I actually support) is so what? Is giving government more money, so they can waste more money, helping anything or anyone? We already have meter maids, cops and cameras all over our towns and cities who are just there to give out fines and collect more money from the government. Yes there are wealthy people in the states. Yes the income gap is a problem... How is giving this money to a wasteful, pompous government (republican or democrat) going to help the situation?
     
  17. HB Surfer

    HB Surfer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2009
    Messages:
    34,707
    Likes Received:
    21,899
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sadly, a guy from Prague understands the situation better than most Americans.
     
  18. The Mello Guy

    The Mello Guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Messages:
    110,126
    Likes Received:
    37,863
    Trophy Points:
    113
    thats a pretty cynical view of our laws and our law enforcement officers
     
  19. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,707
    Likes Received:
    39,354
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The marginal tax rate for that income group is 35%, he will pay 35% on the next dollar earned. If Obama raises taxes then he will pay that rate on his next dollar earned. He was correct in his statement.
     
  20. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,707
    Likes Received:
    39,354
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Because it is the total tax burden he was talking about when he asked the question how much does government have a right to take from someone in the form of taxes.
     
  21. The Mello Guy

    The Mello Guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Messages:
    110,126
    Likes Received:
    37,863
    Trophy Points:
    113
    isnt Bill O paying the corporate tax rate if hes a corporation?
     
  22. texmaster

    texmaster Banned

    Joined:
    May 16, 2011
    Messages:
    10,974
    Likes Received:
    590
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What are you talking about?

    The threat is against stopping his BUSINESS not his EMPLOYMENT. How many times must it be said?

    Because he says that is what he pays in taxes. NEVER does he say only Federal Income Tax.

    So again back up your BS.
     
  23. k995

    k995 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2011
    Messages:
    6,783
    Likes Received:
    680
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No the effective tax rate is more 25%he is more likely to pay 25% then 35%

    And he talked about obama raise it to 50 .
     
  24. k995

    k995 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2011
    Messages:
    6,783
    Likes Received:
    680
    Trophy Points:
    113
    He said 50% would be too high and he sees obama doing this. Obama cant even set the federal tax rate (but lets ignore this) let alone state tax rates.
     
  25. k995

    k995 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2011
    Messages:
    6,783
    Likes Received:
    680
    Trophy Points:
    113
    He said (and repeated it on the daily show) "stopping his show".

    http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-september-28-2011/bill-o-reilly


    Again watch this clip ON TOP of the 50% of obama he start listing state and other taxes, its clear he talks about 50% federal income tax, and then 50% EFFECTIVE federal income tax wich is doubling it.


    he also ,doesnt want to repond to the question if its a bit rediculus to say "anything lower then 3 million income after taxes isnt worth it"


    And again it completly ignores obama cant raise taxes, thats not his job.
     

Share This Page