A beginner's course in grammar, spelling and having a point to make in conversion would help you a great deal.
This thread has deteriorated into another tantrum because at least one side refuses to admit that any evidence is needed.
koko reminds me of arguing with creationists. Every time you bring up carbon dating as a way to show the world is older than 6,000 years, their response is "speculation!". No evidence, no reasoning, just "speculation". What a pathetic cop out for an argument koko.
yeh that sucks. we keep asking for the database and hard evidence they used for the model of wtc7 and you keep refusing to post it. too bad
koko begs for modeling data but yet we all know he wouldn't know where to start when it came to using the modeling data.. I mean, this is a guy who has never even read page 1 of their reports.