Obama and BLM found in violation of federal law in Nevada

The BLM does not have 200 trained soldiers on retainer. The BLM brought in mercenaries to act as law enforcement. That is against the law. Anytime the BLM feels it necessary to hire extra law enforcement to carry out its duties it MUST be hired from local law enforcement. Maximum feasible reliance.
Can you not understand yet?

 

now prove it which you cannot!

 

The only person that used mercinaries was Bundy

 

They are not mercenaries, look at the uniform, clearly states BLM Law Enforcement .

Also I did see one person in a Park Service uniform.

 

Cite the specific law BLM violated, and I don't mean the one you started in the OP. That one has been debunked.

I saw no law breaking by BLM at this point. I saw a tense situation and mistakes made by the BLM, but no law breaking.

 

All regulatory agencies do not write the laws. Congress does and those regulatory agencies enforce those laws. Geez. where were you when you took HS civics class?

The FBI investigates criminal activity, mostly in Title 15, but also some national security violations as well. They do not have the jurisdiction to investigate civil violations as the BLM with Bundy was.

there has been no evidence either way and it does not change the fact that it is simply an option for the DOL Secretary.

What dirty work are you talking about?

And yet, there was armed militia.

The pen is mightier than the sword. If you truly want to resolve this, legal action will be required, not armed militia who do not know what the hell they are doing there.

Although there have been claims that BLM were ordered to shoot, there has been oo evidence and the source of all talk of that order is suspect, at best.

 

that's a rangers uniform.

Notice all the street clothes and generic uniforms.

 

How could it be debunked when you haven't read it?
Read it again with the understanding that no federal agency is supposed to have a standing army. That's what necessary stands for. The fact that anytime the BLM needs to conduct law enforcement it will be necessary to contract for it. WITH MAXIMUM FEASIBLE RELIANCE on local law enforcement.

If the BLM had carte Blanche to have a standing army the entire law would not be needed now would it? Learn how to read.
Now, if anyone doesn't have the intellectual honesty to understand that refrain from posting your dishonest opinions based on ignorance.

 

Wrong on all counts.

 

I already know that Obama wasn't involved in the Bundy case.

What I'd like to know is why the title of this thread states that Obama was found in violation of federal law in Nevada. I have yet to get an answer.

I suppose Obama was also involved in the Spanish Inquisition and Pearl Harbor.

 

Was Obama president during either of those two incidents?
The BLM is under him. He's responsible. Did you forget already?

 

You don't really think prosecutors are going to try their case in public, do you? That's for grandstanding defense attorneys.

 

In the title of your thread you said found in violation of the law??? Exactly what court ? If you cannot prove guilt in a court of law kindly ask the mods to change the title of your thread. Right now it is an opinion pieace.

 

There's a Democrat Mayor in Libville, Idaho who stole paper clips from the office. Obviously, Obama is responsible.

 

I hope both of you little tots will be able to sleep tonight. Pathetic.

 

Would that be Tarot Cards, Ouiji Board, Tea Leaves or out of body experience?

 

Niether Obama or the BLM has been found in violation of any law. That is your opinion and not based in any fact. You are deflecting as usuall because you know you are flat wrong.

 

By who? Holder the puppet?

 

I think the idea is that Obama is involved because one of his cabinet level departments (Interior Department) are up to their neck in this.

For what it's worth, even I, who detest Obama, think Obama should only be blamed if and when it's shown he has had a hand in this all.

 

There is no standing army. They are special agents, aka LEO with the specific task of their jurisdiction. The specific task is within the jurisdiction of the DOL.

BTW, the law that you are citing, that "the secretary shall offer to local law enforcement" has been debunked. That is not a violation of the law.

 

Right on all counts.

 

The BLM illegally violated the terms of their own court order by entering the Bundy ranch and brandishing weapons there. In addition they illegally caused willful and wanton damage to Bundy's ranch.

This is all fact! If they haven't been found in violation of any law it's purely because Holder refuses to look.

 

Wrong on both counts but I'm willing to allow you to be wrong forever. Easier to change a diaper than your mind. Less ) ) ) ) in it.

 

I looked at the pictures. It appears to be the U.S. Park Police special weapons and response team. what is not shown is letters on the back of their uniform.

 

Right on both counts. there is no standing army here. That is a figment of your imagination. More than likely, it is the U.S. Park Service Special Response Unit, aka the police. You can't tell because there was no clear pictures to show the letters on the back of the uniform.

this was probably done because Clivil Bundy threatened to use force against any federal agency, not good. This was understood back in the 1920's when FBI agents were gunned down by organized crime. Then they were, and any federal agency, to protect their members for performing their duties.

The "law" that you cited is not in violation. You are reading what you think it reads, not what it is supposed to read. You do not understand the contest, legally, of what it means to "to offer" in legal terms. To offer does not mean it has to be done or should be done, it mean that it may be done upon the discretion of the Secretary of the Interior.