Kyle Rittenhouse Book Sparks Uproar

https://www.newsweek.com/kyle-rittenhouse-book-sparks-uproar-1845143

I never understood why the left wanted this poor kid to just keep running from a pedophile, allow a domestic abuser to hit him with a skateboard, and let a drunk driver point a gun at him. He's less of a scumbag than Hunter Biden, who democrats love.

I for one, won't be reading this though. It's not that interesting. I'm sure a lot of his biggest fans want an in depth, embellished personal account of the the two minutes or so that he was on trial for, but I can't see that as being something worth spending time on.

 

Pre-emptive post:
Not guilty x5
Your opinion doesn't matter.

 

Who knows?
Maybe because he never should've been there in the first place?

 

Heck, why not? It's one way to make money if you're famous and you don't want to work.

 

Wait....
Because he should he have never been there...
...the left wanted this poor kid to just keep running from a pedophile, allow a domestic abuser to hit him with a skateboard, and let a drunk driver point a gun at him?

Speaks rather poorly of the left, doesn't it?

 

So how does your opinion on whether or not he should have been there impact change whether or not he can shoot a pedophile chasing him?

Let's try this another way.

A man tries to rape a 17 year old at a bar. She stabs him. Does she lose the right to self-defense because she "shouldn't have been there in the first place"?

 

If it isn't that interesting (and it definitely isn't), why start this thread? Surely, you wouldn't be trolling.

 

the crocodile tears were for what again...

 

Appreciate your confidence in the legal system. Keep that energy for you know who

 

If it definitely isn't interesting, why comment on it, using your logic at least?

 

am I the only reader that chuckled at this thread??

this kid is a high school dropout...

no way does rittenmouse have the vocabulary or literary ability to write a book

somebody interviewed the kid , then put his story to pages ..

also ,

anybody that has ever did the slightest investigating of writing a book , the first rule is

dont write an autobiography...very few people have interesting lives .much less a life that can be made a book

I am still waiting on rittemouse's defamation lawsuit against CNN

oh wait...

to prove defamation, a plaintiff must prove he/she did not do what they were said to have done
or they were not the person that was reported of being ..rittenmouse is exactly the punk he was reported to be

this is why people could report Michael Jackson was a pedophile and he could not sure for defamation.

jackson could not prove he was not a pedophile

rittenmouse was called a idiot kid that had no business roaming the streets with an AR 15

and as a result rittenmouse killed 2 and shot one ..these are facts

any book claiming to be written by rittenmouse will be purely fiction ..

 

Rittenhouse should be an inspiration to young 2nd Amendment advocates.

 

Isn't it already illegal to be roaming the streets after a curfew?

 

God bless him! Curse the communists and poisoners of children!

 

The jury didn't think so.

 

*sarcasm on*
Only if she legally uses a gun.
*sarcasm off*

 

Thats how many books are written. At least autobiographies (which I assume this is). People who arent writers hire writers to turn their ramblings into readable material. Its very common.

 

False
To prove prima facie defamation, a plaintiff must show four things:
1) a false statement purporting to be fact;
2) publication or communication of that statement to a third person;
3) fault amounting to at least negligence;
4) damages, or some harm caused to the reputation of the person or entity who is the subject

False
There are no news organization that claimed Jackson was a pedophile.

False
The result of the 2 dead convicted criminals and the one shot criminal were of their own making.
They attacked Rittenhouse and the jury confirmed this.
So if you want to claim Rittenhouse had no business being there, then the same goes for the criminals he shot.

You have no idea what will be in the book.

 

Uproar? I doubt many people knew he wrote a book, but claiming it causes "uproar" is one way of trying to market it. I wish him luck selling his book. I doubt he has any interest in an actual job, so selling books to his fan base is one way to make some money.

 

Yep, Rittenhouse was the ONLY one killing people that day. That immediately makes him a hero in RW, gun-loving extremist world. They'll be buying this book, and that's what he is relying on, so he can make profit from the ONLY significant day in his life, the day he killed two people.

 

But if it was the rapist and the other two convicted criminals who killed Rittenhouse, the left would make it a best seller and chanting at their trial.
Funny how that works.

 

Would have, could have. Nobody killed people that day but Rittenhouse. Newsflash, if you walk about in a riot brandishing an assault rifle and ending up shooting people, people MAY become defensive. I don;t blame them going after someone they perceived as an active shooter.

 

Oh.... he WROTE a book... I misunderstood.... I thought he finally read one.

Tiny bit of credit for grifting by doing something slightly more than just asking for money.

WTFL (White Trash for Life)

 

Nobody else was dumb enough to chase and threaten an armed citizen. Goes to show how dumb the idiots chasing Rittenhouse were.

Newsflash, if you don't assault people brandishing an assault rifle, you don't get shot. Just like the other 99.9999999% of the people participating in the riot.

Yet he didn't shoot anyone until he was attacked by these criminal. Making your coveted criminals even dumber.
How can you be an active shooter, when you haven't fired on anyone.
Thats the dumbest excuse yet.

You think you have the right to attack someone just because they are legally carrying a firearm because you decided he was an active shooter?
Play stupid games, Win stupid prizes.
Hence NOT GUILTY. lol

 

Love when Dems attack someone and only end up massively enriching them, and that enrichment is widely publicized. It’s the best