Nikki Haley dodges question on whether a man can become a woman

Both homosexuality and gender identity as an inherent trait of an individual is purely a human invention.

 

We could 10-15 years ago when the dictionary defined gender as either of the male or female sex.

 

Gender dysphoria is a mental disorder

 

Humans have 2 arms. That some humans are not born with two arms or some humans who lose an arm, does not change that fact that humans have 2 arms.

 

Every feminist and non feminist had a man who was their father and a woman who was their mother.

 

Although I have pointed out in the past that mountain gorillas have little balls, females generally mate with just one male throughout their life, the care of offspring is the role of both sexes and a male will fight a predator to death to protect its offspring. While bonobos have big balls, sexual behavior occurs with many partners of both sexes, the care of offspring is purely the domain of females and a male bonobo confronted by a predator attacking his offspring will run as he has no clue as to who is their offspring.
Humans have balls of medium size. Being more like mountain gorillas is beneficial to the human race.

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female

 

I like how at the very end of that definition they added a small, very small portion to a trans hat tip lol. Like they’re going through the definition and then threw that in as an after thought haha

 

There's absolutely no evidence that the human race will never be able to genetically change sex. We don't know enough about the human body to be able to affirm categorically that "men can't become women". Do you know everything about present and future possible genetic mutations and all the other factors, internal or external, that can affect the human body in unexpected ways?

You seem to be sure that human evolution is over and nothing will ever change. You're wrong.

 

Ever heard the expression "equality before the law"? This is the equality women demand.

 

I'm not a liberal, and I'm not justifying anything. I'm showing certain people who claim something is scientifically impossible how little they know about genetics, evolution, and science in general.

 

Humans have two arms.

Humans have a primal instinct to pass on a copy of their DNA.

Some trans really look like women. Even if they only entice me to send a single message to them, they have deceived me in my efforts to pass on a copy of my DNA. They have wasted time that would've otherwise been spent on that endeavor. I realized this concept in dark nightclubs in Thailand in which I found a trans person grinding on me every few minutes. I thought that there was something deceitful and wrong on this dance floor, and I'm the one being wronged. And I have deduced what that fundamental wrong is: these people are attempting to purposefully interfere with one of my prime instincts, the desire to find a mate, by falsely claiming to be in the potential mate pool

 

Yeah, I'd preferred to get a picture from my biology book instead of a Wikipedia site that is edited by the community instead of just biologists, but I don't have it anymore.

At least they acknowledge it's a socially made up idea and not a biological definition.

 

We make the dictionaries. Dictionaries don't make us. I don't care about old dictionaries.

 

And how am I stopping equality from law? I mean if I’m the reason feminists exist as you claim then tell me where I don’t want equality under law by sex?

 

I didn't say it is scientifically impossible absolutely. I said it is currently not possible with science. There is a difference. The current procedures are like breaking the leg of a chair so that you can call it a stool but unfortunately for the chair it's still a chair and now it can neither function as a chair or a stool.

 

It is scientifically impossible for the subject we are talking about… you know, that thing called humans.

 

We do know enough about the human body to claim it is physically impossible to change your sex. Tell me one piece of scientific evidence that proves otherwise.

 

Computers and the internet are human inventions, yet you don't seem to have a problem with these.

"Inherent trait" is an abstract concept, and as such is a human invention. However, this concept was invented to describe something that exists in the objective reality. Or are you saying that homosexuality doesn't exist in the objective reality?

 

Seriously? Do you need me to quote your posts about women not fit for politics?

 

Well this thread certainly took a turn into insanity.

 

Never said they shouldn’t be equally protected under law. I said I will never ever vote for a woman. They can run all they want. They can till they’re blue in the face I just refuse to vote for them and yes I believe they are unfit to be world leaders. That has zero to do with equality under law.

 

It hard to keep a sane conversation when you find a couple people who can’t define what a woman is, the crazy part is it’s the women that have a hard time with this definition. It’s amazing

 

I'm sad that the West has struggled and clawed it's way out of the muck to actually have an Enlightenment in which the scientific method and reason held some sway, and now it's all being swept aside to some crazy primitive religion in which feelings determine reality instead of reality being...reality regardless of how you feel about it.

 

The fact that it’s the women in this forum arguing that a man can become a woman and arguing what a woman should be defined as allowing men in that definition only backs up my theology that women are unfit for political roles