Dismiss Notice
Thanks for being a member of our community. Please donate toward site expenses if you can.

Motlen metal pouring from the sides of the towers 7 minutes to collapse

Discussion in '9/11' started by MkStevenson, Jul 15, 2014.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

Page 5 of 6
  1. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    sulphur used in the manufacture of wallboard,maybe?...your appealling to some nonexistent authority surely doesn't trump my experience
     
    LoneStrSt8, Jul 20, 2014
    #101
  2. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    have you seen this
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvQDFV1HINw

    Experiments trump speculation.
    enjoy.
     
    genericBob, Jul 20, 2014
    #102
  3. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    LoneStrSt8, Jul 20, 2014
    #103
  4. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    as in Eutectic welding rod,
    metal shop 101 ..... nothing too extreme here, the concept
    is that a licensed professional engineer conducted an experiment
    to mimic the conditions that were allegedly present in the WTC
    building(s) such to produce the eutectic steel, and said experiment
    came up negative, therefore it leaves open the question of just exactly
    how did this bit of steel get to that state as was observed?
     
    genericBob, Jul 20, 2014
    #104
  5. MkStevenson

    MkStevenson Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2014
    Messages:
    66
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Plastic burns pitch black, as it's petroleum based. Ever burn some in a bonfire, etc.? It has very identifiable characteristics. The METAL that was flowing out of the sides of the wtc's 7 minutes prior to their collapses, wasn't exhibiting those characteristics. I've seen multiple videos of it. There wasn't any smoke relative to that flowing stream of metal. Question is, what metal it was.

    - - - Updated - - -

    My eyeballs don't lie.
     
    MkStevenson, Jul 20, 2014
    #105
  6. MkStevenson

    MkStevenson Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2014
    Messages:
    66
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Metal of some type. You?
     
    MkStevenson, Jul 20, 2014
    #106
  7. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    plastic melts too,scooter
     
    LoneStrSt8, Jul 20, 2014
    #107
  8. MkStevenson

    MkStevenson Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2014
    Messages:
    66
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Sure they do. What I saw wasn't plastic though. Silvery flowing substance, like lead is what it looked like to me. Next you guys are going to tell us it was birthday candles that melted from someone's supply office that story all the candles for office parties, right? Maybe it was just flowing slushies, or possibly melting leftover jellies from the fridges?
     
    MkStevenson, Jul 20, 2014
    #108
  9. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Point is,you claim it's something you have no way of knowing what it really is....guessing.
     
    LoneStrSt8, Jul 20, 2014
    #109
  10. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    More incredulity. Got any evidence?
     
    Hannibal, Jul 20, 2014
    #110
  11. MkStevenson

    MkStevenson Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2014
    Messages:
    66
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Just that video showing molten metal pouring out the sides of the towers minutes before collapse.
     
    MkStevenson, Jul 21, 2014
    #111
  12. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You have yet to prove it's even metal, let alone what type.

    Also: molten anything isn't a symptom of controlled demolition. Controlled demolition does not use heat.
     
    Hannibal, Jul 21, 2014
    #112
  13. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You do realize there were tons of aluminum in that area and enough heat to melt it quite readily don't you? Some guess the temps got as high as 1,800 F which would make aluminum glow yellow.
     
    Hoosier8, Jul 21, 2014
    #113
  14. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The significant feature of a CONTROLLED DEMOLITION
    is that it is CONTROLLED, that is the intent being to demolish
    the building, and the controlled bit, insures the certainty of demolition.

    I really don't care if gun powder or atomic bombs did the job
    the fact is that the destruction of WTC1,2 & 7 clearly indicates
    that there had to have been an additional source of energy at work.
     
    genericBob, Jul 21, 2014
    #114
  15. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    A point which you have failed to provide any evidence for.
     
    Gamolon, Jul 21, 2014
    #115
  16. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Correction, the evidence is abundant
    you just refuse to see it.
     
    genericBob, Jul 21, 2014
    #116
  17. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    The evidence you present is all quote mines and assumptions. The truther community has NOTHING. That's why you can't get more than 1% of the engineering community to back what you say. In almost 13 years!
     
    Gamolon, Jul 21, 2014
    #117
  18. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That 1% of the engineering community
    bit speaks more of the psychological warfare that
    is on-going here, and the perpetrators are in charge
    of the most powerful damn propaganda machine
    that has ever been, so woe unto us, unless we find a way
    to wake people up to the fact that they have been lied to.
     
    genericBob, Jul 21, 2014
    #118
  19. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Physicists and Engineers don't deal in propaganda. They deal in math, evidence and physics.
     
    Hannibal, Jul 21, 2014
    #119
  20. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Sorry to burst your bubble, but you'll NEVER get more people to agree with your thinking because you have zero supporting evidence. Not one of your truther engineers has come up with their own paper filled with calculations to support what you think happened.
     
    Gamolon, Jul 21, 2014
    #120
  21. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Actually what that tells us is that you and your truther community have provided absolutely nothing as far as convincing evidence to get over 1%.
     
    Gamolon, Jul 21, 2014
    #121
  22. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The evidence is abundant, however, will people actually look at the evidence? so much is brushed aside as "oh that really isn't evidence"...... sure, U betcha, its a function of the propaganda machine to convince people that the ONLY bit worthy of paying attention to at all is the OFFICIAL story. every other possible scenario is the product of a sick mind. oops!
     
    genericBob, Jul 21, 2014
    #122
  23. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    If you say so ...

    Meanwhile: where is your evidence?
     
    Hannibal, Jul 21, 2014
    #123
  24. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Just look back over these threads for a few messages.
    enjoy.......
     
    genericBob, Jul 21, 2014
    #124
  25. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    All you've posted thus far are arguments of incredulity. Zero evidence.
     
    Hannibal, Jul 21, 2014
    #125
Page 5 of 6

Share This Page