My Problems with New Atheism

LOL! I gave you an answer also then.

 

I dont need any, I dont have a chip in this fight, I am agnostic. The only people who have to prove their claims are the believers in atheism and theism.

I get to sit on the sidelines and take philosophical potshots at all of you.

Have a wonderful day.

 

So do you keep quiet when creationists want to teach your children that evolution is not real. Do you keep quiet when people tell your children they are going to hell. Many Christians take all of the bible as literal interpretation of religious text. Why would anyone sit quiet through that. Especially when these people can hold office and create and change laws according to the literal interpretation of religious text.

 

BZZZT Wrong!

Your gainsaying does not prove that you "understand" spirituality at all. In fact all you ever post is just gainsaying because you cannot substantiate any of your bogus allegations.

 

The BS about "intelligent design" was exposed by a CONSERVATIVE federal judge.

 

Nah. No one can answer simple questions around here. You guys are stumped.

 

Nah, it wasn’t.

 

Thank you for just proving me 100% right that all you have is kneejerk gainsaying without any substance whatsoever.

 

So have you answered my question?

 

Here is the latest from your "New Atheism".... a man made religion.....http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5053013/Devin-Kelley-outcast-preached-atheism.html

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5053013/Devin-Kelley-outcast-preached-atheism.html

 

BZZZT Wrong!

He was a volunteer bible teacher in 2013!

 

Try to go look at what has been found. The people who profess that it is proof have a biased slant on what they claim but no actual proof. What has been "found" was what was decided before the search and anything that could be made to support it was proclaimed as proof. Proof of a further lie, which you are happy to buy into. Keeps you from having to reason.

 

Why? You will never accept an answer unless it totally agrees with you and trust me, you are so wrong that this will never happen.

Meanwhile, prove everyone else wrong and provide a truthful answer to questions asked of you,. if you are capable of truth.

 

In you every statement supporting your position but you are to dishonest to admit that.

 

The only one who is "stumped" would be you, since you continue to claim evidence yet provide none. Dishonest even for the likes of you.

 

What you actually do is lie about your agenda and claim to be agnostic. The history of your posts proves that to be a further lie from you.

Then you provide proof of your lack of logic by claiming that only those who disagree with you have to prove themselves while in fact it is you who need to do this if you want anyone to take anything you say seriously.

Not to mention that you seem to not understand what philosophy is and just continue your worthless babbling.

is little wonder that you receive no support from anyone who can actually think.

 

There is no actual evidence to support your claims. Zero. If there were it would be splashed across the headlines world wide. It has not been.

You are caught in another fantasy or lie. You pick.

 

I guess you mean like those for the theists that allow them to not think, merely accept whatever nonsense is told to them.

 

Don't know how many times you theists need to be told, Atheism is not a religion. No matter how many times you insist on declaring this lie.

BTW, all religions are manmade. You don't see any other species making fools of themselves with any sort of religion, only a subset of humans called theists.

 

I am asking a simple question. I do not know if I have evidence or not if no one can tell me what evidence is required.

 

No human could provide evidence. In order to provide evidence for the existence of God, God himself / herself must reveal themselves to all, not to just a handful of people with mental issues.

 

So you make the rules for everyone now? Nah, not so.

 

You claim to have "evidence" yet don't know what to provide? Rock solid argument there.

 

Actually, that sounds quite logical. No wonder you don't understand.