is it possible for science to prove & disprove the same thing?

Discussion in '9/11' started by groupthink, Aug 15, 2012.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,471
    Likes Received:
    1,721
    Trophy Points:
    113

    likewise an understanding of shattering.
     
  2. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    10,644
    Likes Received:
    3,694
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There are 2 failure modes for columns under compression.
     
  3. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Dustify being one of them...
     
  4. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,471
    Likes Received:
    1,721
    Trophy Points:
    113
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  5. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    10,644
    Likes Received:
    3,694
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Somehow i knew that Koko wouldn't know what those two failure modes were.

    So much for a demonstration of his understanding of the causes of stress / strain induced fracture.
     
  6. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,471
    Likes Received:
    1,721
    Trophy Points:
    113
    that because you like others of your ilk construct ill framed questions.

    there are 3 failure modes.

    You for got BIG BODDA FODDA BOOM!


    [​IMG]

    FODDA BOOM BOOM BOOM BAM SLAM BOOM

    [​IMG]


    SPARKLE FARKLE BOOMA LOOMA

    [​IMG]
    Oh and ^^^^^^^^^^^^ thats NBC LOL

    BIG FODDA SHROOMA BOOMA

    [​IMG]
     
  7. RPA1

    RPA1 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2009
    Messages:
    22,806
    Likes Received:
    1,269
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Good science demands proof in the form of repeatable experimentation. Anyone, using the same criteria can conduct the experiment and come up with the same result. Example: One can separate H20 into hydrogen and oxygen with an electric current. Anyone can do this.
     
  8. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    10,644
    Likes Received:
    3,694
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The question isn't the problem. The problem is that the respondent doesn't know the answer. That's because, despite the respondents instance that physics was violated in some way, it's quite evident that the respondent doesn't have a lick of knowledge on the subject of structural engineering, or the physics applicable therein.

    There are 2 failure modes for columns subject to compression. Those modes are crushing and buckling. Whether the failure mode will be one or the other is dependent on the slenderness ratio of the column and the stress - strain curve of the material the column is made of. Fracture is the final result of both modes of failure. A buckled column almost completely loses its ability to support load at the point of plastic deformation. At the point of fracture, it carries zero load. (just like the spaghetti)

    The main point of discussion that discredits psi's silly washer and paper loop model is not the fracture of the column. The main point is that the mass of the column is accelerated out from under the falling mass due to buckling. This means that perfect layers of mass did not impact perfect layers of mass just like his simplistic washer model.
     
  9. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,471
    Likes Received:
    1,721
    Trophy Points:
    113
    the answer however is once again BIG BODDA FODDA BOOM BAMAZOOMA

    See when you get BIG BODDA FODDA BOOMA
    [​IMG]

    DA WEIGHTA IS A TO MUCHA AND IT BUCKOS LIKA DATA
    [​IMG]

    HAFFA WAYA BATWEENA DA IMPACTA AND TOPPA
    [​IMG]
    VEWY VEWY CONVIENENTA

    MAKA DA SHROOMA LIKA DATA
    [​IMG]


    Simple physics boom and it all faws down!


    [video=youtube;OWgHMs-Yj9o]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWgHMs-Yj9o[/video]
     
  10. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    10,644
    Likes Received:
    3,694
    Trophy Points:
    113
    When you're ready to make a lucid response in English we can continue this conversation.
     
  11. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,471
    Likes Received:
    1,721
    Trophy Points:
    113
    what dont you understand
     
  12. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    10,644
    Likes Received:
    3,694
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don't understand why you think your posts are in any way a lucid response to the points and issues I raised with your puerile and unscientific picture based argument.
     
  13. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,471
    Likes Received:
    1,721
    Trophy Points:
    113
    really? its equally scientific to anything troughers use.
     
  14. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    10,644
    Likes Received:
    3,694
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Did you find where I "cut and pasted" that explanation of thermonuclear weapons from yet? Do you think it was from someplace sciency? I'll bet you do...
     
  15. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    koko can't even use the word 'troughers' correctly,and he takes someone else to task for their research?....


    LOL
     
  16. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,471
    Likes Received:
    1,721
    Trophy Points:
    113
    looks correct to me, whats your problem?

    its scientifically proven


    [​IMG]
     
  17. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,471
    Likes Received:
    1,721
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I have better h8ngs to do with my time
     
  18. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Run away,run awayyyyyyyyyyyy.


    getting anything from koks regarding 9/11 is like pulling teeth,apparently...
     
  19. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You have better 'hatings' to do with your time?

    Why all the hate? Bad report cards?
     
  20. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Life is full of hate when one lives in one's parent's basement and they can't get anything right in their posts. :lol:
     
  21. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,471
    Likes Received:
    1,721
    Trophy Points:
    113
    and the troughers are so weak they have been reduced to spelling nazis again!

    Hell they cant even get that right and they try to analyse the wtc demolitions LOL

    [​IMG]
     
  22. Alucard

    Alucard New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2015
    Messages:
    7,828
    Likes Received:
    41
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Scientific theories can conflict with each other.
     

Share This Page