Lithuania Writes Guerilla Manual For Russian Invasion

I can't decide which is funnier - the ignorance or the xenophobia.

Friends don't insult friends, and if I need any advice regarding who I should pay attention to I'll let you know.

In what year did you emigrate from the United States?

 

Oh you spare ME. first of all, sweden never asked for help, and we were never attacked anyways, and even if we did, the US was neutral. I mean, drop the bs, the US only joined because it was attacked itself. Hardly an altruistic move. A perfectly legitimate position by the US I might add (same as the Swedish one btw), but the point is you didn't do squat for us. If the US really gave lives "for europe" where were you in 39?

and secondly, for the eastern european countries... you didn't do (*)(*)(*)(*) for them either. in fact you just helped the USSR who would go on to occupy them, so there you go. They don't owe you anything. I have told you, I don't like this combination of ignorance and disrespect. Particularily with the eastern european countries.. How you speak about them is just deplorable, considering the facts.

 

First the Vikings is not a nationality. Vikings is Pirates of the northern seas. Among them were representatives of different nations.
You are right that the Viking culture had a definite impact on the European people.
The impact of the Vikings into different languages ​​were of unequal strength, but certainly it did not pass without a trace. In the old Russian just a few words ( "sneak", "Ladoga" and some others), French (across Norman dialect) of more, for example, words such as équiper ( «fit», from OE Scand skipa.), rogue (, from OE and Scand hrogn hrókr.), etc. But the most unusual is allocated to the Romance languages ​​system of numerals after 60:., where Spanish, Portuguese and Italian for "80" will ochenta, oitenta and ottanta (. lat octoginta), stands in the French quatre-vingt (literally: "four times by Twenty ")...Even more scandinavism in Irish.....

About Vikings are many myths. Not related to the reality. For example horned helmets.

"Father," "horned" Viking helmet is considered Karl Emil Dёpler, who designed the costumes for the Wagner opera "Der Ring des Nibelungen" at Bayreuther Festspiele in 1876 may have impacted on Dёplera Celtic bronze 'helmet with Vatreloo bridge " found in England in 1868. It does not apply to the Viking age, and is separated from it by 8-9 centuries. Whatever it was, like helmets usually performed decorative or ceremonial functions. From the Viking Age reliably known only one Scandinavian helmet with small horns.

 

Had the US not intervened, you'd be speaking German. All of Europe would have fallen. Don't care if you were "neutral" Hitler would have taken your country. Now I will say this, Russia gave even MORE for Europe. They sacrificed a lot to help Europe remain free from hitler. Granted, they had other motives, the facts stand.

I'd really like to avoid another one of those things so I'm not going to cry over a spilled Crimea. What did we do about Georgia when Bush was President? What is Obama doing about the disputed Asian islands?

Do you not see the politics behind your accusations?

 

I am a citizen of Russia. And very happy about it.
But Now, many are emigrating from the United States. For example Steven Seagal today received Russian citizenship.

P/S:
You certainly can not say when you emigrated from the USSR, but you can not hide a high level of Soviet education.
Even though your hate Russia .... But I can easily explain your hatred...It is not uncommon for migrants - to hate the former homeland.

 

Jesus christ.. Russia "gave"? for europe?? this is (*)(*)(*)(*)ing ridiculous. Russia fought to expand their own empire, not to help others. You could even argue some countries fared worse under soviet occupation than they did under the nazis. Don't you understand, movitations matter? Russia didn't fight "for" europe. And neither did the US. I suppose western europe can be thankful for that you didn't occupy them afterwards like Russia did.. but the point is that this whole notion of that either of you "gave" anything is stupid and shows a lack of knowledge of history. if you only act when attacked yourself (as you did), and if you fight to expand your empire (as russia did) you are NOT giving anything. NO ONE had the motive "hey lets just altruistically help people". stop pretending

That is very different from what sweden and estonia are doing today in afghanistan. Why are we there? We are there EXPLICITLY to help the US. It's not as if we were going to fight the taliban anyways, and the US is just enjoying the side effects. No, we are there because of you. our motivation is to help. We are, literally, fighting for you. If you can't get the difference between that, and what the US did in ww2.. get a new brain

but again, the point is about specific countries, like estonia. Estonia has sacrificed for you, but you want to abandon them. Look at your pathetic and disgusting justification: Estonia should be grateful you say, because you supposedly sacrificed lives for them in ww2. But what did the USA do when hitler and stalin divided up eastern europe, and USSR invaded estonia? Nothing. On the contrary, you allied the USSR, and when the war was over you let them keep estonia. I'm not criticising what the US did or did not do.. I am criticizing your disgusting notion that estonia somehow should be grateful to you, or even worse, to russia. What you are saying is so ignorant and morally reprehensible. maybe, if you actually knew history, and had a clue about what you were talking about, you would realise how horrible the things you are saying are, and you'd feel shame.

 

I think it would be an awesome idea for the US to abandon NATO. Or NATO countries start paying more of their share.

 

You get it wrong,
Lithuania is Russia's pain in the a$$.
Never a nonsense when Russia did something to Georgia and the 2008 Ossetia war.

 

"....and the Propaganda War of Russian Media followed""". Because of the monument? Could You call the facts?

Excuse me.
"the Propaganda War of Russian Media"
I understood that this is a call for war against Lithuania.
Or is it just an information war?

 

Isn't not at least not the same?

Media is used for Propaganda all around the world in many things ... even in economic things! It is always a point how the pure "news" is solt to public and here you can do in different way to create opinions!

 

1 + 1 = 2 it is a fact. It can not be evil or good.
If you are irritated 1+1=2, then how about 1+1=3? Lithuania plays according to the second embodiment.

PS
I do not know what you want to say, but I will explain the meaning of the word "Возлюбленные".
this means approximately - "Beloved"

Romeo and Juliet were "возлюбленные". ( not lovers )
Romeo is Juliet's "возлюбленный".
Juliet is Romeo's " возлюбленная".

The priest may appeal to the congregation with these words.
Возлюбленные чада мои.
"Возлюбленные" children of my own.

 

Of course not!!!

Compare phrase.
1 ... Lithuania it is a fascist state. A shame!!!
2 Lithuania insolent ... !!! Or Lithuania restores a monument or war !!!
We will have teared the Lithuania to pieces as lines in the British flag !!!

Do you feel the difference?You might not hear from the Russian the №2

 

Europe has taken offense at Russia for what residents of the Crimea decided to return to Russia ? Is Russia to blame for this? Is not Ukraine? ( I recall that the Crimea was being occupied by an independent Ukraine for 23 years. 1991 - 2014)

 

It sounds more correct as:
Ай эм дуин а гуд джёб аз э просекутор?

You are trying to do this job very much. But you can not tear a hole in the defense of the lawyers.

 

You know that it's the invasion by Russia that is the problem. Even IF the crimean referendum was legal, russian military had no business invading crimea prior to that. You can't retroactively justify an invasion like that.

И маде а транслитератион, нот а транскриптион. Мы Руссиан ис нот со гоод, йет

 

You repeat what you are being said by the  truthful Western free media.
A Fact without context.
For example.
Fact: The truck hit a pedestrian, but the authorities did not arrest the driver killer.
Context:
This pedestrian committed a crime,  decamped from the police, and ran the carriageway on a red light.
Could you feel the difference?

In the case of Crimea.....
The Western mass-media said that Russia invaded Ukraine. Russia invaded Crimea. Russia seized Crimea.

something like this debility film:

.




…. But your Media "forgot" about the context.
In Ukraine, there was a coup d'etat.
This happened with the help of a foreign country (USA).
Crimea residents do not want to live under rebel authority.
Crimea Residents greeted the Russian "invaders" as the defenders against the Kiev rebels which seized a power in Ukraine.

.
[video=youtube;WS0Ldg6YaZQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WS0Ldg6YaZQ[/video]

.
This is not an excuse. This is the context of the fact that "Russia has invaded the Crimea."

.

 

Well, maybe others NATO members don't border Russia and they don't need for a such brochure [:

 

Oct 28, 2016 - Lithuania published a manual for its three million citizens Friday on how to defend their homeland in the event of invasion by Russia.

Why would 3 million Lithuanians fear Russia?

 

They are not afraid of Russia. They want to attract attention. They want the money they were given. They earn money these way.

 

2 quesions:

1) Isn't "rebel authority" was recognized as legitimate authority by all countries including Russia?
2) How do you know what Crimea residents want or what they don't want?

 

1) ask this question to those who support the rebels, who made a coup in Kiev.
2) Crimea Residents themselves have said that they want. And CNN is recorded it for history.

[video=youtube;ydGE8TN0MQA]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ydGE8TN0MQA[/video]