Israeli President; Peres: Recognition of Jewish state 'unnecessary'

MEMRI....LOL.

 

Guardian

"Palestine is ours, from the river to the sea and from the south to the north. There will be no concession on an inch of the land,"....

 

You tube ..... AKA Trout University

 

Wait till she starts inventing countries to throw into the mix, it's hilarious!

 

I'd ask you what your experiences were and what it was like surviving F16 bombs with your name on them, tanks rolling over your personal donkey cart while Rachel Corrie played trip and fall outside your window and WP was injected into your mud hut while you scratched the dirt floor to find enough change to take a taxi to the air conditioned mall in Gaza but somehow feel you will come up short.

 

Nah, it's the College of Social Sciences and International Studies in addition to the European Centre for Palestine Studies at Exeter, UK.

 

Sanity at last!

Kudos!

 

Forget the countries, stick to Journal's like "The Lancelet".

 

It's you tube Trout. A non peer reviewed, unaccountable media in which anyone can post their opinion without challenge or accountability and is therefore useless as a source of proof for anything unless of course you are a UFO nut or Holohoax fan in which case it is the word of God or Allah or whatever you worship or put faith into.

I called it Trout Uni as your stuff seems to have all of the above traits.

 

Ilan Pappe will be glad of your insightful contribution.

 

Nah, the other two which used ten times as many clusters and were also peer reviewed and didn't have Soros funding are more accurate.

 

If he uses You tube to prove his stuff then I'm sure he would!

 

Yawn...As I illustrated, the funding was irrelevant and did not influence the conclusions and you haven't got a clue as to the comparative merit of differing variables that constitute the methodological process. Now grow up.

- - - Updated - - -

WTF are you babbling on about?

 

You have? How is it when you dismiss sources that don't agree with you out of hand and here ignore that one of the richest people on the planet who was rabidly anti war to the point where he funded anti wr ads and groups yet this study which was financed in great part by him is mysteriously hands off and exempt?

I do know that the IFHS used ten times as many clusters and was peer reviewed and was intended to be superior and all encompassing in order to lay the numbers question to rest.

You will have to stop frothing at the mouth, slow down a bit and read the comment to which it is in reply to in order to actually understand.

 

I'm bored with your nonsense Drew.

 

Of course you are. You make a wild a$$ed contention and when it is destroyed with quote, link and source and you're unable to vilify the source you become bored.

 

As I inferred, rhetorical flourishes of this nature are moot anyway so what's your point other than to post silly childish video clips?

 

Whatever....Yawn.

 

As you were 'eprted' for this ...

Anyhow, back to the thread;

His return to Gaza on film is childish?

And I suppose this is a simple rhetorical flourish as well as it is not backed up by deeds but rather Jihad ...

"(the Charter is) a piece of history and no longer relevant......."

 

Irrelevant in terms of the fact that your fantasy of Israel being wiped off the map is a fantasy.

 

Intent is relevant as he is being touted by many (including yourself) as a partner for peace when he still follows the Charter which calls for the destruction of Israel. That makes him and his organization a detriment to peace, not a partner.

 

Israel ain't going anywhere so quit with your paranoia. The side that's detrimental to peace is the country whose expansionist ambitions are curtailed by that very concept.

 

Because A) with the possible exception of Albania, living under a Muslim majority means no freedom of religion, B) All polytheists suffered mass genocide under the yolk of Islamic tyranny, C) Christians for the most part have been forced to flee or are currently suffering overt persecution and murder, D) the Jews have been nearly completely ethnically cleansed in line with the Arab Leagues Nazi doctrine of locking Jews into concentration camps and seizing their assets which all of the Arab League states codified into law.

The Muslims have absolutely zero claim to it, modern day Jews as proven conclusively by genetic testing are the indigenous people since prehistory and have had an unbroken presence there since the neolithic, but the Arab/Muslims did not arrive until the barbaric conquests of the imperialistic caliphates in unprovoked wars of aggression, ethnic cleansing, mass murder, and cultural genocide.

 

If a possibilty of a Judeo-Islamic state is there,
then difficulties of establishing a harmonious state could be vanquished.
But they are like oil and water, quite immiscible.
But as inhabitants of this planet both of them should have an entity and a rightful place to settle in.
The big question is with the abiding laws governing putting people in place are there any illegalities?.

 

Jews and arabs lived in Palestine in relative harmony before the ethnic cleansing doctrine of Zionism developed in Europe and precipitated the European colonisation . Once Zionism is again recognised as racist- as it was by the United Nations General Assembly in 1975- then harmony is again probable.
NeoZionism is a more brutal and expansionist form of the original and the transfer of populations breaches international and humanitarian law.