Who made you the judge of what people want to see? Sorry that you are not mentally strong enough to handle a male cheerleader.
Republican President George W bush was a cheerleader. So was Republican President St Ronald Republican President Eisenhower was a cheerleader as well. If right wingers see male cheerleaders as gay, why did you elect so many gay presidents?
Do you honestly think that the NFL's primary demographic wants to see this? And do you mean to say that anytime someones sees something they dislike or disagree with, they're simply 'mentally weak'?
None of these guys were dancing like women during the brodcasts of professional football games. I shouldn't of had to explain that to you, which leads me to believe you're just here to troll, which is why I won't answer anymore stupid questions you put forth. G'night.
If you seriously have to ask that question you are delusional.......at least as to this topic......just stop.
Only after it infiltrated republican presidential choices. Trump was too fat to be a cheerleader, but he really enjoys a good drag queen. I'll bet their legal strategy discussions are NC17 rated.
No we just want it to be somewhat normal.....it’s really not to much to ask........and it won’t be ‘asked ‘ in the not to distant future. Think Berlin 1932.
It doesn't hurt at all, and there's no reason why one should have to explain why. What hurts is that someone thought this to be a gotcha moment. SMH, that's sad.
I'm sorry if you can't keep up, but since you don't understand I'll try to explain it to you. Several respondents seem to be upset because there is a male cheer leader. I'm not sure the words Gay or Effeminate were used, but they were certainly implied. I merely pointed out that several republican presidents were cheerleaders as well and questioned if they should be subject to the same derision and insulting remarks as the current cheerleader. I suspect the mods won't have the same problem understanding how my post relates to the subject, but feel free to contact them if you wish. Just because someone doesn't agree with you doesn't make their comments off subject. That would be as goofy as calling all news reports that don't parrot your beliefs "fake news"
You displayed an orange in a thread about apples, then once it was explained that you were holding an orange you stomped your feet and made a ppffttthh noise. Good night, sweet dreams.
Again, just because you don't agree with something doesn't make it irrelevant. You might have just as well claimed my post was fake news.
Might as well be, but then again it's like an admission by those who decided this was a good idea. "We already know we're pushing the limits, but putting this special fruitcake in a dress would be too much." You have to slowly boil a frog, not try to fry it.