No explanation for 9/11 families?

Discussion in '9/11' started by Stndown, Apr 11, 2014.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'm not sure about any special grant that Griffin may have received from the "GOV"
    but in the case of a NON-PROFIT, Gage is NOT getting special treatment at all
    the fact is any group that can satisfy the requirements for being a real non-profit,
    gets the tax breaks, this is not about somekina special hand-outs from Uncle Sam
    for the "truther" faction.
     
  2. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So tax breaks from the government isn't some sort of 'special treatment'?


    Especially from a government he claims was behind 9/11?
     
  3. n0spam

    n0spam New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2014
    Messages:
    485
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    what are they supposed to do, deny a legit application for non-profit status?
    that would be rather blatant ... don't you think?
     
  4. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So his hypocrisy knows no bounds,eh?
     
  5. n0spam

    n0spam New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2014
    Messages:
    485
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Please explain "hypocrisy" reference
     
  6. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    :wierdface:
     
  7. n0spam

    n0spam New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2014
    Messages:
    485
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    "wierdface" Just exactly what is that supposed to communicate?
     
  8. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You need to have the term 'hypocrisy' explained to you?
     
  9. n0spam

    n0spam New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2014
    Messages:
    485
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Not define the term, by WHY is it being used in this discussion?
     
  10. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You need your hand held, I see. Okay, I'll try to use small words.

    Stndwn comes in, throwing around insults and changing the subject and accuses other people of throwing around insults and changing the subject.
    This is known as "hypocrisy".
    Definition: the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform

    Lonestrst8 called him on this hypocrisy.

    Do you understand or shall we continue the discussion along this path?
     
  11. n0spam

    n0spam New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2014
    Messages:
    485
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yes, its possible to accuse anyone of hypocrisy .... so be it, HOWEVER,
    back to the topic at hand, and that is I believe the matter of what explanation
    the families of the victims have been given. My take on the subject is that
    the families have NOT been given proper information about what happened
    to their loved ones. We must ask questions & DEMAND answers, remember
    ALL of the Senators & Congresspeople & the President are all employees of
    the voters & taxpayers of this nation.
     
  12. Stndown

    Stndown Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2014
    Messages:
    889
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0

    Debunked by those that have an agenda to pursue? Conversely, 'anyone with a brain' can see the mammoth holes in the whole 9/11 fiasco.
     
  13. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    There are NO 'mammoth holes'...you've had 12 years to post them...still nothing.
     
  14. Stndown

    Stndown Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2014
    Messages:
    889
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What does that have to do with debunking anything?

    - - - Updated - - -


    Oh, please. There certainly are.
     
  15. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    NO there are NOT.....you're imagining things.
     
  16. Stndown

    Stndown Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2014
    Messages:
    889
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Oh please. There are holes you can drive a truck through. Whenever they're mentioned though, they get buried in ridicule, and misdirection.
     
  17. BdD1138

    BdD1138 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2014
    Messages:
    117
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    FALSE.....they are shown for what they are, nonsense..
     
  18. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yet you can't seem to provide evidence for any.
    Sad.
     
  19. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    IF there were 'holes you can drive a truck through' why haven't you shown them?
     
  20. n0spam

    n0spam New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2014
    Messages:
    485
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Significant bits of real evidence are brushed aside by the debunker faction.
    The fact that YOU do not get it, in no way negates the validity of the evidence.
     
  21. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    There has been zero evidence presented for 'inside job'.
     
  22. BdD1138

    BdD1138 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2014
    Messages:
    117
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    false....
     
  23. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What 'evidence'?

    You've shown none for me to 'get'
     
  24. n0spam

    n0spam New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2014
    Messages:
    485
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It is rather telling that Boeing has not weighed in on the issue
    of can you even operate an airliner ( at all ) at the alleged 590 MPH
    at so near sea level. the lack of definitive INFORMATION on this subject
    alone is very interesting indeed!
     
  25. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Because they don't NEED to.
     

Share This Page