New York reveals its blood lust for baby killing

What Bible is that?

 

That is around the time when the book in question "Numbers" was written.

 

I am not the store clerk murdered by a drug addict during a robbery either

But I still make it my business to oppose wonton murder of innocent human beings

 

I assume nothing

Science proves that the dna of an unborn child is human and unchanged from conception to the end of life

 

What is around the time?

 

Actually, it remains the same even after death - and the courts say you can't be charged with murdering a dead person. Not much of
an argument for you there.

 

What are you babbling about?

Oh well

I made my point even if you refuse to admit it

 

Completely wrong! We talk about unborn persons and the general question ... which is poisoned with religious points of view ... is from when does this state as life and from when not!
If one takes the Hardcore Christians with their medieval point of view, then sex may already serve only for reproduction and thus a successful fertilization is already "life" .... and where condoms are already devils stuff, becuase they prevent that!
So nice to continue to beat the women who lustfully have sex with men and then for whatever reason unintentionally pregnant, lose the right to their own body because of whatever sort of god's will.

Welcome to the medieval ... grab the pyre for the comming witch burning!

 

Remember...everything is gods will, folks. That includes abortion and gay marriage. Cheers!

 

Define "time" .

 

You just assumed that a Child exists. This is fallacious gibberish on steroids = "Assuming the Premise".

Science proves that the DNA of the zygote (the single human cell at conception) is human. Having human DNA does not make a single human cell "a human".

You are confusing the difference between the word Human (when used as a descriptive adjective - Human cell, Human feces, Human heart) with the noun (A human, a living human and so on).

 

Is it shorter to midnight or by bus ?

 

Adam's DNA was the same until he died but he wasn't alive until God gave him the breath of life.
That is why abortion is not allowed after a fetus could conceivably breath, it's based on the Bible. The NY law codifies that if the fetus will not know life, ie breath, then an abortion of the fetus can be allowed. Nobody is killing viable births unless death of mother AND child likely. Medical ethics still puts a baby higher priority if one or the other will perish.

I for the life of me can't understand anyone that would insist that a woman suffer the trauma of carrying a fetus that she knows will never know life. It's difficult to come up with a worse mental torture.

 

That cell is going to develope into a human being

It wont grow to be a pinky finger and then stop

 

Thats an interesting retort

Except that Adam was not alive or at least as far as I know till God breathed life into him

But an unborn child is alive from the moment of conception

 

The Bible repeatedly requires breath when defining life. Adam is but one example. Why do you believe your definition of life is more valid than the Bible's? And for heaven's sake how do you justify torturing a woman by making her carry a fetus with no heart beat? Imagine having to keep your mumified still born with you 24/7 for months before you are allowed to bury it? Think you'd be able to keep your sanity?

 

What?

 

Dictionary definition.

 

That is the answer to your question .. "what is around the time" It means we do not know the exact date but we figure Numbers - in its earliest written form was written around 900 BC = roughly 3000 years ago.

 

Got a source which supports this?