Only 37% of Democrats want a second Biden term – a 15% decline from October

I asked you, "who gets to decide what individuals need." Want to try again?

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...ne-from-october.608043/page-2#post-1074019899

 

I'm not really anti-Biden. He's just the bearer of a party with all of the wrong policies. If another lefty was president, things wouldn't be any different.

 

The individual, aka body autonomy..liberty?
What do you mean try again it's on the list of things that the left stand for.

 

It's easy see why Biden's polling is so terrible, his foolish multiple red ink orgies have just crushed real wages after Americans enjoyed steady income growth under the previous president.



The foolish reckless, multiple red ink orgies of Biden and the Dems required the Fed to start draining money supply and has left Americans with falling real wages for the first time in years.

Money supply which had been growing very nicely under the previous president, with widespread prosperity, suddenly reversed under the foolish policies of successive red ink orgies and money supply went negative in November.

Look the chart below. Records only go back 65 years, and money supply never went negative, not for a single month, going back to 1960, but under Biden, two negative months in a row.



He's not popular because he isn't good at this.

 

For Nikki Haley, it is here that I read it.

For DeSantis run and when he will announce, it is here where I read it. DeSantis is doing everything to prepare a run from helping the GOP raise money to what he is doing in Florida to having top GOP donors discussions on the particulars of the campaign. I think he is being methodical.

Finally, it is here I read that this will be an unusual 2024 campaign, at least on the GOP side.

 

Yeah, but pretty much everyone else did from heckling to yelling Liar and so forth. And that really turned off independents who watched the SOTU.

 

It's not a 'theory'. It's logic.

The people, as always, do the deciding.

Keep in mind that whoever ends up 'leading' (if a leader is deemed 'necessary') is a reflection of the collective narrative, and, as such, becomes its focal point. No one can become a leader unless they are allowed to by those they wish to lead—whether it be by the voters/general population, the police, or the military—it is always the people who are the enablers.

As is often the case, a leader is initially chosen or allowed to 'come to power' with the eagerness & high hopes of a well-meaning population as a reaction to a real or perceived problem, only to later regret their decision. The leader then remains in power through the use of propaganda, fear, and force. The people have thus created the proverbial 'monster that cannot be slayed'.

If we want good (wise) leaders, we have to change ourselves first. And the first change is to be more discerning & less impulsive about who we give our power over to. The fact that someone like Trump was ever allowed by the people to hold a high position of leadership/influence says a lot about that society. If a society's political & socio-economic system is insane, and its people cannot muster the will to alter or remove it, they will continue to be subject to insane leaders.

In Europe, someone like Trump would've been immediately ousted from office for less than 1% of what he did. Look what happened to Boris Johnson in the UK. Capitalist interests in Europe are perpetually working to undermine the will & needs of the people, but the power of the people through frequent protests & walk-outs continue to hold a lot of clout.

 

Ho Chi Minh's pal Howard Zinn?

Pol Pot's apologist Noam Chomsky?

 

It's comical some here think body autonomy is a privlage left up to democracy, then have the audacity to pretend like we didn't get a proper education.

 

Despite Joe Biden's deceitful attempts to paint the economy as rosy, Half of Americans Say They Are Worse Off, Highest Since Great Recession (breitbart.com).

The public according to a recent Gallup Poll is not impressed with Biden's malarkey.

Have a look at a few of his deliberate misrepresentations of the present state of the economy below:

Fact-checking Biden’s claims on the economy in the State of the Union | The Hill

 

We simply used the same standard Trump used when he made a similar claim.

 

Nonsense. Trump actually fostered a job building economy until the Pandemic hit the country hard, and then there was nothing he could do about it when the states decided to shut down their economies.

Biden claimed,
"We have created "12 million new jobs – more jobs created in two years than any president has created in four years."

In reality,

"To believe this claim you also have to believe that people returning to work is the same as creating jobs. But even assuming that were true, President Trump created more jobs in 9 months than Biden has in 24. In February 2020, the US economy boasted 152 million jobs (then a record high). States then shut down their economies and by April that number dropped by 22 million jobs to 130 million. Under Trump, over the next nine months, 13 million people returned to work and the number of jobs stood at 143 million when Biden took office in January 2021."

Biden's fantasy economy: Americans see through SOTU spin on jobs, inflation, deficits | Fox Business

 

Tariffs does not foster a job building economy.
That all happened despite Trumps horrible economic policies thanx to Obama. Trump rode his economic recovery, then trashed it.

 

Biden Economy sucks.

Yahoo To Lay off 20% of Staff by Year-End, Beginning This Week

They can learn to plumb.

 

Even Dem voters worry about "cognitive decline" for Biden 2024

He pretty damn old.