Is forcing an infant to suckle from a milkless man-chest child abuse?

I AM NOT WATCHING THAT!!!!!!

 

Huh? We give attention to mass shooters.

 

Huh??

there have been more mass shooting this year than days ..it effects thousands , if not millions of lives


Here we have 2 obviously mentally impaired people with a child that effect practically no other people ..

somebody has allowed this to happen ..

seems this would be a case for the abortion rights crowd ..if a baby cannot be aborted it may be born and forced to suckle a man’s breast

news worthy it is NOT.

 

No i don't think they are NOT feeding the baby but giving it an empty bottle is cruel! We can all rest easy as they say later in the video they have decided to "SUPPLEMENT" with formula

 

Are pacifiers child abuse? Think.

 

Agreed. It isn't news worthy and apparently neither is the trans shooter manifesto. Also, good thing I don't work for a news network.

 

That's reaching, but I don't wanna ruin anything. I'm looking very forward to seeing what you post next.

 

How is an empty bottle all that different from a pacifier when it comes to "cruelty" or "starvation"? You clearly haven't thought about this very much.

 

an empty bottle was an analogy for his milk-LESS man bewb
its ok, i think everyone else understood it

 

But it's not an empty bottle to the newborn. It's simply something to suckle on. If it wasn't his nipple (I literally just shuddered with disgust writing that) it would have been a pacifier. In other words, newborns don't only suckle for nourishment. They also do so for soothing in between feedings.

 

So is a pacifier . . . which is literally a fake, milk-LESS nipple. It's okay. You are the only one who couldn't understand (or pretended you couldn't understand). It is either that or you think that pacifiers produce milk. Which is it? I look forward to your next evasion/excuse/pretending you don't understand.

 

He wants to keep pretending that he doesn't understand what pacifiers are. And he thinks someone out there will fall for it.

 

This is what we here in the REAL WORLD call "trying too hard".
please may I have some more??

 

YOU are the one trying to compare a pacifier (no milk) to a man bewb (also no milk)
The joke's on you and the best part is I didn't have to say a single THING
rock on!

 

There is nothing more "try hard" in pretending that there is a big difference (other than more burps, which has nothing to do with the discussion) between an empty bottle and a pacifier. But just keep pretending.

 

Both have no milk . . . that's what a rational person would call an accurate comparison. You said that an empty bottle was an accurate comparison, and I agree, but you can't understand how a pacifier is similar to an empty bottle. You are literally complaining that it isn't a good comparison because they are too similar.

You don't say a single thing because you can't think of any more excuses. You know that a pacifier is comparable to an empty bottle. Both are an artificial nipple producing no milk that a baby suckles on for soothing rather than for food. I'm sorry that your forgot that pacifiers exist until I brought them up.

 

Wow!! I thought this thread would get no attention

Why are some fascinated with this topic??

are trans people posting here ??

 

So do you think that is child abuse or are you gonna go with the excuse that they couldn't find a pacifier so he substituted with his man bewb instead? because in the ACTUAL VIDEO he/she seems SURPRISED and UPSET there was no milk

 

If you had actually read the thread, you'd know my position. What do you have against reading the thread and why do you feel the need to make up outright fantasies about "the excuse that they couldn't find the pacifier so he substituted with his man bewb instead." Dude, just actually read the thread. Quit pretending that it is hard to do. It's sad. And the thread is only 2 pages. And most of the posts you are refusing to read are ones you previously quoted.

 

That they did [as well as encouraging the lunatic fringe].

 

2 pages of mostly you trying to flip the thread into a thread about pacifiers in a desperate attempt to ignore the horrors in the video in the OP.
Congrats though because you deserve all the credit for making it hit page 2 and now we all know what a pacifier is as well thanks to your superior knowledge.

 

I addressed the OP. And please stop pretending that you care because you refuse to address what I said about the OP. I only brought up pacifiers when YOU called this starvation and YOU compared it to an empty bottle. Which YOU now acknowledge is comparable to a pacifier. Congrats on finally catching up.

 

Fair enough. You are kinda quick on that reply trigger finger and its hard to keep up. I did not see your very first post until now. Just to be fair, here it is

It's weird as hell and DEFINITELY deserves investigation, but it isn't "starvation" unless they aren't also bottle feeding. If it were, then we'd have to lock up every parent who gives their kid a pacifier. And it probably isn't abuse unless there is other stuff going on . . . which, again, should probably be investigated.

 

The video states it was a biological man and a biological woman. Your statement was factually incorrect. Not that you care

 

That's my bad. I'm leaving my current role and looking for a new one, so I have more time on my hands and am responding more quickly.