This analysis of statements from news reporters is most interesting, and it confirms that an "official narrative" was cultivated from the beginning. https://www.globalresearch.ca/how-3...-twin-towers-explosive-demolition-911/5718119
Already posted here: http://www.politicalforum.com/index...-scam-exposed-in-all-its-glory.458597/page-18 But here's the interview with the authors Ted Walter and Graeme MacQueen:
How ironic ... trooofers condemn the MSM and now want to use them as sources .... I'm sure all reporters here went through a thorough debriefing afterwards by the gubmint (even though talking heads usually have no clue what they are talking about ..."ooh I heard some booms")
nothing at all sophisticated watching troofers grasp at straws ... when can we revisit your nuke theory? ...
Trolling your kindergarten nonsense as usual, eh Shiner? 1. There is no such thing as a "trooofer site". 2. Extensive, detailed documentation of factual events that took place on 9/11 as witnessed and reported first hand by the news media is critical to everyone's understanding of what actually took place that day. It's just one aspect about 9/11, one of many, that the US government has never and will never undertake because it contradicts the official 9/11 narrative. 3. The gullible are those who continue to swallow and promote the official propaganda story despite the mountain of evidence contradicting it and who continue to deny proven facts about 9/11 that do not support that official propaganda. 4. Nothing on that site is a request for any kind of donation. Furthermore, all the research leading to the detailed account presented by 2 individuals was done pro bono and everyone who actually cares should rightfully express their gratitude for documentation that would never have been available otherwise. However, even if there was a request for a donation, it takes minimal intelligence to understand that nothing is free and research certainly isn't. Since the US government has provably not told us the truth about 9/11, it is paramount that legitimate independent investigations attempt to uncover the truth about this event and that is of course not free. 5. Only a complete mindless fool and/or troll would denigrate such extensive work.
“How 36 + Reporters Heard Explosive Demolition on 9/11.” The next day they forgot what they said... https://www.bitchute.com/video/1N06...0tcxO8usgxSHO4NlukMX9hTtrBgd5SDMiQXcCMllfaTAQ
That event had millions of things going on at the same time and much of it we do not understand. Some of it is just bewildering. That does not mean that a conspiracy lies at the heart of it however in fact, I haven't seen anything that would hint at a conspiracy. The big one obviously is that there was no reason to do an attack in this fashion and that is the first thing you need to establish when trying to pin down a conspiracy. As I said, millions of things took place and all had to fall in a particular order and there is no government or agency in the world that could have done this many complicated things perfectly....it just wouldn't happen. I mean picture this..you are sitting in your small conspiracy group and want to go to war in Iraq so you guys are thinking up a false flag to go to war. Some guy says, "I know...let's hijack 4 jetliners and crash them into 4 important buildings that will then collapse"! People would look at him like he's an idiot.....it's way too complicated, way too many people would have to be involved, and the chances of it not working are astronomical. Instead they would probably plant a dead Iraqi with a nuke in NY and set it off for the same effect. This is the main reason I find any conspiracy about 9/11 to not have any basis in fact. I compare it to a tornado going through a neighborhood. It could tear down every house on the block except for one bathroom wall in one persons house and even the knick knacks on the shelves haven't moved. That is an impossibility and something you could never repeat but does it mean that there was no tornado or just that we can't explain it? How did the buildings collapse, what were the booms, how did the reporters know.......blah blah blah....with that many things happening we will never be able to know exactly how everything occurred, not with current technology.
The only thing that makes a crime a conspiracy is when 2 or more people commit the crime. No hint??? You actually think only 1 person did 9/11?
Many of your questions have been answered, but you will never find those answers in the mainstream media. It clearly WAS a conspiracy, because humans acted in concert to achieve a goal. The only question is just WHO the conspirators were. 19 arabs with box cutters, or somebody else? It's interesting to note that the government's own 911 Commission noted 60+ times in its report that "we found no evidence..." to support various elements, 60+ elements, of the official story.
Destruction of the WTC South Tower on 9/11: Analysis of Perimeter Column Trajectory Reveals Mechanism of Demolition By Wayne Coste On the morning of 9/11 approximately six seconds after the top block of the South Tower began a hinging movement to the east, that top portion of the South Tower was completely demolished by outwardly directed, energetic forces which many people (imprecisely) attribute to "explosives." This top block of the South Tower was large and consisted of approximately 30 floors - nearly one-third of the height of the Tower. Approximately three seconds after the initial hinging movement, the demolition of the lower part of the South Tower began in earnest at the 80th floor. It began with a series of outward bursts of propellant - observed as the horizontal expansion of a cloud of dust and debris that was much lighter in color than the dark smoke from the fires in the burning tower. The ejection of many exterior structural elements - some traveling for great distances were observed. A new analysis describes one of the most interesting objects is a large wall section that appears to span nearly the entire width of the Tower which was seen "surfing" its way into oblivion. Because of the low resolution in most older YouTube videos, these features were thought to be core columns. However, in reviewing the more detailed versions available through NIST's FOIA Releases they are clearly seen to be perimeter column sections with the horizontal connecting spandrel plates plainly visible. Additionally, the video captures the stationary, standing core structure immediately after the perimeter wall and office areas were propelled away from the core. The video has sufficient resolution to reveal details of the surviving structure. Read the rest ... https://www.opednews.com/articles/1...s-And-Engineers-For-911-Truth-200912-845.html
