Megyn Kelly slams non-binary ‘Transformers’ character who goes by ‘they/them’: ‘This is disgusting’

Involuntary celibate. Look it up. I mean it's only been discussed in hundreds of threads on this forum alone.

Exactly, which means the encouragement and resources to be straight or gay, cis or trans. They need the highest chance at happiness for them, not for what you think their happiness should be.

 

Medical intervention doesn’t necessarily equal surgery


16 is a minor but isn’t child according to the definition of the word and medical classification. But you are free to have whatever definitions suit you

 

If you go back to my original statement you will notice that I said also puberty blockers and hormones.... And yes those are being given to children.

How anyone can support this insane sickness is absolutely evil and mind-boggling

 

Once when I was a child I said that I wanted to be a fire engine when I grew up.

God forbid a child say such a thing today because some woke parents will probably start giving them extra iron in their diet...

 

There isn't anything out there that can't be good or bad. I fully agree with you on the FLDS and even some of the Muslim sects. But keep in mind that they are strictly polygyny AND treat women and children as chattel. For every horror story of theirs I could give success stories of those who are not part of those groups. Including polyandry marriages, and ones like mine that can only fall under polygamy, since there are 2 or more of each sex. My spouses and I have been married for almost a decade, which is better than a lot of mono marriages. I know a triad (MMF) whose been married for close to 50 years. The problem is only looking at the FLDS as the example for polygamy or polyamory is like looking at WBC as the example for Christianity

 

Because that's not the only thing they are trying to ban.

 

You are free to prove otherwise. Yours is the positive assertion. Can't prove a negative.

 

Except that incels are usually heterosexual, and mostly males, complaining that they can't get laid. The term technically applies to other similar demographics, but the visible majority is the white cis het male.

 

So I just want to get this straight before I prove you wrong.

You're saying that no children are being given puberty blockers and hormones, is that correct?

If you go back up and read the link I gave about 15 or 20 minutes ago there was plenty of information in there from CBS about that happening

 

Funny how your own article agrees with me. You probably should have read it before lecturing people about being better informed. From the article you provided, but didn't actually read: "Gender-reassignment surgery, which may include removing or creating penises, is only done by a handful of U.S. doctors, on patients at least 18 years old,"

 

And if you read it you will also notice the part where it says a growing number of children are taking puberty blockers and hormones.

How anyone can support doing that to children is absolutely disgusting

 

Perhaps, I am going off what you said in the post I quoted. I agree surgery (including circumcism) shouldn’t be done on minors unless they are at risk of permanent injury.

I mean the religious conservatives said the same thing about blacks, and then of gays, so…

How about we allow medical and psychological evidence to prevail and keep the government out of it?

 

How about people just leave children alone and their developmental phase and stop confusing them and drugging them?

I guess that's just too much to ask.

 

Unnecessary risk and has a huge effect on one going forward in life, why not let them decide when older?

Puberty blockers do not give them breasts, it postpones puberty so they can choose as an adult

but I agree, hormones to make one more a man are illegal for boys, so those should be done as an adult

 

That is first a lot of misinterpretation on your part, and conflating of other treatments as if the only thing done is surgery and hormones. Further, the attempt of those seeking to block care want to include all care even that which does not involve hormones and surgery. Adding into that, that you consider 16 children only shows that you have no real concept of age or maturity.

With that said, I will never claim that there are not unethical medical practitioner's out there, anymore that I would assert that there are not predator priests out there. That doesn't take away from the fact that the majority are not and treat these people with care ethics and long term treatments. It's not like transitioning happens over night, save maybe if the only transitioning needed is presentation, which can be all that is needed in some that do have GD. What you are basically doing is trying to claim, to male a parallel, is claim that because of the existence of predator priest and religious leaders, then we should ban all priests and religious leaders. After all, don't you want to protect the children?

 

Given that we have done that for far longer than transgenderism has been an issue, and you all never complained about it before, means that you are not as informed as you claim.

 

Ah, so it was just my post that you didn't read before responding. I disagree with your assumption that the government should have more say in a minor's healthcare than their guardians, physicians, and psychiatrists do. That kind of authoritarianism is disgusting

 

Confusing them? Like with religious propaganda?

As to the “drugging” part — if a medical professional believes they are at risk of self harm or self mutilation do you think nothing should be done? Or do you think they should drug them with different medications?

 

All you had to do was say yes or no

 

Abusing children is not healthcare. You're just trying to hide behind that label to make it seem like you're defending something virtuous

 

And? What part of that was hard for you to understand?

 

Just because Little Johnny plays with the Barbie doll at some point does not mean that little Johnny should be transitioned into little Jenny.

 

I was asking the same question of you LMFAO

 

Any time there is a one, two or more the first hurdle is jealousy Then the second hurdle, "Children from multiple partners and equality". I get it, it's cool to double up on partners! But I believe it's better if they or you GO HOME the next morning And as for children from multiple partners go, well I believe the black communities have shown us what a mess that can turn out to be..

 

Wait, so you say you we’re aware of all of this and still chose to say something incredibly stupid and unenlightened anyway?