North Korea ready to negotiate on nukes with Russia's help.....

That's a reasonable and civil response. We just don't agree but that's ok. There is nothing short of war China or Russia can do. China could start a trade war but it'll hurt them as much as us.

 

When you say no one you are projecting your opinions onto everyone else as if you speak for them

And you dont

But you are typical of the liberal species in America so I have no doubt others like you agree with you

 

Its interesting that diaryair pays more respect to the red lines of chinese and russians than he/she does for America

Our red line is no north korean nukes that than reach the US.and destroy American cities and millions of our citizens in the blink of an eye

Liberals like dairyair give that red line no respect at all

Their attitude is to hell with what America wants

But they care deeply that if china does not want a war near its border then thats what dairyair does not want too

 

No. Specifically Republicans. The first North Korean nuclear test occurred under a Republican and he did nothing.

The same Republican who abandoned a US ally when they were invaded.

I think your fear of liberals is totally misplaced. Evidence says conservative “America First!”-ers are going to be the ones having a problem with sending Americans to die to save foreigners.

 

What is more interesting is how you always manage to get everything messed up and have no clue what another person says.
I have never said I have more respect to RED lines. That is an all out fabrication on your part. But par for the course for you.
So, when you decide you what you are talking about, maybe someone will take you serious. Until then, you just make up nonsense and no one takes you serious.

 

If you mean bush41 it was very late in his term

Clinton was the first president to struggle with it and almost went to war when jimmy carter intervened and cut a deal wiyh the north koreans

Then budh43 which may have been when the first nuclear test took place

Then obama

None of thise 3 ended tje nortk korean program and now its trumps turn to save us in the 11th hour

 

Except you have still yet to show that nuclear war is inevitable.

 

Your paranoia, their paranoia, it is the same madness.
If it is surrendered to, then nuclear war is inevitable.

 

I dont have a crystal ball that can show the future and neither do you

Letting north korea have nukes will have very bad consequences for the entire world and could lead to nuclear war

You can disagree but you have no perfect view of the future either

 

USA, russia, china, pakistan, israel, having nukes could be very bad consequences as well and lead to nuclear war.

If you own tank and have it in your yard and threaten me, I should also be allowed to own a tank.

 

They have nukes already but Iran and North Korea are still in the early stages of development

Liberals have this crazy idea that more nukes in more hands makes the world safer, but it doesent

 

Why? We are less likely to use nukes on a country that can nuke us back.
We are the only world threat to use nukes at the moment. We have had a couple of admins who said all options are on the table. Including this one. Meaning nukes are an option.
The USA is the only country I've heard say nukes are an option to a problem.

 

You should show a little more loyalty and respect for your own country

When they dont get their way liberals can be as hsteful toward America as the foreigners are

 

What is the disrespect?
Are you saying we have not said in Iran and NK cases, all options are on the table? Are you denying those very words said by Bush and Trump?

Are you so afraid that you are in denial that we have been the only country in the last 20 yrs to say we will use nukes if necessary?

 

Yes, that is incorrect.
North Korea says it.

Also France said it would use nukes in response to any terrorist attack on them after 9/11. Or the Burhka ban or whatever it was.

There may have been others, but these two spring directly to mind.

 

It has been international policy since the 50’s to limit the proliferation of nuclear weapons because of the danger they pose

Putting nukes in the hands of togue states like the iranians and north koeans has been opposed not only by the US but by the world community that libs like you hold so much respect for

And yes you were insulting America by the way you spoke about her

Since 1945 we have had many opportunities to use nuclear weapons and have not done so

 

Spoke about her? Grow up. What was the way I spoke about her.

 

Saying we are the biggest threat tonuse nuclear weapons is a damn lie

Unless you believe it in which case you should know better

 

You have not heard cons, Trump, Bush say in regards to Iran, Syrian, NK, that all options are on the table? It is your party making those statements.
You know, nukes is one of those options.
So you now are caught lying about me speaking bad of our country.

Bush says all options on table on Iran

Reuters Staff

1 MIN READ
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. President George W. Bush reiterated on Tuesday that all options were on the table in dealing with Iran’s nuclear challenge.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...ptions-on-table-on-iran-idUSN1945300920070619

Trump: ‘All options are on the table’ after North Korea launched missile over Japan
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ile-launch-over-japan/?utm_term=.7dd650ec5c11

 

Would you rather they joined thumb sucking liberals in the corner by saying we will never use nuclear weapons because it might damage the enironment?

Nuclear weapons have always been under the MAD system and must be kept ready (and willing) to use at all times

 

So, now you speak badly of the USA country. For now you admit, we are the only one's in recent history to declare the use of Nukes.
And now you even admit you will be ok with using nukes.

You owe me an apology.

 

We may be forced to use them

Can you assure the north koreans that America will not use nukes on them even if they attack us?

An absolute no use policy would be pretty stuoid

 

We use nukes on Chinas border, you can surely bet China won't take kindly to that. And may retaliate in kind.
Nukes should never be an option. Using them on Japan should render as to why it is not an option.

And you were in here yelling how I hate America and dissed her because we are the only country in recent history to threaten use of nukes.

Then you come out and say, you agree with that policy.
This is why you are always all over the map. You have no clue about most of the things you spout.

 

We dont need to use nukes against north korea unless they use nukes on us

So stop with the SKY IS FALLING bs

However kim may use nukes as his dying gesture to the world

If china is worried what might happen they should get off their ass and disarm kim or kill him

 

By nuking Canada? Or Mexico?