Having just allowed enough time for viewers to forget that he punched a member of his Top Gear team for not providing a steak on demand, and who has redeemed himself somewhat on a show about his farm, he has now written in a popular newspaper ( if suited to those with an IQ of two digits) his opinion of MM. He hates her and wants to parade her naked through the streets while we throw excrement at her. Should Clarkson ever work for where the public sees his excuse for a human being again?
Their documentary doesn't really bash the royal family as much as it bashed the UK media, which is why the UK media is going nuts and trying to accuse them of bashing the royal family.
This is about Clarkson's personal remarks concerning MM published in the Sun last Friday. Not the Harry Megan Netflix documentary.
I think it speaks volumes about The Sun that no action has been taken against Clarkson's employment/contributions. The article was removed from their website at Clarkson's request.
The depth of the Clarkson vitriol is unhealthy. He's got serious issues that a bottle is not helping with.
Unfortunately he is not the only one. No wonder MM wanted to get away. It is he who should be in the stocks.
Clarkson is an out of touch dinosaur. But weirdly, also a role model for some. Just how it is. re markle, it's paradoxically not the worst thing he's done.
It could be one of the better things for her, revealing the kind of stuff she has had to deal with. OTOH someone with such views shouldn't, IMO be allowed any voice in public. There should be no role model for anyone so vile.
I would imagine the The Sun don't really care....assuming 16,000 people have clicked on the web page (or bought the paper god forbid) which contains the article and The Sun have therefore earned revenues from the views of the adverts contained within that web page! The Sun will be happy with that! The simple fact is that Clarkson draws an audient; he's a celebrity and he's also a marmite character...unless one lives on Mars one knows he's opinionated therefore one either loves him or hates him....there's nothing new about how he expresses his views or his venting his opinion on people. He laid into MM...so what?
I think that will only happen when people live rich and fulfilling lives, themselves. They won't need to virtually live alongside Clarkson - or Markle
Clarkson actually punched a producer. Clarkson was correct on Megan. Also, Harry is immature and dragged down by Megan, both are dickheads.
What gives you the right to pass judgement on the lives of people you don't know? If I had received bags full of the kind of misogyny exhibited here I would get as far away as possible too. Unfortunately it follows her as the press followed his mother. Clarkson has always been a loudmouthed toad who champions the worst in what used to be called masculinity. I personally find him repulsive but he has the ear of the press barons who live in the same area. The public are to blame for buying this *****.
I'm a Brit, watched him grow up, partied in a Nazi uniform with his blackfaced mate, and the other dressed up in KKK dress, then he met an American skank, married it and then denounced racism. And as piers Morgan correctly stated, "Harry is just riding on the coat-tails of his mother's tragedy". He's not Royal material and the total opposite of his brother William. Thank you for asking though.
When you said, "What gives you the right to pass judgement on the lives of people you don't know?", did you forget you on Trump??
I don’t understand how that makes you qualifies to know anything about Markle. I suppose if everyone referred to me as a spare part my whole life, I’d have some issues, too.
Trump is one of the most written about, analysed, self publicised and featured in the world. I doubt there is anyone so "known" in the world. I have heard him speak...the best primary source there is, and have formed a judgement. I doubt very much that you have heard so much from MM and H directly over the last 4 years.
So what you're saying is, you personally can pass judgement on some unknown length of time that was written on a certain person, but I can't because it wasn't long enough? That's one of the most bizarre crazy ideas I've heard in years.
Comprehension. So you can pass judgement on Trump because of the length of time things have been said about him but you can't on Markle because it's a shorter length of time. Bizarre. Utter utter bizarre.
What is bizarre is your lack of understanding. Of course you can pass judgement on those you know well rather than those you don't. Now go away. You are becoming a nuisance.
