Kyle Rittenhouse Book Sparks Uproar

Manslaughter is unrelated to anything Rittenhouse did because his actions were clearly self-defense. The prosecution had no evidence to the contrary.

And you should look up the statute for "child neglect," it has nothing to do with any action or lack of action on the parent's part. You claim to "believe in law" and then repeatedly say you want to apply a law like "child neglect" to the parents. You also claim Rittenhouse wasn't innocent when he was in fact innocent as determined by a jury, most of whom told the judge during the selection process that they were biased against Rittenhouse due to what they had heard from the media. That's not believing in law. That's believing in a perversion of law to fulfill your political ideology.

Let me know when you read the statute for child neglect so you can stop repeating this baseless accusation.

 

Not guilty x5
Your belief, apparently, is unsubstantiated.

The DA disagreed. Why is he wrong, and why are you right?

The DA disagreed. Why is he wrong and why are you right?

 

what day did child neglect become a political ideology??

rittenmouse was a legal minor at the time...

he was a high school dropout and did not have the wherewithal to obtain a drivers license..he obviously did not have the ability to make rational decisions

just because the DA did not charge him does not make him or his parents innocent

would you allow a minor member of your family to roam the streets with a weapon during a riot??

I stand by my point ..

the kids parents should have told him

"get in the house with that weapon before you kill somebody"

being found not guilty does not mean innocence ,,rittenmouse was not innocent

niether was OJ and neither is trump and niether is hunter biden

 

^^^^
Says all that need be said.

 

irony.
in the USA everyone is PRESUMED INNOCENT until CONVICTED after a FINDING OF GUILTY beyond A REASONABLE DOUBT

since KR was not convicted, the law presumes he is innocent. He is thus innocent as a matter of law and that is the ONLY THING THAT COUNTS. If you claim he is a criminal or guilty that is DEFAMATION PER SE and he could win a defamation suit against anyone who claims otherwise

 

I didn't say child neglect was a political ideology. I suggested the reason you keep falsely accusing the parents of child neglect is because this is a politically charged case and bias is pushing this false and libelous accusation. If you have any idea whatsoever of what child neglect is you wouldn't be saying this. Repeating this blatant falsehood without evidence is likely due to political beliefs.

How many fallacious arguments did we manage to fit into this sentence?

They are 100% innocent. READ the statute. It is completely unrelated to your accusation.
1. Everyone is innocent until proven guilty.
2. The statute has absolutely nothing to do with your accusation. Your child engaging in lawful behavior is not child neglect.

 

defining child neglect is pretty simple

it is neglecting a child ..the end

how many defamation lawsuits has rittenmouse filed??

he was supposed to be suing Biden at one point

to win a defamation lawsuit, the plaintiff must prove he/she did not commit the actions they were accused of

kinda like micheal jackson ..he was accused and arrested for being a molester of children

but to win a defamation lawsuit he would have to prove he was NOT a child molester

rittenmouse cannot prove he did not do the things he was accused of doing

he shot 3 people and 2 of them are graveyard dead

the end

 

he rid the world of two mopes-one was a child molester. All three were scum bags. Are you mad that he owned a gun? or that he deprived Biden of two voters? or that the BLM rioters lost this one?

 

You said you were for "law and order" and then said the parents should be CHARGED with child neglect. You can't charge parents unless you use the law, which it turns out was never actually something you were advocating for. Punishing people based on political ideology seems to have been the ultimate the goal.

This is my shocked face.

 

He isn't being exploited, that makes no sense. And you can be incorrect in your estimation of wealthy if you want. His life won't be normal, as most wealthy people don't have normal lives. But it will be great.

Most Americans saw an educated hero who stood his ground and came out victorious in the face of leftist terrorists.

Many in the irrational portion of left hates him.

I hope more people stand their ground in the face of left wing violence.

 

Makes zero sense.

He is allowed to serve his community and provide medical aid and put out fires.

He is also allowed to defend himself without being charged. He showed tremendous discipline and restraint.

2 of them paid the ultimate price at the hands of the righteous.

 

I get it...

he is your hero....he killed 2 people and that makes you happy

but he is NOT educated ,,he dropped out of school and worked as a lifeguard
if he was smart he would at least had a year round job

I too hope more people stand up against violence.,, from both the right and left


I also hope the peacekeepers are of legal age and have been professionally trained ...we dont need juvenile vigilantes

 

He killed 2 terrorists that were trying to kill him. Yes that makes me happy.

He is absolutely educated. Is even going to college again.

We need more people like him.

 

He wasn't being a peacekeeper he was defending himself. And he isn't brave for doing that it's for surviving the legal attempt to persecute him.

The dragon he slayed wasn't your precious pedophile or your domestic abuser. It was the system that tried to punish him.

What kind of ****ed up justice system tries to punish a kid for defending his life against scum of the earth?

 

That's not the accomplishment he looked like a scared boy running for his life forced to take a life because of the bloodthirsty mob that was around him.

His feat was standing as well as he could as his country and the slime bag vultures in the media did their best to convict this poor kid. Because he dared be somewhere where their viewers wanted to rape murder and pillage.

I have no sympathy for a barbarian that falls in the act of barbarism but the left sure does.

I remember him mentioning something about law school. Though that is a long battle.

 

Hey, come on now!! Hunter isn’t even on trial yet….

 

Yep and some irrational lefties tried to stop it from happening. But latest update is he is in school.

 

your concept of what is right and wrong is based on your political agenda that you don't like lawful gun owners defending themselves from thugs who have a similar political agenda as you do. what KR did was LEGAL and JUSTIFIABLE meaning it was proper under the laws of our society

 

well if the BLM rioters weren't there, he most likely would not have come

 

wow!!

the lawyers are responsible for him surviving the legal attempt to convict him of murder ..

rittenmouse did nothing except as told during his trial..."put on this suit and keep your mouth shut" ..he followed orders

I agree...rittenmouse was NOT attempting to be a peacekeeper,,,this is why he needed a weapon
rittenmouse was playing cops and robbers ...but with a real live weapon

the night of the murders, rittenmouse was nothing but a neglected child allowed to roam the streets with a
military style weapon and looking for trouble...it was NOT his job to protect property that he did not own
nobody hired him ..he should have been told to get off the street with that weapon before he kills somebody

and I agree..rittenmouse beat the system..him and OJ should join up and write a book and then turn it into a movie of the week

what would be a good title??

"how to beat the justice system"



a responsible parent would never allow their child to take a weapon to a riot ..

 

Who told you that? Its not up to the defendant to prove anything.
Never has been, never will be.
The prosecution has to make its case beyond a reasonable doubt.
What country do you live in?

He doesn't have to prove squat

Maybe attacking someone with a AR-15 isn't very smart.
But again, rioting and burning down buildings or being a pedophile or woman beater isn't very smart either.

 

No it is your political ideology. The us military and law enforcement would never send a 17 yr old into such a situation, let alone by themselves.

Yet here we have some internet soldiers saying different.

 

The only reason KR and others were down there is because the local Mayor wouldn't allow law enforcement to stop the riots.
The cops were standing on the sidelines for a week not doing anything.
So the business owners got tired of having their businesses destroyed so they recruited people willing to defend their properties.
But you just hate it when your fellow criminals get shot while rioting, burning down peoples businesses, and looting.
Then you come in here with your armchair quarterbacking blaming those who will defend their local businesses?
How brave of you to do so.

 

If you want to make the argument, the city's officials and law enforcement did a poor job during the mayhem, fine, but sending a 17 yr old with a rifle didn't help.

 

Seems to me it helped a lot. Once the news got out about the shooting, the Mayor, (wanting to cover his own ass) forced the riots to shut down with local law enforcement.

Really, You don't know much about the Vietnam war, do you. 17 year olds could enlist with a parent signature.
12 soldiers on the Vietnam memorial were 17 and 6 were 15.
And hundreds of 17 year olds served.