It was easy to prepare the towers for controlled demolition

Discussion in '9/11' started by Scott, Mar 29, 2013.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,262
    Likes Received:
    843
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I just came across this video.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3EQV223Y-M
    "How they rigged the towers (Skeptics see this)"

    I looks like rigging the towers was easy so nobody should be surprised.

    There seems to have been suspicious activity prior to 9/11.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2O7LwySqtr4
    1:03:55 time mark.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ga88UyXTvK4

    It all adds up.

    The fact that the towers fell at near free-fall speed...
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CG7I4UnoBnA

    ...and all of the other proof...
    http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=144746

    ...already shows that 9/11 was an inside job so this issue isn't about whether the government did it. It's about how the government did it.
     
  2. cooky

    cooky New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2011
    Messages:
    439
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Are youtube videos the best evidence you can come up with Scott? Do you believe everything you see on TV scott? I know you like to believe that scientific journals are corrupt but aside from the unsubstantiated opinions put forth in an unrelated youtube video that you posted neither you nor any of the other truthers on this forum have offered any evidence that the dozens of peer reviewed scientific papers that unequivocally refute the CD hypothesis are in anyway fraudulent or in error. One day you will realize that youtube videos and internet forums are not credible forms of persuasive media.

    One more thing... Your oft repeated claims that collapse at free fall speeds proves a CD occurred is a logical fallacy... Just so you know
     
  3. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Let me tell you something about demolition charges. If you do not have a shaped charge in contact with the surface it is intented to cut, it will not cut it. It will do no damge other than to blow all the contents of that floor sideways out the windows.

    Obviously, this did not happen. Xendirus is an idiot who never worked with explosives in his life. If you are going to present videos, bring some that actually contain evidence from a credible source.

    And that bald headed half-wit who claims to be a Republican is actually a Nazi piece of crap. You can tell by the way he cites a Nazi piece of crap as a source.

    And how many time do we have to tell you that Lindauer is just a random nut job who used to work for a couple of different congress critters before she lost her marbles?
     
  4. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,574
    Likes Received:
    1,747
    Trophy Points:
    113
    the only ones that I can see who do nazi is the troughers
     
  5. cjnewson88

    cjnewson88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,133
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Top video posted by Xendrius, who I have several videos debunking his insanity. He is a moron, ignorant of facts, spews lies and inaccuracies, talks about how airliners can be hijacked remotely (lol) and asked the viewers to 'imagine if.....'. Ridiculous. There is no logistical way explosives could have been planted inside buildings. At all. Furthermore, there is no evidence to prove so. You are clutching at straws scott, you have no real evidence, and you know it.
     
  6. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,574
    Likes Received:
    1,747
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Still living in the 20's are ya.
    wow you got a long way to go to catch up dont you!

    Keep on peddling your
    [video=youtube;quSlzNHtVrU]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=quSlzNHtVrU[/video]
     
  7. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Bollyn and Hufschmid are the fathers of Da Twoof. Nazi scum, both of them.
     
  8. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    If you have evidence, present evidence. You're just maundering now, which tells me you have sod all as usual.
     
  9. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,574
    Likes Received:
    1,747
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I want to talk with the guys who were in the buildings monitoring exactly what caused them to come down ince all you have is speculation and maybes and supposedlys and coulda beens

    - - - Updated - - -

    they work for the government? News to me
    you got a serious contradiction in terms going there.
    cognitive dissonance brewing maybe?
     
  10. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,262
    Likes Received:
    843
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The proof that it was a controlled demolition is so clear that even a layman can see it.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q3v4QUQpYjc
    "(NEW 2012 WTC DEMOLITION PROOF) DEBUNK THIS (REMAKE) RARE FOOTAGE"

    The really informative part of the above video starts at the 2:45 time mark.



    There seems to be a lot of deception on the part of those who did the official investigation.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pP4_8s-2Gmc
    "Clocking WTC7"

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SLIzSCt_cg
    "9/11: NIST engineer John Gross denies WTC molten steel (extended)"


    Anyone who looks at all of this info and still "Sincerely" maintains that the towers didn't fall because of controlled demolition should watch this video.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mEGgAk1AbA4
    "Psychologists help 9/11 truth deniers"


    If the links don't work, do YouTube searches on the titles under the links.
     
  11. cjnewson88

    cjnewson88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,133
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Well I did a debunking of his 2012 CD video a week after it came out and he had to remove it to add some more rhetoric.. It is trash, total insanity typical of xendrius. xendrius is impervious to correction, even when proven wrong on basic mistakes. Two fine examples, he claims UA175 turned off his transponder, and that an airliner can be hijacked by a computer remotely. When I explained to xendrius why both these statements are entirely false, and provided evidence to support, he didn't care, he kept telling the lie. Just like his misquotes of UA175 witnesses in the video Scott linked. He is a lying scumbag and the fact you are linking to his videos shows more about your character and gullibility than it does about your claims. What total junk.

    Ah the 'molten steel' claim again, and yet not one of your seekers of truth can tell me how does molten metal at in the wtc rubble prove controlled demolition? Why should this not be present in the rubble after massive fires?
     
  12. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,262
    Likes Received:
    843
    Trophy Points:
    113
    In this video of yours...
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0f6t4dMtc00

    ...you "Explained" that flight 77 hit the Pentagon. When I explained to you why you were wrong...
    http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/275987-few-debunking-links.html#post1061950663

    ...you kept telling the lie.

    I hope all the viewers have watched this video.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q3v4QUQpYjc
     
  13. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Actually, none of it is informative. The only persons who are not mentally ill or lying their asses off are those who thought that the plane looked military.

    Wake up, people. The plane was over most people's heads where they could not see windows, and United paints the lower surfaces of their aircraft in a color close to that of an Air Force transport.

    Schroeder suffers from obvious PTSD, probably side effects of his prescription meds and cocaine. Her saw a fireball and burning people issue from the elevator, but he can still hear. That was a deflagration of jet fuel, not high explosives. You have that on the word of a veteran fire fighter who has not blown his brains out with drugs.

    Sullivan is a liar. CDI says he is padding his CV. He is wrong about the noise level of cutter charges and how much room they would have to work in the elevator shafts. There is no way in hell they could access the columns to install thermite or HE charges without the building engineering department's knowing about it.

    He's a lying sack of (*)(*)(*)(*).



    That dimwit doesn't realize that those 2 seconds of free fall occurred after most of the internal structure of the building was gone. Further, the moron does not appear to have allowed for the effect of direction on apparent speed of the motion he was measuring. If the wall was leaning away from him, it would appear to fall faster than the base could crumple at the point of failure.

    Somewhere there is a high school that has a sub-standard science teacher.

    Show me the ingots.


    Given my own experience, I will put more faith in the testimony of healthy fire fighters over that of a shrink who has no relevant training.
     
  14. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,262
    Likes Received:
    843
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The firefighers in this video say they heard secondary explosions.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXD3bAbZCow
    (9/11 NYC Firefighters Controlled Demolition)

    In this link...
    http://www.question911.com/linksall.htm

    ...there's a three-part video called "911 Eyewitness 1of3 (WMV 48megs)". It confirms that there were explosions that wouldn't be consistent with a mere plane crash.

    Let's hear your analysis of this.
     
  15. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    None of that supports controlled demolition. Whoever put that video together know roughly SQUAT about fire fighting or building construction or demolitions.


    The idiot thinks that dust blowing out of the mechanical floors in an increasingly-heavy stream are explosive squibs.

    What a hopeless moron.

    I can't believe even you would send me to Klunkety-klunk Shafquat's site.

    Klunkety-klunk is the sound that that Nazi bimbo's head makes when she tries to think.
     
  16. allegoricalfact

    allegoricalfact Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2012
    Messages:
    3,339
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Female
    They just pulled the empty buildings.The rest is 'Hollywood'.
     
  17. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,262
    Likes Received:
    843
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You seem to know yourself that this response of yours would get you laughed out of the debating hall. I know you people will never admit to anything. I'm not trying to get you to admit anything as I know you won't. All I hope to do is post stuff that's too clear to obfuscate so you'll have to say lame things to maintain your postion. The only thing that matters is whether you're having any success. I'd say your success rate is close to zero.
     
  18. AlphaOmega

    AlphaOmega Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2013
    Messages:
    28,747
    Likes Received:
    4,821
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Do you go squatchin on the weekends?
     
  19. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Shafquat shows us a picture of a torch-cut column and insists that it is evidence of thermite. That useless sack of fail needs to go find some less harmful way to act like a ranting lunatic.
     
  20. cjnewson88

    cjnewson88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,133
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Why is everyone avoiding the question about molten metal? I really would love to know why truthers claim molten metal in the rubble of the WTC supports their CD claim and not the official collapse?
     
  21. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,262
    Likes Received:
    843
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The thermite issue isn't about whether the government did it. It's about how the government did it. One doesn't have to be an expert to know that a building wouldn't fall at near free-fall speed into its own footprint. That alone proves controlled demolition.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CG7I4UnoBnA
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ufZPFYOblKk
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDvNS9iMjzA
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UUdhdTXHcn4

    I don't have the background to opine on the thermite issue but it does fit the controlled demolition scenario.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pu0UwSurMw
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSh5o6ca8FM
     
  22. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,574
    Likes Received:
    1,747
    Trophy Points:
    113
    flowing molten metal below the wtc has been settled a long time ago no need to rehash the fact that they omitted it from their reports.
     
  23. cjnewson88

    cjnewson88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,133
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Settled by you avoiding the question? If it was "settled" then why are you so afraid to answer?

    I'll give you some help.

    No controlled demolition in history has ever left molten material and large fires in the rubble pile. Ever.
    The collapse of the WTC was due to multiple stories of very hot fires. When then fires continue in the rubble pile, add the insulation effect of the rubble, and you can easily get molten metal.

    Suffice to say, molten metal supports the official story. It doesn't fit your conspiracy theory. Unless, of course, you'd like you grab your stones and actually give me an answer instead of dancing around every question given to you??
     
  24. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,574
    Likes Received:
    1,747
    Trophy Points:
    113
    precious!
     
  25. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Irrelevant reply.
     

Share This Page