Judge to hear arguments in Zimmerman's defamation suit against NBC

Oh that's the attitude, as long as, the folks doing the time are black.

 

How is your attitude different than mine ? Do you think it's ok and doesn't suck ?

 

Your attitude is a lot more ho/hum than mine on the subject matter.

 

I guess you missed the interview of 'John the Neighbor' and his testimony at trial..........geez.......the ignorance.

 

What have you done differently than myself ?

 

Alternative realities are sometimes created as a defense and/or coping mechanism.

 

I saw the entire testimony by John, the only thing he verified is that someone, most likely Trayvon, was on top of Zimmerman and punching downward.

He didn't see anyone getting their head slammed on the concrete, nobody did, except Zimmerman

 

So you agree that Trayvon was assualting GZ and GZ had a right to defend himself. We are making progress here. How did GZ get those bloody spots on the back of his head?..............a unicorn?.......LMAO at the delusion of the Trayvonistas.

 

Oh shut it...if there is anything I hate more than a conversation that starts out with "so you're saying", or "so you agree with" I haven't found it yet.

GZ could have slammed his own head on the concrete after shooting Martin, because he had previous knowledge of how to get away with it. Nobody knows because nobody saw the head slamming.

I know why you love Zimmermn, he's brought you one kid closer to your filthy whites only nation trailer park nation.

The only thing John's testimony confirmed is that Zimmerman is a (*)(*)(*)(*)(*) who got his ass kicked.

 

......and people who are getting their "ass kicked" have the right to defend themselves in all 50 states...........damn we are making progress here..........

 

You are literally all over the place.....You say John's testimony confirmed that he got his ass kicked ( assault) , but then claim some bull(*)(*)(*)(*) about him slamming his head against the pavement on his own ( LOL) . You last statement,

The only thing John's testimony confirmed is that Zimmerman is a (*)(*)(*)(*)(*) who got his ass kicked.

Completely legally justifies a self defense shooting...

 

You mean the two idiots who tweeted his address? Try not to exaggerate the problem.

George didn't get an "innocent" verdict.. He got "not guilty"... but, only a reckless fool would shoot an unarmed teen... Neighborhood Watch does NOT carry a gun or go on the prowl to intercept someone THEY think is suspicious. They wait for law enforcement.. Had GZ followed protocol, the cops would have arrived and found out that Trayvon was on his way home..

George killed Trayvon because of his vigilante mentality and his own paranoid Walter Mitty fantasies.

He could have just as easily shot YOUR son..

 

..................

- - - Updated - - -

Futility...................................(sigh)

 

Margo,

No such thing as an " innocent " verdict because one is already... Innocent. A jury just has to confirm it by delivering a not guilty. No, only a reckless fool would allow himself to be beaten to death . Trayvon was not on his way home as he had ample time to go home and never did. Only one with fantasies is you .

No, my son does not go around beating people up like a thug.

- - - Updated - - -

Yes, that is all you really have left. A blank stare.

 

In law not guilty does NOT mean innocent... it simply means the prosecution case was weak.

Do you NOT understand Neighborhood Watch regs? Why do you suppose dimwit George created such a huge liability for the Homeowners??? The irony is that George was NOT a homeowner.. He couldn't even pay his own rent..

- - - Updated - - -

Is your son pursued in the dark by a stranger who is too stupid to speak and diffuse the situation?

 

Margot,

We are all innocent till proven guilty, no matter how much you hate it. A jury never is in charge with saying " innocent" , because that already is assumed till proven otherwise. All a not guilty verdict does is confirm ones innocence. Deal with it .

I dont care about George's rent and other weird stuff like you do, so I am not really interested. Neighborhood watch regs are as worthless as a vhs player.

 

Yes, the stare of futility.

 

Your white flag of surrender is noted.

 

Yeah sure, I surrender, and I'm also Hitler, aaand I hate freedoms, aaand hate whiter people, aaand lets see, I have liberal white guilt, and I want welfare spending increased, and I want Muslims to take us over......

There....better?.....let me know what I left out. I want your straw man suit to fit me perfectly.

 

Could he have been getting his ass kicked because Trayvon was trying to defend himself.

 

You left out troll . Anywho , if you'd like to put away your flag and explain why George was not legally allowed to defend himself , I'm all ... Eyes ?

 

That's not what the evidence suggested or what the jury found........but you can keep tilting at windmills for the next 50 years or so.......LOL

 

The police and the prosecutor felt George Zimmerman had not committed a crime until the President of the United States, the Attorney General, and Al Sharpton joined the lynch mob.

There was evidence that George Zimmerman was defending himself. George Zimmerman had called the police. Trayvon called his girlfriend. If Trayvon had not attacked George Zimmerman the police would have arrived and no one would have been killed.

The lynch mob will lie till they die. They have to.

 

That's what your father said about JW Milam and Roy Bryant.

 

My father never mentioned those names to me...........so try again......I'm quite sure you will be talking about Trayvon till the day you die......because you got snookered by the MSM and Obummer before you knew the facts..........and now you can't let go......its really sad. Trayvon was an unsupervised, school suspended, Purple Drank swilling, jewelry thieving, feral street thug.......who picked on the wrong person........you and Spike Lee can attempt to make him a saint......but it doesn't change the facts or the jury's verdict.