Levelling the playing field: How to keep more jobs in America

Discussion in 'Economics & Trade' started by effectivenation, Dec 12, 2011.

  1. themostimproved

    themostimproved New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    817
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Indeed. Marxism predicts short terms increases in stability by foreign trade correct? as capital finds more labor to exploit, making capitalist profit not fall as quickly.
     
  2. Reiver

    Reiver Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    39,883
    Likes Received:
    2,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    We'll have to get a Marxist in to confirm that, but sounds reasonable to me!

    We do have the anarchist analysis that suggests globalisation is a reaction to domestic union success. That also has some similarity with the political economic analysis into multinational corporations (but that's more about underpayment, rather than unemployment)
     
  3. Someone

    Someone New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2010
    Messages:
    7,780
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It's not all costs, you know. Worker safety reduces costs elsewhere, assuming that the company has an interest in keeping trained workers working. Organizational efficiency goes up when you're not losing people regularly to workplace injury, and training costs go way down.

    The idea that there's some sort of conflict between safety and efficiency is, for the most part, imaginary. It's a false dilemma.

    The only effective way to do this is to impose tariffs on products produced unsafely. That's problematic because of our involvement in the WTO and various free trade agreements.

    The inefficiencies of production in China and other places in the third world are causing some companies to move back to the US, or to move to the EU. It's not really as cheap as they thought.

    Worker ownership would end outsourcing immediately. No worker would vote himself out of a job.
     
  4. Not Amused

    Not Amused New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2011
    Messages:
    2,175
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What does Marxism predict if trade doesn't occur?
     
  5. Reiver

    Reiver Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    39,883
    Likes Received:
    2,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    We need a Marxist to educate us. However, I'd refer to how trade would be forced through militarism (with the gain then to be had by also enforcing the same class divides on the foreign population)
     
  6. Clint Torres

    Clint Torres New Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2011
    Messages:
    5,711
    Likes Received:
    76
    Trophy Points:
    0
    My point exactly. The South American Bond markets were always great investments since the mid 90s. China and a host of other asian countries have caught on to that in the 2000s.

    As I have said in the past and on many threads the USA will continue to decline economically but the USA's investment market will still thrive for many years after it's econmic fall.

    Best part about overseas capital gains is the tax for it can be smaller depending on the country of the investment. BOVESPA is looking stronger each year. Even the Mexican Market is doing well.

    And these are countries who play no part in war with the rest of the world, never has and never will. That is why their future outlook is grand.
     
  7. Clint Torres

    Clint Torres New Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2011
    Messages:
    5,711
    Likes Received:
    76
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Now this is some good information I can use. thanks.
     
  8. Supposn

    Supposn Guest

     
  9. Reiver

    Reiver Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    39,883
    Likes Received:
    2,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You want to turn us to the follow of mercantilism. Ain't going to happen, even with influence groups attempting to impose costly protectionism
     

Share This Page