Michael, Michelle, WTF, No Difference

The implication was overtly sexualized. I am not fond of cop-outs. "I never said what kind of fantasies I have had" reads like a serious backpedal.

I am not shy.

Neither are you.

Have you ever had a sexual fantasy about Obama?

Have you ever had a sexual fantasy about Hitler?

 

http://www.politicalforum.com/polit...ead-bush-voters-supporters-2.html#post4522069

Obama no where fits the bill of the type of man I like.

Hitler on the other hand is pretty okay I guess. Needs to save his mustache I guess.

 

You did not answer the questions.

I understand it is a power and control thing.

Were they sexual in nature

 

Only if you get a sensation from seeing someone have to endure a SAW trap.

 

Okay, even I have to admit that is pretty lame. It's okay to read from a teleprompter, but it's a bit silly to call your wife something completely different to her actual name.

 

Same question.

 

Maybe Michael is his real soulmate and he's ready to come out of the closet.
Makes sense, Michael couldn't be any more masculine the Michelle. (yeeeesh!)

 

That's nothing. You should have read about what he did at the St. Patrick's Day party. He read someone else's speech and thanked himself for the party.

 

Do you like SAW Traps?

 

I know everyone has fantasied about Obama being in one of these. Well maybe not.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQ6tWwJ8RHE"]SAW Horsepower Trap[/ame]

 

I feel like Judge Judy.

I am asking you yes or no questions.

You ask questions and now have posted that you were suggesting that EVERY woman (most of whom are liberals) has fantasized about killing Obama.

This is another yes or no question. A yes or no would be fantastic.

Were you sexually aroused by ANY fantasy of either Obama or Hitler?

 

It all depends on what you find sexually arousing.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9Eu5hhTQpk"]Ivan Trap[/ame]

While I don't find SAW traps sexual arousing. I like punishing my enemies.

 

Seriously?

 

Yeah, happened two years ago. The Irish Prime minster speech was placed in the teleprompter, Obama read it and ended up thanking himself for the party.

http://news.sky.com/home/world-news/article/15243932

 

For the record... a yes or no question requires as an answer "yes" or "no"... not yet another question as to what I interpret as arousing. You are free to ask me questions... but you have to answer mine as well.

Were you(singular) sexually aroused by ANY fantasy of either Obama or Hitler?

 

That would be majorly embarrassing.

 

I didn't click the link because I am on snailnet atm...


But it makes you wonder what the PM did...

*MissJonelyn is, of course, under no obligation to answer my simple questions. It is absolutely none of my business. I ask for a very clear reason, which will not be clear until answered... and I realize that it might seem... without answer... as a sort of strange preoccupation with the subject.

It isn't. The original post may have been coy, looking to get "ewwwwwww" replies for whatever reason... but the unwillingness to answer questions or quantify the OP is to me worthy of pursuit. Anyone who ducks an answer is up to something more interesting than TV at 2:30 am.

 

But I don't wanna ask you questions >_>

Do I really have to spell it out for you? No, I like hurting people and punishing my enemies.

 

And I thought he was a bad speaker before. Now it's just without a reasonable doubt. No one can ever say he is a good speaker. It's just got to stop.

 

Well... kinda... I asked very straight questions and you answered with questions. That feels elusive.

You like hurting people?

And this is not related to power and sexuality?

I find this to be an anomaly of the human condition, but have little reason to doubt you.

So be it... you were just trying to get a rise out of people.






That being the case, don't be condescending and ask if you have to spell something out for me.


Pretend I am a robot.

I don't get your jokes.

 

You have me confused with a different internet thing. My point was to demonstrate that if you are going to pose hypothetical questions as non answers (which you did), I will be happy to answer them honestly... but not before you answer the straightforward ones.

No, I do not find saw traps arousing.


I expect some do.


You exist in a box over the internet. I do not presume to know (*)(*)(*)(*) about you.

 

I'm going to get someone to kidnap you and put you in a SAW trap so you'll get it.

That'll teach you.

I have no real jokes. I steal jokes from people much funnier than me.

 

Okay fine...There do you really live >_>

 

No... I live in my house... this is where YOU live.

You could be a 16yr old boy for all I know. You are overtly sexual, and make a comment like "what woman HASN'T fantasized about Obama"


Don't act like I am the one twisting (*)(*)(*)(*). I am (*)(*)(*)(*)ing beautiful. You have no idea what I look like, because it is unimportant in this realm. You, on the other hand, advertise yourself as if to lend legitimacy, or more likely shock value, to your opinions. You may or may not be you. I choose to define myself with a picture of my keyboard and an existential embodiment of the human condition, which seeks control.

You do not get to feign offense when you define yourself by the questions raised against you.

I will leave you the last word.

 

Don't know if you're saying this weird crap just to get a rise out of people or if you're really serious ...... if you're serious - ya got a problem!