Julia Gillard - a dictator - she just wont listen!

No one is listening to Mr. Abbott either, to me he appears to be a compulsive liar, he seems to have two faces, because you can have two people with two different opinions one on his right and the other on his left and they will both be given two different answers to the same question. He cannot be trusted. He has given out no real policies since he has been leader of his party; all he has given us is fear and mischiefs’ muck racking he is definitely not a man I would/will be trusting with running my country, my homeland. However I no longer trust anyone in politics or any government, or it's agencies. I trust my own instincts. Ms. Gillard is talking the talk, and walking the walk the opposition is not, Have a good day TCH

 

Nah it was going at a fair klick and was sliding on the ground before it hit.

 

Yea, opposition parties are known for having lots of policies available... not. I remember all the Howard elections were the ALP waited until the last minute before releasing their policy alternatives... the rest of the time it was throwing mud nonstop. Now tables are turned, when the Libs return the favor the ALP engages its broad union backed PR machine to convince people that Abbott doing the very same thing is somehow a crazy bad person... LOL.

Problem with Abbott is he is too smart and will try and answer what he thinks you really mean and this allows the media to ask the same questions in slightly different ways and portray him as either double faced or confused, when in reality he is neither of those things.

 

Tony Abbott is a loser. He wasn't even going to let Craig Thompson go to the birth of his child, then after opposition, he finally relented and said that the Coalition was compassionate and that is why he chose to let Thompson go. Liar!

 

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BmP2Vy8K0i0"]The pentagon was not hit by a airliner. See for yourself - YouTube[/ame]

 

LOL

This i suppose comes from your vast experience of seeing buildings and paddocks hit by cruise missiles and air craft, then comparing the damage.

RAOFPMSL.

 

Hitting the poles etc before hand would have damaged the wings and engines letting fuel escape before it hit the building, and so if you look at the size of the initial fireball perhaps the fuel was already leaking out into the air, wheras the twin towers carried their loads into the structure. The Pentagon is also a building designed specifically to be survivable against attack so would have lots of features to that end.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVDdjLQkUV8&feature=player_embedded#!

 

Okay people, this thread had nothing to do with the events of 9/11, so lets get back on topic or I shall lock this thread.

 

With those comments you have already killed it, so what the heck.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0R8b3MuFxk"]Undeniable Proof a Plane did NOT Hit the Pentagon on 9/11 ~ 1/8 - YouTube[/ame]

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yinRBkGX0Bc"]Undeniable Proof a Plane did NOT Hit the Pentagon on 9/11 ~ 2/8 - YouTube[/ame]

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5mT8Jbcd-A"]Undeniable Proof a Plane did NOT Hit the Pentagon on 9/11 ~ 3/8 - YouTube[/ame]

This series has 5 more sections if you can be bothered.