oung athlete, 11, grabbed gun from his mom’s car before shooting teammates: surveillance footage

No it doesnt. TRAINING makes people safer.

The gun itself has nothing to do with making you safer, it is the person, that action, ad the control of the situation that makes it different. The idea that the gun is what make you safer is ridiculous on its face.

 

Keep embarrassing yourself, looks good on you.


Search...


D.C. Law Library

• Code of the District of Columbia

• Title 7. Human Health Care and Safety.

• Chapter 25. Firearms Control.

• Subchapter VII. Miscellaneous Provisions.

• § 7–2507.02. Responsibilities regarding storage of firearms.

Code of the District of Columbia
§ 7–2507.02. Responsibilities regarding storage of firearms.

(a) It shall be the policy of the District of Columbia that each registrant should keep any firearm in his or her possession unloaded and either disassembled or secured by a trigger lock, gun safe, locked box, or other secure device.

(b) No person shall store or keep any firearm on any premises under his control if he knows or reasonably should know that a minor is likely to gain access to the firearm without the permission of the parent or guardian of the minor unless such person:

(1) Keeps the firearm in a securely locked box, secured container, or in a location which a reasonable person would believe to be secure; or

(2) Carries the firearm on his person or within such close proximity that he can readily retrieve and use it as if he carried it on his person.

(c)(1) A person who violates subsection (b) of this section is guilty of criminally negligent storage of a firearm and, except as provided in paragraph (2) of this subsection, shall be fined not more than $1,000, imprisoned not more than 180 days, or both.

(2) A person who violates subsection (b) of this section and the minor causes injury or death to himself or another shall be fined not more than $5,000, imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.



https://code.dccouncil.gov/us/dc/council/code/sections/7-2507.02

 

You say this like guns cannot be legitimately used to stop/solve problems.

 

The US, within the areas heavily populated by a certain demographic, are not civilized.

 

I agree with almost everything you said, but would point out that at some point here in America we need to make more considerations on WHO can carry, and WHO can have access tot hat weapon. This young man was pissed off, and had access to a gun. How do we keep the gun away from the “pissed off” kid. How do we kee the gun away form those who will do harm with it. We as a society are more focused on the gun itself, and refuse to accept that the gun doesn't fire itself. How do we make the innocents safer from those with a gun, because the law focuses on the inanimate object, and not the human tht uses it, and/ the human that is on the other end of that. We cannot have laws that are about an inanimate object, and more laws that protect the human.

 

Liberals who live in the US can attempt to modify the US Consitution if they so desire. Liberals who do not live in the US can [expletive] off.

 

Where does my post claim a gun makes you safer?

 

You choose to be ignorant of your ignorance.

 

Here we have the opinions of gun lovers; one says that it's a shame that the older boys were not armed so that they could have blasted the 11 year old to bits because the 11 year old was a threat to them and another saying that the shot boys deserved to be shot because he was defending himself from the group

 

Every state has a set of laws that cover this.

 

Your response has no basis in reality.

 

Your favorite myth.

 

Its inherent in that the claim is that the gun helps in “self defense”

 

Really:

TOG 6 : "Because on its face, what's what we have here (self-defense justification)"
Ddyad "The best outcome for the community as whole is for the violent criminal to be gunned down in the act"

 

I'm not interested in your racism.

 

So sorry that you can't deal with the laws on securing firearms.
It sure does blow your bull-**** to smithereens.

 

Im saying that they arent strict enough. The right in those country has claimed for 200 years “shall not be infringed”, therefore, anyone should carry.

 

I'm not interested in your willful misrepresentation of this event.
In fact, I'm not at all sure why I am seeing your nonsense, a I have you on ignore.

 

It is fortunate he had the means, the ability, and the will to defend himself from a group of people he could reasonably believe meant to do him bodily harm.
Why do you disagree?

 

So... it doesn't.
Thank you.

 

Obviously.

 

I laugh at your ignorant prattle.
Begone.

 

What conditions should we add and why do you think those restrictions pass the test laid out by the USSC in Bruen?

 

So it does……

But you make it whatever helps you sleep at night….

 

I couldn't give a **** what you think whoever said.